1965 BUDD BRAKES ?????

["John M Bittner" <jmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That's why I did want to answer this one. I was under the 
impression that 67 was the first year for disk brakes.
I know my 65 New Yorker has Bendix shoes in front.
John


> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> RandalPark@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:12 PM
> To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: IML: 1965 BUDD BRAKES ?????
> 
> 
> I have always thought that the '65 Imperial had Bendix Brakes.
> 
> Paul
> 
> In a message dated 2/19/2004 11:27:36 AM Eastern Standard 
> Time, "mENTALmOPAR mAN" <collyman1@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >Just a quick question.......... Would a '65 New Yorker have the same 
> >BUDD brakes as a '65 Imperial ????? If so, what sort of 
> things should I 
> >be aware of ???? (regarding discs or drums) THANKS again for all the 
> >helpful advice !!! Michael Howlett Portland Oregon (waiting for the 
> >BIGG April SWAP MEET !!!) 
> >-------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> >---------Dream of owning a home? Find out how in the First-time Home 
> >Buying Guide.----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com 
> >----------------- This message was sent to you by the 
> Imperial Mailing 
> >List. Please reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your 
> response 
> >will be shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for 
> >the Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To 
> >UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
> 
>