Re: 62 Imperial 413 Motor Mounts?

["dennis.1963ply" <dennis.1963ply@xxxxxxxxx>]

Gary,

Yes,  my question better asked is if the motor mount on the block is the same and if I use stock motor mounts for either my 63 SF or 68 Dodge D-200 I can use the engine.

Thanks

Dennis C.

On Friday, November 6, 2020 at 7:02:13 AM UTC-7 62-65-mail...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Oh, so you are asking if the 1962 413 from an Imperial will drop into your 1963 Plymouth?

Related, it seems to me if I remember correctly, that  the 1962 Imperial used a "floating power" motor mount that was
different than the 1963 Plymouth B-body. That probably does not matter here.

Thanks,
Gary H.

> -------Original Message-------

> Thanks,
> We will see what other comments I may get. I also have a 1968 Dodge
> D-200 also 383. Both the 383 engines, one in the 63 Sport Fury and the
> D-200 need rebuilding the price of the 413 is reasonable and would be
> fun to have if it is not a problem installing.
>
> Dennis C.
>
> On Thursday, November 5, 2020 at 10:40:10 PM UTC-7 Bill Parker wrote:
>
> > The ears are in the same place IIRC. But maybe someone else knows if
> > that D body would still have had the extended crank rear flange. If
> > so the crank and your transmission won’t play nice together. The
> > cranks in B bodies definitely had switched to the late style crank
> > by 62 so maybe the Imperial and the C bodies did too. Bottom line if
> > it is extended flange, you can put a later (to ‘66 IIRC) 413,426
> > Wedge, 440 crank into your 62 413 and that will take care of the
> > issue. Go later than that and I believe the 67 and up cranks have a
> > larger flange recess (where the transmission input shaft or AT
> > torque converter snout mates up.) There are workarounds but it may
> > be getting into more trouble and expense than what you wanted.
> >
> >> On Nov 5, 2020, at 8:56 PM, dennis.1963ply <dennis....@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> 
> >
> >> Hello,
> >> Does a 1962 Imperial 413 mount the same as a 1963 Plymouth 383? I
> >> saw a listing for a 413 that was reasonable and I'm looking for a
> >> replacement for my aging 383.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Dennis C.
> >

-- 
-- 
--
Please address private email -- email of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car transactions and negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the intended recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone using the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
 
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 1962to1965mopars+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/1962to1965mopars/423f2df7-e105-43c6-ab41-835d2118dfdcn%40googlegroups.com.