Re: IML: Imperial truck? or Concept
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IML: Imperial truck? or Concept



My wife has a 2005 Pacifica and loves it. The reason that Pacificas did not sell well was the very stiff competition from Acura, Lexus and Mercedes from their similar (but better) cross over SUV vehicles and because of the very high price of the Pacifica. At that time the Pacifiac was the only domestic vehicle in this class, which is now no longer true. Of course in typical big 3 fashion, DC began to discount the vehicles rapidly alienating anyone who paid near sticker and dropping the resale. The sticker on my wife's 2005 Pacifica Touring (AWD, leather) was over $32k, but I paid under $26K for it in Sept. of 2004 (first month out) which was about what it was worth. Maxed out the Pacifica topped $40K!!!!!!  

Chrysler already has the 300C with the 6.1 L Hemi to continue the tradition of the letter cars. I see it as quite reasonable that they would reinvent the Imperial tradition with a luxury based crossover type SUV. It would have to be bigger than the Pacifica with a V8 and AWD to be remotely competitive in the true luxury market. I would look at the new Mercedes SUV as a model.    

Just my thoughts.


 

----- Original Message -----
From: "A. Foster"
To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: IML: Imperial truck? or Concept
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 23:23:42 -0800


Kle;
I would figure that if Chrysler were thinking of an Imperial truck or
S.U.V that the idea would have been scrubbed long before now. Not in so much
because of fuel prices, anyone who could afford a $60k+ vehicle wouldn't
care, but because they are out of fashion. Remember that vehicle called the
"Pacifica"?, nobody talks about those anymore including Chrysler. Though
technically not an S.U.V in that it wasn't a 4x4, it still had much of the
look and it went nowhere in sales. I would think that Chrysler would have
come out with a truck under it's own name first but as of late they have
only made them under Dodge.
Part of the reason why Ford and G.M, especially G.M, are in such trouble
is that they put all of their eggs in one basket with S.U.Vs and crossovers,
now that the fad is fading they are losing market share. What has helped
Chrysler, as it has at points in the past, is doing things differently and
standing out. What the other two missed is that part of the reason why
people bought S.U.Vs wasn't because of the 4 wheel drive, or because they
were trucks, but because they were primarily rear wheel drive, not
underpowered, and didn't ride like a go-cart. Chrysler obviously figured
this out and brought us the Chrysler 300 sedan, and the Dodge Magnum station
wagon. Just to show how out of it G.M is, they phased out their last rear
wheel drive car in their cheaper makes and had to rebadge a Holden for
Pontiac.
The only sin that I can point to in Chrysler's latest line-up of cars is
the lack of a two door body style, and perhaps a rag top. If Chrysler were
to bring back the Imperial, the 300 series would be a good base for it as
someone suggested, but with a longer wheelbase. They would also need to
spruce the interior and exterior trim; less cheasy plastic and vinyl with
perhaps wood veneer, metal brightwork, and better quality upholstery. Again
I think that they need a two door body style and perhaps think about
offering a limousine and a rag top. I also think that a revived version of
the split grille and sparrow strainers would clinch it.
Best Regards
Arran Foster
1954 Imperial Newport
Needing A Left Side Tailight Bezel and other trim parts
1975 Chrysler Newport
Needs a bunch of stupid little things fixed.

.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Klebert L. Hall"
To:
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: IML: Imperial truck?


> From: "Douglas Nieblas"
> Subject: Re: IML: Imperial Concept due at Detroit!
>
> I seem to remember suggesting that the Imperial be brought back as a high
> end SUV two years ago and almost everyone on the list, at the time,
blasted
> me for having such a "silly idea". Go figure, I may be a visionary. The
next
> thing I'll predict is to do a "Frank Sinatra"type edition. Of course "old
> blue eyes" is a bit passe nowadays. Maybe they'll do a "Kenny Rogers"
> edition complete with a chicken roaster in the back. The showrooms will be
> mobbed. Maybe I'll keep my day job. This prediction stuff is not for me.
Bye
> Folks

I wouldn't say that it'd be a silly idea, either from the perspective of
likelyhood, or the perspective of possible sales.
It would tend to make me extaordinarily depressed if it happened, though.

-Kle.
'69 Crown 4DHT




----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm





----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm





Fred Joslin




Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.