Steve, My old DC bible corroborates what you said. So it does look like the 3400# are what I should go with. Thanks, Dave --- On Tue, 3/16/10, Steven Charette <stevec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Steven Charette <stevec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: SS Spring thing > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > Date: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 8:25 PM > > Dave, > At the risk of muddying the waters > further, I recall (either in print or at the drag seminars) > that the weights are more of a body grouping than an > absolute value to be correlated with the vehicle > weight. 3000lb springs were intended for A-Bodies, > 3400 lb springs for '62-65 B-Bodies, 3600 for Hemi E-Bodies > and 3800 lb springs for heavier-than-ours 66-71 cars as well > as the '62-65 station wagons. Being "Super Stock" > springs, they were intended for race-weight vehicles as > opposed to "full dressers" with consoles, deluxe interiors, > spare tires, etc. > > Can anybody corroborate? > > SC > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave64 [mailto:lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 8:23 PM > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: SS Spring thing > > LOL - I'm laying back in the weeds just watching because > I'm going the SS route this spring, too! I haven't > ordered anything yet - probably in early April. So I > hope you guys can get some definitive answers by then for > me! Up until this week I thought I was ordering 3800 > lb springs with the 2" extensions for my '64 > Belvedere. Now I don't know what the heck I'm > doing! LOL Now I'm questioning myself over > whether to go with 3400 or 3800 pounders. > > Dave > > --- On Tue, 3/16/10, Paul Lennemann <pjlenn@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > From: Paul Lennemann <pjlenn@xxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: RE: SS Spring thing > > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > > Date: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 6:14 PM > > > > This thread has guys all over the world laying under > their 'B' bodies > > measuring their spring things ;-). Mine are the > SS springs p/n's > > P3690456 & 457, ordered from Jeg's, 3400#. > They measure 20" on the > > front section & 36" on the rear. I was > tempted to report something > > odd just to make everyone's head's spin, but that > would be cruel. > > > > Paul L. > > '63 Sport Fury > > 440/727 > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/ml-lennemann63.html > > > > Steve Mick wrote: > > > > > > Now I'm on a mission! Paul L and some of > the > > other 63 B body owners, > > > could > > > you please send me the front and rear length > diminsons > > of your rear > > > springs > > > . It appears they are different between 64 and > 65, so > > I want to find out > > > > > > what the 63 are. Measure from the hole in the > middle > > of the shock plate > > > to > > > the center of the pins . Thanks, > > ..................................MO > > > > > > > > > {Steve Mick} > > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mick64.html > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "MO ( Steve Mick)" <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 12:04 AM > > > Subject: Re: SS Spring thing > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes Herb, I too thought it was figgered out, > until I > > measured mine. > > > Maybe > > > Rich K would measure his and let us know. I think > his > > is stock length > > > with > > > added leaves-not SS. I am beginning to think not > all > > SS springs are > > > created > > > equal. Could it be that the companys that > use 2" > > spacers be selling > > > shorter > > > springs like say A body SS springs-but heavier > > duty? That would be > > > cheaper > > > for them to stock less springs and make more > money by > > selling the 2" > > > extensions. for B body's. Would they do > > something like > > > that??:-).........................MO > > > > > > > > > {Steve Mick} > > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mick64.html > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Herb" <zephyr9900@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 8:05 PM > > > Subject: Re: SS Spring thing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We had this conversation about 6 Months ago on > the > > board and every one > > > came > > > to an agreement 62 / 63 20 inches no spacer and > 64 / > > 65 22 inches two > > > inch > > > spacer for SS springs to fit. Now MO goes > and > > throws a wrench in the > > > game > > > with a 64 with 20 inch > > spacing. (-: MO was > your > > car an early > > > production > > > car that might have used 63 parts?? The > > conversation was about Layne > > > Grissman trying to fit just the SS springs with > out > > spacers on a 64 and > > > had > > > to ultimately purchase the 2 inch spacers to > have > > every thing align up. > > > You > > > know what they say, never say never! > > > > > > > > > Herb > > > > > > 1956 Plymouth Belvedere 361 > > > 1959 Coronet 326 Poly > > > 1963 Fury 2D/HT 6.1 > > > 1963 Sport Fury Convertible 361 > > > 1970 Challenger RT 440 - 4 Sale > > > 1999 Durango SLT 5.9 > > > 2008 SRT-8 Magnum 6.1 > > > St. Louis, MO. > > > > > > http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo42009.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------Original Message------- > > > > > > From: MO ( Steve Mick) > > > Date: 3/13/2010 8:58:32 AM > > > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: Re: SS Spring thing > > > > > > I measured my stock springs on my 64 Dodge B > body > > yesterday and the > > > front > > > part measured 20" . They must be stock springs, > there > > is no front > > > spacer. > > > Herb is well informed, but something doesn't > jibe--- > > The Question > > > continues...................MO > > > {Steve Mick} > > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mick64.html > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Herb" <zephyr9900@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 7:22 AM > > > Subject: RE: SS Spring thing > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > ---- > > > Please address private mail -- mail of interest > to > > only one person -- > > > directly to that person. I.e., send > parts/car > > transactions and > > > negotiations > > > as well as other personal messages only to the > > intended recipient, not > > > to > > > the Clubhouse public address. This practice will > > protect your privacy, > > > reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune > the > > content signal to > > > Mopar > > > topic. Thanks! > > > > > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion > Guidelines: > > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > > > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. > > > > > > > > > ---- > > > Please address private mail -- mail of interest > to > > only one person -- > > > directly to that person. I.e., send > parts/car > > transactions and > > > negotiations > > > as well as other personal messages only to the > > intended recipient, not > > > to > > > the Clubhouse public address. This practice will > > protect your privacy, > > > reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune > the > > content signal to > > > Mopar > > > topic. Thanks! > > > > > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion > Guidelines: > > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > > > > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to > only one person -- > > directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car > transactions and > > negotiations as well as other personal messages only > to the intended > > recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This > practice will > > protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail > and fine tune > > the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! > > > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one > person -- directly to that person. I.e., send > parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other > personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the > Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your > privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the > content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. > > > >