Re: trying pics of wiring diagram 64/65

[<62to65mopar@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Can't think of a hurt offhand, though you should consider Dennis' points and his preference for using a fuse instead of a fusible link. 

Thanks,
Gary H. 

>  -------Original Message------- 
> 
>  OOPs, I MEANT TO SAY , the fusible link WAS NOT included in the 64
>    Neal
>  
>  -- 

>  
>  OK, will adding a fusible link hurt anything even if it was originally
>  included in a 64??
>     neal zimmerman, eugene OR
>  
>  On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:09 AM,  <  wrote:
>  > I'm no electrician, so I would use the 1965 setup with the fuseable link; if that diagram shows how Chrysler did it in 1965 then Ma Mopar had good reason to change from 1964's version.
>  >
>  > While you are at it, consider replacing the electrical connectors in the firewall (bulkhead) connector, and the mating plugs. Details and PN are on http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/techstuff.html
>  >
>  > http://www.allpar.com/history/mopar/electrical.html also reviews the firewall (bulkhead) connector weakness and solution for the ammeter current flow danger. Worth considering as you are now wired. :)
>  >
>  > Thanks,
>  > Gary H. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
To post to this group, send email to 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 1962to1965mopars+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.