The Forward Look Network
The Forward Look Network
Search | Statistics | User Listing Forums | Chat | eBay | Calendars | Albums | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

58 Custom Royal!
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page]
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forward Look NON-Technical Discussions -> 1955-1961 Forward Look MoPar General DiscussionMessage format
 
hemiviper588
Posted 2014-07-29 12:46 AM (#450837)
Subject: 58 Custom Royal!



Extreme Veteran

Posts: 504
500
I attended the St John Concour Show...great collection of Fw Lookers including an Exner display. Here is one of my favorites...



(rsz_img_2036.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments rsz_img_2036.jpg (105KB - 75 downloads)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
hemiviper588
Posted 2014-07-29 12:48 AM (#450838 - in reply to #450837)
Subject: RE: 58 Custom Royal!



Extreme Veteran

Posts: 504
500
Not a Forward Looker but awesome...La Contesse show car



(rsz_img_2056.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments rsz_img_2056.jpg (89KB - 76 downloads)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
hemiviper588
Posted 2014-07-29 12:48 AM (#450839 - in reply to #450838)
Subject: RE: 58 Custom Royal!



Extreme Veteran

Posts: 504
500
More
Top of the page Bottom of the page
hemiviper588
Posted 2014-07-29 12:51 AM (#450840 - in reply to #450838)
Subject: RE: 58 Custom Royal!



Extreme Veteran

Posts: 504
500
more



(rsz_img_2058.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments rsz_img_2058.jpg (182KB - 78 downloads)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
MoParMan57
Posted 2014-07-29 1:24 AM (#450841 - in reply to #450837)
Subject: Re: 58 Custom Royal!


10025
A spring special car as well.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ram300
Posted 2014-07-29 1:45 AM (#450846 - in reply to #450837)
Subject: RE: 58 Custom Royal!



Extreme Veteran

Posts: 363
1001001002525
Any more pics of the Contesse??
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Lancer Mike
Posted 2014-07-29 1:45 PM (#450904 - in reply to #450837)
Subject: RE: 58 Custom Royal!



500020002000500100252525
Location: The Mile High City
Oh, that Custom Royal is nice! [drool]

I like the la Comtesse too, it was the subject of a concept car thread and National De Soto Club article, but it sure was from the dowdy days in Chrysler! There is no hiding it!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
christine-lover
Posted 2014-07-29 8:17 PM (#450934 - in reply to #450837)
Subject: Re: 58 Custom Royal!



Expert

Posts: 2996
2000500100100100100252525
Location: Sept. 1958
Thanks for the photos. I saw the CRL in the flesh in 2011 at Hershey. Beautiful car with a Tom White restoration!!! Love to see it again someday!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
58 DESOTOS RULE
Posted 2014-07-29 8:30 PM (#450937 - in reply to #450837)
Subject: RE: 58 Custom Royal!



Expert

Posts: 2308
2000100100100
Location: The Bat Cave, Fairborn, OH

Where was this show held, sir? I saw the La Contesse Chrysler in the Walter P. Chrysler Museum on the 11th of July and I was not aware that it was operational. It seems though that it is taken to shows from time to time. Here are the photos I took of this beautiful car. I don't know if you can see it in the one interior shot I managed to take, but the roof appears to have a glass panel in the center that one can see out of somewhat like the skyliner glass panel that Ford had in their 1954-55 cars.





(1954 Chrysler La Contesse-1.jpg)



(1954 Chrysler La Contesse-2.jpg)



(1954 Chrysler La Contesse-4.jpg)



(1954 Chrysler La Contesse-5.jpg)



(1954 Chrysler La Contesse-6.jpg)



(1954 Chrysler La Contesse-3.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments 1954 Chrysler La Contesse-1.jpg (218KB - 79 downloads)
Attachments 1954 Chrysler La Contesse-2.jpg (234KB - 75 downloads)
Attachments 1954 Chrysler La Contesse-4.jpg (267KB - 74 downloads)
Attachments 1954 Chrysler La Contesse-5.jpg (237KB - 87 downloads)
Attachments 1954 Chrysler La Contesse-6.jpg (190KB - 70 downloads)
Attachments 1954 Chrysler La Contesse-3.jpg (206KB - 78 downloads)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
hemiviper588
Posted 2014-07-30 7:20 PM (#451036 - in reply to #450937)
Subject: RE: 58 Custom Royal!



Extreme Veteran

Posts: 504
500
It was held at St Johns Inn in Plymouth Michigan last Sunday.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
kmccabe56
Posted 2014-07-30 8:09 PM (#451047 - in reply to #450937)
Subject: RE: 58 Custom Royal!


Extreme Veteran

Posts: 390
100100100252525
The roof insert on the La Comtesse is immense and perfectly clear. Even with the car parked under the shade of a tree at the Concours, it was easy to tell that it was VERY warm inside that car.

This was my first `in-person' opportunity to see this car. I've seen b&w photos of it for years. Yes, it's pre-Forward Look, but for what it is, it's a very impressive car.

The St.John's Concours was an Exner feast of epic dimensions. One class in particular consisted of one Imperial convertible from 1957 through 1961 lined up chronologically. It was an absolutely magnificent sight.

In addition to all of the cars in the class where that '58 Custom Royal was displayed, there were TWO Sweptsides (One Dodge, one Fargo) in an all truck category.

And then there was the Diablo parked tail to tail with the XNR...........

I seriously filled the memory card in my camera!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
50scars
Posted 2014-07-31 7:49 PM (#451162 - in reply to #450904)
Subject: RE: 58 Custom Royal!


