RE: Plymouth hood ornament?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Plymouth hood ornament?





I always liked those Plymouth hood ornaments, especially since they had designations for the "383" or "426" on them.  Too bad Dodge, like in '64, had no badges or designations as to what engine was under the hood.  Wonder why they didn't?

Mike in New Mexico




 


 

> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> From: wwatson6@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Plymouth hood ornament?
> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 20:40:08 -0800
> 
> 
> 
> Actually, the A poly block was, indeed, a small block in its day. The 
> so-called wide block poly (318, etc.) appears wide due to the heads. Take 
> the heads of an A block and put it beside an LA block sans heads and you 
> would have a hard time telling the two apart.
> 
> And take a tape measure to the two and the differences in actual block 
> length and width is miniscule.
> 
> As to the hood ornament, p/n 2524 200 is for a 1965 Plymouth Fury (Savoy/I, 
> II, III, Sport) with either a slant 6 or 318. Cars with a 383 V8 used 2578 
> 737 which had "383" on it while cars with the wedge 426 used 2578 739 with 
> "426".
> 
> The "B" body Belvedere models (I, II, Satellite) used 2449 861 with a slant 
> six or 273 V8, 2578 733 with "318", 2578 734 with "361", 2578 734 with "383" 
> and 2578 736 with "426".
> 
> The 1964 Plymouths used 2417 713 hood ornament on all slant six and 318 
> engines. They used 2445 161 with either 2445 163 decal ("383"), 2445 164 
> ("426"), or 2445 164 ("361").
> 
> Bill
> Vancouver, BC
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Donnie Schanz Jr" <dcs426@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 6:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Plymouth hood ornament?
> 
> 
> >
> > Don't forget, the 318 was not a small block as we think of a small block. 
> > it was a wide block. I compared that pic of Gary's to my 65 426 part. They 
> > are the same except for the engine size.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Donnie
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "greg solecki" <gsolecki@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 6:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: Plymouth hood ornament?
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> As i remember in 1965 the /6 and 273 were blank,the 318,361,383 and the 
> >> 426 were labeled.
> >>
> >> greg
> >>
> >>
> >> --- On Thu, 3/5/09, Dodger7998@xxxxxxx <Dodger7998@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> From: Dodger7998@xxxxxxx <Dodger7998@xxxxxxx>
> >>> Subject: Re: Plymouth hood ornament?
> >>> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Date: Thursday, March 5, 2009, 6:04 PM
> >>> wasn't there one year that plymouth had where only the
> >>> big blocks were
> >>> labeled, and the 318s and 6s had the same ornament with no
> >>> numbers??????
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> In a message dated 3/5/2009 12:41:18 P.M. Central Standard
> >>> Time,
> >>> dcs426@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> >>>
> >>> 1965 Plymouth only
> >>>
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
> 
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
> 
> 

--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 













Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.