You are correct on the capacity Sean. --- Sean B <polecat2@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > No, it is an exact reproduction of a 1973-4 B-body > oil pan. It still > wears its big "971" stamping, which is the proper > pan for those years. > I don't know what our original pans look like, but > this pan sure looks > like it was made to go in there. The 1966-72 oil > pans have the sump too > far forward, and the rear of the pan rides too low. > This new pan is > listed with vendors as a "B-RB, stock capacity, > center sump oil pan". > > The capacity of this new pan, I'm pretty sure, is > five quarts including > the filter. George? > > > Don Owen wrote: > > > > Sean/George: > > Is this new oil pan a correct reproduction for > 63-64 big blocks? Same > > capacity, dimensions, shape, and so on? > > > ---- > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to > only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., > send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well > as other personal messages only to the intended > recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This > practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total > volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to > Mopar topic. Thanks! > > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. > > > George ____________________________________________________________________________________ Don't pick lemons. See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos. http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html ---- Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.