Re: Hagerty vs Grundy vs Heacock vs ???
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hagerty vs Grundy vs Heacock vs ???



Well, I just had quite the interesting call with Grundy, and they are
off my list of considerations.

Basically they said that I'm not allowed to enjoy my convertible under
their policy, and I'm allowed to go to or from a show. So if we decide
to take the car out on a nice Saturday to drive around, and we are not
going to a car show, or if we stop and do any 'errands" and something
happens, we're screwed. It's only allowed to be used for "hobby
purposes & exhibition".

Heacock however considers driving around for the day, etc, etc as
pleasure use and is completely covered.

Bill M
65 Coronet 500 'vert http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo62008.html
73 Dart Sport, 00 Cherokee Sport, 05 Ram 2500 CTD, 4WD, QC, LB, Laramie
21 Model T Depot Hack, 92 Accord, 06 Mazda 3



On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Donnie Schanz Jr <dcs426@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ive had Heacock for 11 years. They were the only company that would insure
> my 409 car for what it appraised at. I needed to use an appraiser they were
> familiar with and then no problems. Great service. Prices are not bad. I
> have 5 cars with them.
>
> Donnie
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill" <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <mml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "62-65 Mopar List" <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:13 AM
> Subject: Hagerty vs Grundy vs Heacock vs ???
>
>
>>
>> Anyone have anything good, bad, or indifferent to say about these
>> classic car insurers, or another competitor?
>>
>> I'm hunting for another company as JC Taylor is ticking me off and
>> would like some input on experiences.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Bill M
>> 65 Coronet 500 'vert http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo62008.html
>> 73 Dart Sport, 00 Cherokee Sport, 05 Ram 2500 CTD, 4WD, QC, LB, Laramie
>> 21 Model T Depot Hack, 92 Accord, 06 Mazda 3
>>
>>
>> ----
>> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
>>  directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and
>> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
>> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
>> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
>> signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
>>
>> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
>> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
>> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>>
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations
> as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to
> the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
> reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar
> topic.  Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>
>
>


Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.