|
The surface that is turned the deepest is very visible
just by looking.It is the outer surface & it looks like quite a bit was
removed. I don't have a thickness gauge to measure them. I don't need them
at the moment. The left front rotor on my car wobbles a bit when you apply the
brakes quickly at highway speed, but they stop the car quickly with no pulling.
Its been this way since I bought the car in 94 & doesn't seem to have gotten
any worse. I do also have a used left front rotor that I bought from Murry Park
with light rust on it. I bought it because of the wobbling, but don;t want to
change it I don't have to.Then, the NOS pair came along.
John
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:41
PM
Subject: Re: IML: Budd brakes...and
stuff
How thick are they? Compare that with the original
thickness of .8775. If
they are within about 25 thousandths of this,
they are probably OK to use.
If they are thinner than that, I'd certainly
try them if you have no
alternative, but be prepared to take them back off
if the brakes act funny.
I don't know what the symptom of too thin rotors
is, but from a fade
standpoint, I can't believe 25 thousandths would make
much difference. If
someone else has tried this and run
into problems, please report!
Dick Benjamin
----- Original Message
-----
From: "jsadowski" <jsadowski@xxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent:
Friday, January 17, 2003 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: IML: Budd brakes...and
stuff
On turning the rotors, it says in the 69 service manual in
bold face print
that they must not be turned due to the close tolerance.
Some say this info
doesn't appear in the 67 or 68 service manuals. I do
know that I bought an
NOS pair of rotors some time ago & still in the
original Mopar boxes. The
seller advertised them as new & never turned.
When I received them, they had
been just recently turned. The seller said
they had some rust & had them
turned. I asked for part of the puchase
price back & he obliged. Since the
surface on one side of one of them
is turned quite a bit deeper then the
other, I'm wondering if they're of
any use at all?
John
----- Original Message -----
From:
d_barker@xxxxxxxx
To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:55 AM
Subject: IML: Budd
brakes...and stuff
Hi,
So,
amongst all this good info on these brakes I wonder if I missed
something.
Do we know for sure what year range the Budds were used and were
they used
exclusively in this range with no other types mixed in? I also
vaguely
remember a conversation about whether the rotors can be turned at
all quite
a while back but I don't remember the end result. Also, When we
first got
ours, my youngest(thinking he wanted to be a mechanic)had the rear
drums
off and when he put them back on, he left off the long spring that
wraps
around the outside of the drum. Don't know why it was taken off,
but,
anyway, I don't know where it went and I'm wondering what it's
purpose is
and if it's really necessary.
Thanks,
Dave
67 Haze Green Sedan
Covington,
Wa.
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com
-----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial
Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages
(and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
-----------------
http://www.imperialclub.com
-----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing
List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and
attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
|
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network