The Forward Look Network | ||
| ||
Tail light to body gasket or not? Jump to page : 1 Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page] | View previous thread :: View next thread |
Forward Look Technical Discussions -> Body, Glass, Interior and Trim | Message format |
56D500boy |
| ||
Expert 5K+ Posts: 9904 Location: Lower Mainland BC | I am getting to the point where I am going to be re-installing the 56 Dodge back-up lights as more taillights (red lenses, two pin sockets, and 1157 bulbs, tied into the existing taillight wiring). As I am getting to the point of installation of the base plate, lens and chrome taillight "cover", I am starting to wonder a) was there never a rubber gasket between the taillight base plate and the body? If so, part number?? b) If no, would it be bad if I added one (closed cell foam)? There was a bit of rust between the taillight base plate and the body when I removed the right fog light the other day (the left fog light was fine). This 58, with missing tail and back-up lights, shows where a gasket *COULD* go: | ||
DepsilonD |
| ||
Elite Veteran Posts: 792 Location: Buena Park, CA | I don't recall there being a gasket, but it wouldn't hurt. I would personally use thin rubber rather than the closed cell foam. | ||
56D500boy |
| ||
Expert 5K+ Posts: 9904 Location: Lower Mainland BC | DepsilonD - 2017-01-30 4:12 PM I don't recall there being a gasket, but it wouldn't hurt. I would personally use thin rubber rather than the closed cell foam. OkaLaDoklee. Agree on the rubber (and not closed cell foam). | ||
StillOutThere |
| ||
Location: Under the X in Texas | Just curious: Why not closed cell foam? | ||
springsweptwing |
| ||
Elite Veteran Posts: 1141 Location: Blackpool, United Kingdom. | Originally they had body mastic sealer applied to the housing and studs, http://amkproducts.com/bulk2.asp?code=8430&title=Sealer | ||
DepsilonD |
| ||
Elite Veteran Posts: 792 Location: Buena Park, CA | Wayne, my thoughts on the foam is that it would create additional pressure on the screws and body and would also create a slightly bigger gap between the body and the tail light housing depending on how much it compressed. But in the end, probably wouldn't matter much either way. | ||
56D500boy |
| ||
Expert 5K+ Posts: 9904 Location: Lower Mainland BC | 56D500boy - 2017-01-30 5:07 PM DepsilonD - 2017-01-30 4:12 PM I don't recall there being a gasket, but it wouldn't hurt. I would personally use thin rubber rather than the closed cell foam. Agree on the rubber (and not closed cell foam). Went to a hardware store today and found a roof flashing made of EDPM rubber. About 3/32" thick. Should be enough to make a bunch of gaskets. Cost about $10. CSA certified Double seal water-tight collars 20" x 20" aprons on all flashings Molded of EPDM | ||
DepsilonD |
| ||
Elite Veteran Posts: 792 Location: Buena Park, CA | Nice ingenuity there! | ||
582drht |
| ||
Veteran Posts: 122 Location: Murray Bridge, South Australia | Hi Guys, I noted that when I took the tail lights out of my 58 Sportsman there was no gasket between the surround and the body however there are gaskets where the tail light wiring comes through. On the other end when I took the headlight buckets out there was a grey mastic between the bucket plate and the body, it was just roughly done by hand and a bit hit and miss. | ||
springsweptwing |
| ||
Elite Veteran Posts: 1141 Location: Blackpool, United Kingdom. | I think the mastic was used mainly in areas that had a uneven surface, as with the 58 Dodge tailights, the area where the tailight goes is very uneven and I would think k you would need quite a thick soft gasket there to seal the lights, plus there is also the studs themselves that have mastic around, in my other post further up, the company in the link, does the Grey mastic in strips and also washer form to go on you're bolts/studs. | ||
Jump to page : 1 Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page] |
Search this forum Printer friendly version E-mail a link to this thread |
(Delete all cookies set by this site) | |