|
|
Veteran
Posts: 241
Location: Southern CA | Appears to be a pretty solid car, but who knows without inspection.
https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/item/520197625318773/ |
|
|
|
Extreme Veteran
Posts: 403
Location: California | Too bad they took the fins off after 61. It was all over by then. . |
|
|
|
Expert
Posts: 2007
Location: Branson, MO | Suddenlyits1960! - 2020-10-04 12:06 PM
Too bad they took the fins off after 61. It was all over by then. .
Not to me, I think the '62 has a much cleaner rear end look than the '61. However, the '60 was the best! |
|
|
|
Extreme Veteran
Posts: 403
Location: California | I definitely agree with you about the 1960 model being the best vs the 61. They just got everything right,especially the boomerang tail lights. well expect for the toilet seat! :laugh. I really like the 60 Chrysler “powerflite” has,no toilet seat!
Given a choice between 61 and 62,for me its no contest,I’d pick the 61. I’ve gotta have those fins! I respect your opinion though and am sure lots of folks agree with you and would choose the 62. They just looked weird to me. The design doesn’t work without fins. They were meant to have them. |
|
|
|
Regular
Posts: 61
| Car looks decent, but it’s taken apart pretty far. |
|
|
|
Elite Veteran
Posts: 988
Location: Kansas City, Kansas | I love the big-back-window 4drHT '60-61 Mopars (plus the '62-64 stragglers like this).
Edited by slimwhitman 2020-10-30 2:18 PM
|
|
|
|
Expert
Posts: 1748
Location: Alaska | Why would someone put an adapter and 2 barrel carb on a 4 barrel 413. That's not the way to get better fuel economy, just keep your foot out of it. |
|
|