RE: IML: Starter in a '66 Coupe

["W.Roddick" <1roscoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Got to go along with that.  I would THINK if they overhauled the tranny, a
new converter (and ring gear) would have been also installed.  All you need
to have happen is some foreign matter lodged in the old converter find its
way into your "new" tranny  :o|

Unless I have missed a message, we still don't know what was meant by
"wouldn't start". 

Bill & Tami Roddick
'64 Imperial Crown 
'72 'Cuda 340
'88 Cherokee Laredo
'95 Concorde


-----Original Message-----
From: mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kenyon Wills
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 8:17 PM
To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: IML: Starter in a '66 Coupe

so that begs the question:

IF, and I say IF, the starter is refusing to engage the  engine, it would
likely be a fault in the teeth on the torque convertor.  

If so, why wasn't that corrected/addressed/caught when the trans shop
rebuilt everything.

Murphy's law says it's something else, so don't go rock and roll on your
trans shop till you're certain, but this is the line of inquiry that I would
follow.  

You may have a responsible party in the form of the trans shop (maybe not,
so careful!).

-K




-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm