IML DIGEST rebuilding 440 in 1968 Crown
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IML DIGEST rebuilding 440 in 1968 Crown



I think there may be some misconception extant about unleaded fuel use, hardened valve seats,and 'pinging'.
 
But  first of all, a well cared for 440 with 114, 000 is a long way from needing an overhaul.  Of course if a compression check shows a problem - then it has to be taken care of.

Second, while unleaded fuel is generally lower octane fuel, it does not mean that the hardened valve seats which are recommended (and then only if the heads are off for machine work anyway) will have any impact on pre-ignition.
 
Engines which are making pinging noises on acceleration due to pre-ignition are telling us that they need higher octane gas and/or a good clean-out of the combustion chamber and/or a correction (retarding) of the ignition timing. 
 
None of this is related to unleaded gas or to hardened valve seats.   One hardens the valve seats to guard against valve seat recession, which is occasionally seen on pre-hardened era engines which are worked very hard with unleaded gasoline.  I have never seen a case of valve seat recession, and I have driven and rebuilt engines for almost 50 years, the last 30 or so on unleaded gas.
 
Dick Benjamin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kate Triplett" <ad_ablurr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: IML: IML DIGEST rebuilding 440 in 1968 Crown

> This thread is of considerable interest to me - I have as yet been unable to obtain any previous maintenance records for my '68 Crown other than the few receipts that "came with" in the glove box. The car does run splendidly with nary a ping on 89 octane gas, though, so I suspect the engine has been through an overhaul once in its life - mileage is now just over 114,000. I try to drive her once a week on my commute of about 75 miles round-trip freeway miles, and she really rolls when you "turn the horses loose", having great compression and engine braking and tons of 440 power.
>
> Did the dealers do a "warranty" change to these cars when the fuel changes took place, or was the timing such that it was strictly after market rebuilding? Did they actuall retime or recam to obtain a lesser compression ratio, or was it just the hardened valve seats thing I have heard about?
>
>  I have excellent reason to believe this car was mostly dealer maintained, at least through the warranty period - the a/c has also been updated, but not by the selling dealership. The abundance of OEM parts makes me think it was only after the original owner died and the car "passed  down" to people with less appreciation for her that things began to get iffy on maintenance. Thank goodness I got her before she slid too far in condition!
>
> Say Ken, where are you and your '68 located? I have yet to see another Imperial of any year on the road in my area, though I know from the list that there are a few! Waiting for summer??
>
> Kate Justet Triplett
> Kate's Custom Gunleather
> Monroe, Washington
> Proudly a member of NRA
> and owner of "Lucille" 1968 Imperial Crown 4-door HT
>
> >Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 09:20:22 -0800
> >From: Ken & Tracie
> <Subject: IML: Compression Ratio & Rebuilding
> >Reply-To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Hello All,
>
> >I would appreciate your opinions, thoughts and experiences with rebuilding a >late 1960s 440 for use with today's gasoline.
>
> >I plan to go with the necessary modifications to accommodate unleaded gasoline. >But what about the compression ratio? Will the currently available 91 octane >"premium" grade work in a  '68 or '69 440 rebuilt to stock specifications? Or >should I have my machinist take the steps required to drop the compression >ratio to 9:1? I know about the tricks such as retarding the timing or using a >water injection system. But I also know that some older engines can be modified >with different distributor advance curves and/or cam shafts with different lift >and duration specs to allow older engines to retain their original performance
> <characteristics with a lower compression ratio.
>
> >Thanks in advance for any replies.
>
> <Ken Josephson
> <'68 Crown Four Door Hardtop
>  
>
>
> -----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
> shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
> Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>
>

Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.