Elite Veteran

Posts: 663
5001002525
Location: Oakley, Ill
I fail to understand why we refer to Pre-forward look cars as "dowdy". Compare the competition to Chrysler products and there is really not much difference in"flash". GM put a little zip into the Oldsmobile Starfires in 1954, and also with the Buick Wildcat, but as far as brightwork, and general shape of the cars, Chrysler was right there with the competition. By 53, Chrysler had them on performance, too, except for maybe Olds 88. Hudson was kind of hot with its Twin H power, but that was a flathead 6, and it was not so much that the car was fast, but that it handled better. Chrysler's hemi starting in 51 was force to be reckoned with. They got it down into Dodge and DeSoto by 53, beating the heck out of Ford and Mercury who still had flathead V-8s. The
Studebaker Starlite coupes were neat, but the rest of the Studebaker line was lackluster. Nash was just funny looking. Hudson was still pushing a car that first saw light of day in 1948.
Compare cars model for model, and you will see that there really is nothing any more dowdy about Chrysler's cars than the competition.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
58 DESOTOS RULE
Posted 2014-08-01 2:54 PM (#451266 - in reply to #451047)
Subject: RE: 58 Custom Royal!



Expert

Posts: 2308
2000100100100
Location: The Bat Cave, Fairborn, OH

kmccabe56 - 2014-07-30 7:09 PM The roof insert on the La Comtesse is immense and perfectly clear. Even with the car parked under the shade of a tree at the Concours, it was easy to tell that it was VERY warm inside that car. This was my first `in-person' opportunity to see this car. I've seen b&w photos of it for years. Yes, it's pre-Forward Look, but for what it is, it's a very impressive car. The St.John's Concours was an Exner feast of epic dimensions. One class in particular consisted of one Imperial convertible from 1957 through 1961 lined up chronologically. It was an absolutely magnificent sight. In addition to all of the cars in the class where that '58 Custom Royal was displayed, there were TWO Sweptsides (One Dodge, one Fargo) in an all truck category. And then there was the Diablo parked tail to tail with the XNR........... I seriously filled the memory card in my camera!

The question of heat that the sun could transmit into the c-o-c-kpit of the car was undoubtedly why Ford dropped their Skyliner glass panel too.Even with the optional privacy sreen zipped into the ceiing, that car was HOT. 



Edited by 58 DESOTOS RULE 2014-08-01 2:56 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
jimntempe
Posted 2014-08-01 6:01 PM (#451306 - in reply to #450837)
Subject: Re: 58 Custom Royal!



Expert

Posts: 2312
2000100100100
Location: Arizona
I think of the pre-forward look cars as dowdy because you can easily picture your grandmother driving to her sewing circle in them and not appear a bit out of place. That's true of all the makes with rare exception.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
d500neil
Posted 2014-08-01 6:38 PM (#451314 - in reply to #451306)
Subject: Re: 58 Custom Royal!



Exner Expert 19,174 posts. Neil passed away 18 Sep 2015. You will be missed, Neil!

Posts: 19146
5000500050002000200010025
Location: bishop, ca
Former company president K.T. Keller insisted that MoPars all have roofs that were tall enough so as to allow a driver to reside while
wearing his hat, and sitting in a proper chair-height seat.


Top of the page Bottom of the page
Chrycoman
Posted 2014-08-02 3:26 AM (#451356 - in reply to #450837)
Subject: Re: 58 Custom Royal!



Expert

Posts: 1819
1000500100100100
Location: Vancouver, BC

Not only did K.T. Keller have minimum standards for the interior, but also the trunk. He apparently had two large milk containers used to ship milk to dairies when he viewed mock ups. Keller would open the trunk, place the two milk containers in the trunk and close the lid. If the lid secured properly, no problem. If the lid did not, the trunk lid had to be raised to make room for the containers. Thus the large trunks on Mopar cars while he was in charge, but those big trunks also raised the height of the car making them look boxy.

And that was the main problem with the 1949-1952 models. They looked boxy and outdated, most years actually looking like they should have been built the previous year. The 1953-54 DeSotos and Chryslers looked good with their lower roof lines, but the 1954 Oldsmobiles, Buicks, and Cadillac had new bodies with wraparound windshields. Thus the one-year old 1954 DeSotos and Chrysler designs were considered old. The smaller 1953 Plymouths (9" shorter than Chev & Ford) and Dodges were stubby looking while the Dodge hardtops and convertibles (11" shorter than Pontiac) were built on Plymouth's 114" wheelbase, 5" shorter than the Dodge sedans. Sales of all 1954 Mopar lines plunged.

Chrysler may have had hemi engines that outperformed the competition, but those boxy cars just did not have the image of power. The V's on the hood just did not eliminate the fact the cars looked like they had flathead engines under the hood. And no automatic transmissions before very late in the 1953 model year. All the competition had automatics by 1951.

The biggest problem with the 1953-54 Studebaker sedans were the hardtops and coupes. Everyone compares the sedans with the hardtops and coupes and not the competitors' sedans. The Studebaker sedans don't do badly against the competition's sedans. Although the 1953 models had not much in the way of chrome trim - a styling theme a decade too soon.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
FIN ME
Posted 2014-08-02 10:23 AM (#451386 - in reply to #450837)
Subject: Re: 58 Custom Royal!



Expert

Posts: 2788
2000500100100252525
Location: USA - KY

Thanks for the photos!

Sounds like that Concours show was one great event. Those cars are great!

Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

* * * This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated * * *


(Delete all cookies set by this site)