Re: First Muscle Car
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: First Muscle Car



Thats what I thought but was mopar the first out with the maxwedge and superstocks and then gm and ford copied with there cars. 



Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7 active, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone

-------- Original message --------
From: 'DAVID HURD' via The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 3/15/19 5:51 AM (GMT-06:00)
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: First Muscle Car

Whatever Chrysler products that received the benefits and went into production the result of the Ramchargers Engineers efforts on the drag strip would certainly fall into the category as muscle cars.  Which really took of starting with the 1962 models that dominated the street and the strip.  Shorter, lighter with big block engines that started Detroit scrambling.  The 1962 Dodge with the 413 Max Wedge Cross Ram was dubbed, “The Dodge that Almost Ate Detroit.”  The Muscle Car era was off and running from there.  


https://www.rodauthority.com/features/hot-rods-you-should-know-the-ramchargers-high-mighty/


David C Hurd
via iPhone

On Mar 15, 2019, at 2:55 AM, Bill M <y1topbanana73@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The mid 50's Chrysler 300's were pretty bad ass cars. Really the start of high performance and nascar.

Bill M 

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, 8:03 PM <glpavlovich@xxxxxxx> wrote:
My thought on the definition of a "Muscle Car" as defined generally by the Bid Three Auto makers and their advertising/marketing arm and the general populace (not necessarily the true Hot-Rodder or engine builder) began with the 1964 GTO.  That being said, 1955-1963 higher horsepower vehicles were not marketed with the same hype or moniker as the heavy sixties advertising conglomerates and were truly cars with stunning power; both in their production year and compared with the reputed "first" 1964 Muscle Car; ie 1957 Chrysler 300C, 1962-64 MAX WEDGE...

Gary Pavlovich

-----Original Message-----
From: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of allant780@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 4:55 PM
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: allant780@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: First Muscle Car

I wouldn’t agree based on the definition of a muscle car, lighter weight, higher horsepower. Higher horsepower and performance upgrades alone does not make a muscle car.......... but I may be biased. lol

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 1962to1965mopars+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 1962to1965mopars+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, 8:03 PM <glpavlovich@xxxxxxx> wrote:
My thought on the definition of a "Muscle Car" as defined generally by the Bid Three Auto makers and their advertising/marketing arm and the general populace (not necessarily the true Hot-Rodder or engine builder) began with the 1964 GTO.  That being said, 1955-1963 higher horsepower vehicles were not marketed with the same hype or moniker as the heavy sixties advertising conglomerates and were truly cars with stunning power; both in their production year and compared with the reputed "first" 1964 Muscle Car; ie 1957 Chrysler 300C, 1962-64 MAX WEDGE...

Gary Pavlovich

-----Original Message-----
From: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of allant780@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 4:55 PM
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: allant780@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: First Muscle Car

I wouldn’t agree based on the definition of a muscle car, lighter weight, higher horsepower. Higher horsepower and performance upgrades alone does not make a muscle car.......... but I may be biased. lol

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 1962to1965mopars+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 1962to1965mopars+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 1962to1965mopars+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 1962to1965mopars+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.