RE: Hamb and Cruisenites

[Marcus Edell <marcusedell@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I was a member for years and also donated alot of money to that bum over there.I know my post is still there about hot rodding 49-62 Cadillac Engines

--
Marcus"Hot Rod"Edell-The RevTones www.myspace.com/revtones www.revtones.net 

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: Lee Sumpter <leesumpter@xxxxxxxxx> 

> 
> Yeah, I can see it happening there. I have never joined or posted there, 
> kinda afraid to. The guys on there can be a bunch of real jerks. 
> However, if you look through all of the BS, there is a lot of really 
> neat historical stuff on there at times. 
> 
> Lee Sumpter 
> 
> Don Dulmage wrote: 
> > 
> > 
> > Well I really got burned on HAMB. 
> > I was explaining to a couple of fellows cam timing and its relationship 
> > to compression pressure and actual compression ratio. One fellow asked 
> > me to enter it in the tech week thing so after some help figuring out 
> > how i did. I even showed them how to make a cardboard device to model 
> > it... Then the tech guy emailed me and said it wasn't technical and had 
> > been disallowed. I dont know how much more techbnical it could have 
> > beeen. I can only assume he dodnt understand it or I was one of the guys 
> > so to speak. I wont lie I was a little burnt. Next time through I was 
> > asked to contribute and wrote "no chance I was already burnt here once 
> > and wont do that again." The head goon wrote me and said "comments like 
> > that will get you thrown out of here." I said "dont bother I will leave 
> > quietly. i dont belong here anyway." With some every second word was the 
> > F word and I dont mean Ford. Stuff has no place in a forum I believe so 
> > I just left . Proabaly i was a bit angry too if truth be known but 
> > anyway that is my HAMB experience. My tech thing by the way despite 
> > being unsuitable tfor tech week as not technical enough is still in 
> > their archived tech. 
> > I too am finding the cuise night deal a bit tiring. Maybe I go too 
> > often. Need to do something else with the car. It is a nicer car to 
> > drive with the 355s for cruisng and my wife is happy now. The new rad 
> > repair and the safety bands are working fine so far as well however 
> > missed Cindy and Jeff at cruise last tuesday. I was the only 60s Mopar 
> > which is not good. 
> > Don 
> > 
> > Author of 
> > Return to Deutschland (True Adventure) 
> > Old Reliable (Mopar) 
> > http://altonapublicschool.faithweb.com/ 
> > 
> > http://seniordragster.bravehost.com/index.html 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
> > 
> 
> 
> ---- 
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly 
> to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as 
> other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse 
> public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume 
> of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! 
> 
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: 
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
> 
--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.