Re: Pertronix

["65" <65val@xxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with Dennis. Check your rotor to make sure spark is getting past 
there to the wires ,and then to the plugs.


Darwin/BC/Canada
--'67 Dart GT 'vert...273/904
--'65 Cdn.Valiant Custom 100 'vert...225/A833----SOLD
http://s41.photobucket.com/albums/e285/65val




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dennis C." <dennis.2914@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" 
<1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: Pertronix


Hello,

If you have a strong spark from the coil to the distributor the
Pertronix seems to be working fine.  It appears you have a problem in
the distributor unrelated to the Pertronix.  I would check the cap and
rotor.

I agree going with Ma Mopar for ignition is a very good way to go if
you want to mount the box on the firewall or try to find a place to
hide it like under the battery tray.

Personally I use the Pertronix Flame Thrower III because it has an
internal rev-limiter and I don't want to see the box.

You may want to call Pertronix and talk to their Tech person, I have
done very well with them in the past when I had a problem.  The person
I talked to was very good at helping me trouble shoot a problem I was
having.

I had the advantage of having a stock distributor, coil and ballast
resistor and I could easily go back to stock to help with the trouble
shooting.

Good Luck
Dennis

On Dec 16, 3:43 pm, Jim Altemose <jaltemo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I know a lot of you have had trouble with the Pertronix Ignitor. Now
> so have I, I think. In my 63 Polara 500 with a 383, a Pertronix
> Ignitor was installed by a previous owner. I'm getting a strong spark
> from the coil to the distributor, but nothing to the plugs, so I'm
> ready to blame the Pertronix.
>
> Any recommendations on replacing it? My first inclination would be
> get a direct replacement and maybe a spare, unless there are better
> options. I looked on Summit and had a little trouble figuring out
> which Ignitor P/N is right for the old 383. Also, there's Ignitor II
> and Ignitor III. Of course these cost more. Is there any advantage?
> Should I upgrade the coil as well as per their recommendation?
>
> As always, thanks for any advice.
>
> - Jim
> Jim Altemose, Long Island, NY
> '63 Polara 500 (Max Wedge)
> '63 Polara 500 (383)
> '65 Belvedere I (Street Wedge)
> '71 Bronco

--
--
--
Please address private email -- email of interest to only one person --  
directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car transactions and 
negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the intended 
recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone using 
the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will 
protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the 
content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and 
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.



--
--
--
Please address private email -- email of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car transactions and negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the intended recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone using the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.