Re: Damn Starter snapped!

[george smith <bt6t4@xxxxxxxxx>]

The "KISS" Rule is worth living by.At least for an
"Old School" guy like myself.I don't have to keep
track of what different yr. part is on my car.It's all
the same.
Just my opinion.
--- "Ben Jr. Morgan" <polara_hotrods@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Dodgers note, looking through your photos Brian,
> it looks as though there is a definite difference in
> the size of that nose. Its hard to tell without
> being there in person and whipping out my
> micrometer, but it sure does look like one's a
> little thicker than the other. This could be a
> simple case of the nose doesn't fit in the hole. The
> only other thing that I could think of is perhaps
> the starter's case was binding on the stud as you
> were tightening it, thus preventing it from sitting
> flush (Yes, even tightening the bolt finger tight
> before installing the nut on the stud can do this).
> There's a lesson to be learned here though, if you
> can't get that starter to sit flush by hand, then
> stuff it back into the box, sit your ass in the seat
> of another car and head right back to the parts
> store, and ignore what anyone else tells you. If it
> doesn't fit, it doesn't fit. Only the person under
> the car with his hands all over it knows.
> 
> I noticed that the teeth on the starter ring looked
> quite marred. I'd be more worried about that before
> even thinking about a new starter. Roll the engine
> over with a socket/breaker bar while watching those
> teeth and make sure there aren't any
> flat/missing/horribly marred teeth on that starter
> ring or else your just going to tear up another
> starter. Pulling a transmission without a lift is
> nasty I know that, but a starter ring is much
> cheaper than going through three or four starters
> before you give up. Besides, while you've got that
> trans out, maybe you'll have a little extra time
> work out that serious oil leak you have too.
> 
> So what was the reason for the new MP starter? I
> know they are smaller, but I didn't see any headers
> getting in the way of installing a correct, reliable
> OEM replacement starter that you wouldn't have any
> modification problems with. Make sure you have your
> basics right. My Boss keeps pounding it into my head
> "KISS". I've had a good Napa premium ($75 I think it
> was, with a good warranty) on my big block for 4
> years now and never had  a problem with it. Updating
> with new technology is nice, and often a good thing,
> but sometimes compatibility issues are just too
> costly and too much of a pain in the ass. I'm not
> looking to offend anyone here, just wondering where
> this is coming from.
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From:
> Dodger7998@xxxxxxx<mailto:Dodger7998@xxxxxxx> 
>   To:
>
1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>   Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 12:10 PM
>   Subject: Re: Damn Starter snapped!
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   I just installed a late model dakota starter on my
> test stand  engine, it has 
>   a 63 361 tranny case mounted to the 440(shouldn't
> matter on the  engine, it 
>   bolts to the tranny, not the engine) and had no
> problems,,,,,,,there  is a 
>   indentation in the bell housing that the nose of
> the starter fits into, if  it is 
>   not started into it properly,  it will cause the
> starter to break if  
>   tightened down, the starter should be able to be
> placed in the proper position  by 
>   hand, and not have to be forced to go tight to the
>  bellhousing
> 
> 
> 
>   ************************************** See what's
> free at http://www.aol.com<http://www.aol.com/>.
> 
>   [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> 
> 
>   ----
>   Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e.,
> send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well
> as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This
> practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total
> volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to
> Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
>   '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
>  
>
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html<http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html>.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e.,
> send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well
> as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This
> practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total
> volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to
> Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
>
> 
> 
> 


George



       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Got a little couch potato? 
Check out fun summer activities for kids.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz 


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.