More on Convertible conversion

["Gene Satterfield" <esatterf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Making an assumption that the '64 and '65 are the same I find the following
in the parts book for 1965.

        13-01-0 Frame Assembly
                    Imperial, except conv. cp. up to S/N 129749
p/n   2409 089
                    Imperial, except conv. cp. after  S/N 129749
p/n   2460 999
                    Conv. cp. up to S/N 133026
p/n   2409 090
                    Conv. cp. after S/N  133026
p/n   2460 098

To me it appears that the frames are not the same.
         Hope that this is helpful in your decision.

                    Gene
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tristan Moore" <v-2tmoor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 5:41 PM
Subject: IML: More on Convertible conversion


> Hi Guys
>
> Thanks for the insight.
>
> I checked out the 67 convert on ebay a week or so ago, I would love to buy
> it, but it's on the other side of north America from me, and it's in
another
> country. It would be very expensive to ship that car from California to
Nova
> Scotia Canada where I live.  Sadly I'll have to let that one go I guess :(
>
> Someone mentioned that some of the frame based 4 door HD tops had the same
> underpinnings as a convertible. I have a 1964 Imperial Crown 4 door HD
top,
> and I think it has the same X member, but I'm not sure really. Anyone care
> to comment on this?
>
> Anyway, still interested in some pictures, I just want to satisfy my
> curiosity anyway even if I don't decide to make the conversion. Anyone
wanna
> dig out their digital camera?
>
> Cheers
>
> Tristan
>
>