Re: Which car from It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World would choose for... |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Which car from It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World would choose for... | Hemmings



What a great article you posted that’s the most comprehensive rundown I’ve ever seen on the intakes. I’m away from home but I’m looking forward to checking my intake when I get back for these subtle variations!

> On Jul 16, 2021, at 2:16 PM, 62-65-mail-list-club@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> That port info seems to light up the correct memory cells Bill.  :) 
> So the 2x4 inline was not used on a 1962 with the 413 MW.  
> 
> By the way there is a discussion of Max Wedge Intake Manifolds   here: 
> 
> https://racehemi.maxwedge.com/topics/intakes.php
> 
> Thanks,
> Gary H. 
> 
>> -------Original Message-------
>> From: Bill Parker  
>> 
>> As I understand it the inline manifold was not put on max wedge engines as the manifold was designed for standard 
> ports but I don’t actually know for sure.
>> 
>>>> On Jul 16, 2021, at 9:57 AM,   wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thanks Bill!
>>> 
>>> I assume such magazine writers are like a lot of people, "good enough" is the standard in a deadline-driven 
> situation,
>>> and let it go. The better ones would favor accuracy over deadline though.  
>>> 
>>> That was probably the mail list conversation I was remembering. I assume what Davis meant was 0 max wedge 
> 1962's
>>> were built with the inline 2x4 intake, but the dealer could take the max wedge manifold off of a 413 Max Wedge 
> and
>>> substitute the 2x4 inline manifold. Is that correct?
>>> 
>>> Happy birthday by the way! :)
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gary H.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> -------Original Message-------
>>>> From: Bill Parker
>>>> 
>>>> The number of max wedge cars of each year Dodges and Plymouths are exactly known and listed in retired 
> Chrysler
>>> exec Darrell Davis’s series of books by their actual VIN’s based 100% on factory records rather than old magazine
>>> guesses, old racer’s tales, and the old (but sometimes true) saw that Mopar made some odd combos when 
> requested.
>>> Now I’m not looking down on “old” having turned 70 this week but still…I always wonder why magazine writers 
> don’t
>>> just check the definitive source.
>>>> 
>>>> I opened my book, “The Complete Guide to the 1962 Plymouth Super Stock Package”, and found that 298 
> Plymouth
>>> Super stock Package (maximum performance package or “max wedge”) Plymouths were built by the factory for the
> 1962
>>> model year. Every one of them is listed by its Vehicle Identification Number and is in a chart showing exactly how it 
> was
>>> equipped. The summary goes on to say that 159 were built with the T-85 manual trans, more than half!  And, 26 of 
> the
>>> total were equipped with the 13.5:1 engine, all in June and July. There were no ‘62 Plymouth wagons built as max
>>> wedges but all of the other possible types are represented.
>>>> 
>>>> I spoke with Mr Davis several years ago and one thing I asked was about 413’s with inline dual quads, as I was 
> trying
>>> to help a list member determine what combination his car was made with. Mr Davis’s answer for that was that there
>>> were zero such cars made at the factory but it was a dealer installed option in the later part of the model year due 
> to
>>> customer demand. Such low numbers like 1 of 50 could mean the writer consulted a list of “currently known” cars 
> in a
>>> registry like that maintained by Mr. Govier.
>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jul 15, 2021, at 2:22 PM,  wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks for the link to the article.
>>>>> 
>>>>> "1 of 50 made" is probably unverifiable. The seller did a cya by noting "Believed to be 1 of 50."
>>>>> 
>>>>> We had a discussion here years ago and I seem to recall that the 2x4 inline was offered as a dealer-installed 
> option.
>>> The
>>>>> parts came in the trunk of the car and the dealer put them on. I think the parts department could also order 
> that
>>> for a
>>>>> customer to install, bit I'm not 100% sure.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hum. But was that dealer 2x4 option only for the 361 big block?  A 413 in a 1962 Plymouth would only be the 
> Max
>>>>> Wedge version, right?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Gary H.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> -------Original Message-------
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Check out the 1962 Plymouth Fury with a 413 and two in line 4’s
>>>>>> In this hemmings article about a movie
>>>>>> Can anybody Verify the  statement,
>>>>>> 1 of 50 made
>>>>>> Mark Evans
>>>>>> https://www.hemmings.com/stories/2021/07/07/which-car-from-its-a-mad-mad-mad-mad-world-would-
> choose-
>>> for-
>>>>> your-dream-garage-part-1?
> refer=hccweekly&utm_source=hccweekly&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2021-
>>> 07-14
> 
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> --
> Please address private email -- email of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car transactions and negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the intended recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone using the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
> 
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
> http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 1962to1965mopars+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/1962to1965mopars/20210716181627.11698.qmail%40server309.com.

-- 
-- 
--
Please address private email -- email of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car transactions and negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the intended recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone using the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 1962to1965mopars+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/1962to1965mopars/22B8CBC9-6C2D-432F-B00E-650267C80FE3%40gmail.com.


Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.