Re: IML: LeBaron ?Vinyl Tops Trim Differences

["jsadowski" <jsadowski@xxxxxxx>]

In addition to the wide roof rail moulding on the 64's with vinyl top, there 
is another moulding beneath that with lots of screws to hold the vinyl down 
along the edges.
John
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <RandalPark@xxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 8:46 PM
Subject: RE: IML: LeBaron  Vinyl Tops Trim Differences


> The trim differences between cars with vinyl tops and those without were 
> mainly in '64, '65, and '66 on all Imperial models. The biggest difference 
> was the roof rail moulding. On the steel top cars, it was simple stainless 
> strip over the drip rail edges. The vinyl top cars had a thick (and 
> possibly even cast) moulding extended above the drip rail. About half of 
> these cars were ordered with vinyl tops and half were not. You could also 
> look at the sales literature to see the differences. I have seen many '64 
> through '66 Imperials that have had the vinyl top added after the fact in 
> upholstery shops. It is an obvious addition, since most folks were not 
> aware of this trim difference.
>
> If there is a trim difference in '67 and '68 LeBaron's, it would have to 
> be very minor. I don't think that there is a difference, but I haven't 
> seen enough of them without a vinyl top to know for sure. The '67 Crown 
> Coupe model may not have been available with an all steel top since one of 
> its main features was the divided half padded top, but of course anything 
> is possible. In '68 I believe that the Crown Coupe had a full padded roof, 
> and it may be a different shape than the '67 Crown Coupe roof as well. The 
> cars look very different when parked side by side. That would be another 
> thing to look for in the sales literature.
>
> It will be interesting to see what others might add to this.
>
> Paul W.
>
> In an email dated 11/6/2005 2:51:19 am GMT Daylight time, "Rob McCall" 
> <Rob_Mopar@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Mine is what I would call maroon. I think the factory name for the color
> > was Flame. The top is black as is the interior. If I do decide to paint
> > the top, it would be black or something else in the dark end of the
> > spectrum.
> >
> > Normally I want to paint any and all of my cars black, but I think maroon
> > works well with the lines of this car. I've been examining some late model
> > colors and I have one in mind to replace the factory maroon. It's not a
> > stock restoration, so I am going base-clear. I want the extra deep gloss
> > with this particular car. However, I do appreciate the look of a highly
> > polished single stage as well. That's just not what I have envisioned for
> > this car.
> >
> > And I still need to place a magnet on the car by the rear window, but I'm
> > feeling pretty good about it being steel back there. Can anybody confirm 
> > or
> > deny that the trim on the "slick-top" is different from the vinyl top 
> > cars?
> >
> > Rob McCall
> > '67 LeBaron
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Jefferson
> > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 2:53 PM
> > To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: IML: LeBaron Vinyl Tops
> >
> > Changing from vinyl to "slick-top" does change the look of the car. If the
> > car is black w/black top (like mint) the change is probably less so.
> > Dudley's '68 LeBaron (REAL nice car by the way)for example, is black w/out
> > vinyl top and it still has that formal pseudo-limo look. However, if it 
> > has
> > a contrasting color vinyl top, and you switch to body color metal it WILL
> > look different.
> >
> > Have seen few LeBaron "slick-tops," but I seem to remember seeing one in
> > light blue, it looked less formal (to me) than w/the vinyl top, more like 
> > a
> > Crown or sedan. Maybe with a dark silver or midnight blue it will still 
> > have
> > a formal appearance, but it seems to change on lighter colors.
> >
> > More formal, or less formal, it's a matter of taste.....
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
> > This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
> > reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
> > shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
> > Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>
>
> -----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
> shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
> Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm




-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm