Yes, thay are something like that - a little different shape, but the same general design. There has been debate in our group here over which of our cars need these extended hangers, but it looks like mine needs them since the ss springs are shorter, and it wouldn't raise the rear much with the stock hangers. Thanks, Dave --- On Wed, 5/19/10, Gary H. <spigot2039@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Gary H. <spigot2039@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Super Stock Spring Hangers > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > Date: Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 10:06 PM > > Is it something like this that you have? > > http://www.4secondsflat.com/AR015.jpg > AR015 – 1964-65 Dodge B body with Super Stock springs. > 0.250 material. Extra length so the shorter SS springs > will fit this early B body Dodge vehicle. > > Thanks, > Gary H. > > -----Original Message----- > > >I'm in the middle of my rearend and spring swap on my > '64 Belvedere. I have the 2" front spring hanger > brackets that go with the SS springs, but the studs don't > line up exactly right with the holes on the car. There > are 4 studs. When I compare them to the stock hanger > brackets, they line up correctly side to side, but the top > to bottom is off by about 1/8". I'm thinking about > drilling out the holes just enough to get them to fit - > there's no way they'll fit otherwise. Anyone else > experience this? > > > >Dave > > > ---- > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one > person -- directly to that person. I.e., send > parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other > personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the > Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your > privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the > content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. > > >