![](http://www.forwardlook.net/images/6265466x44.gif)
Re: new to list; looking for Max Wedge
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new to list; looking for Max Wedge
- From: Bill <hemirr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:17:08 +0000
[AD removed for archives]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you love your country? Get a Free USA T SHIRT click here to
receive your gift.
caacDvPb7yoMza/PermissionData
-------------------------------------------------------------------
To throw in another .02 worth regarding values, as one of the mopar magazine
writers recently pointed out, the early B bodies will probably soften first
in this current spike in values, before later B bodies and E bodies for
sure. I suspect this is because some of the pricing right now, just like
in, what, 1989 or thereabouts, was driven by "investors", not Mopar guys or
even musclecar guys. Heck, everyone knows what a "Cuda" is, most know what
a Challenger or Roadrunner is, and thanks to Ma Mopar for the recent
advertising, now everyone knows what a "hemi" is, so that's what the
investors go for when they don't really know or care about Mopars as cars.
Next, such types generally don't want project cars, but only finished cars,
at least #3 condition (using the conservative Hemmings-style ratings now,
not inflated eBay descriptions).
My max wedge car is one of three "known to exist" according to Govier; that
is, one of three '62 Sport Fury max wedge hardtops. One of the others has
been knocking around for a few years now, offered for sale, languishing,
eventually selling I understand, then offered again by the new owner with no
takers, etc. The asking price has been $7500 for a rolling shell. Now,
I've actually seen copies of the Govier decoding paperwork for that car,
which in comparing the paperwork to my own, does look authentic to me. The
data plate was present, the car was missing the engine, trans, the correct
max perf hood (had a standard hood), and had a '63 instrument panel for a
while instead of '62, which is easily corrected. In the pictures I saw,
both from the fellow who offered it to me after viewing my sections of our
'62-'65 website, and the later eBay pictures, the car is pretty solid. I
don't know all the details, but it took several years, as I understand it,
to sell once at that price, then when it was later offered on eBay, it
didn't sell on the auction (although it was not relisted quickly, so there
may have been a deal off-line for a lower price). Heck, maybe a list member
acquired it, and if so, I'd love to know the details.
I realize that the '62 B has a more quirky appearance than '63, '64, and
'65s, as far as desireability with the general investing public, but still,
I would think that the price, for a real and documented max wedge car, was
pretty reasonable.
By contrast, as some list members may recall, I offered my '68 hemi
Roadrunner for sale last year, in disassembled condition with the body ready
for paint and assembly, with non-matching hemi, trans, and Dana. I
advertised it for a couple of months on Moparts.com, and got many inquiries,
some jack legs and some serious, and sold it for what I considered a good
price, actually making money over the total amount I'd spent on the car
including purchase price, buying parts, etc. The buyer was an acquaintance,
so I was able to observe when he decided only three months later that he'd
bitten off more than he could chew, as he was also in the midst of paying
for a concours type resto on his '69 1/2 Super Bee six pack car. He put the
car back up for sale, again on Moparts.com, and in the first month, sold it
to a Florida fellow for $3000 more than he paid me for it. He felt he
probably still asked too little, as the guy drove up with a trailer, going
only on pictures, 800 miles, with cash in hand and did not dicker on
arrival. Either one of us could have finished up and assembled the car and
gotten substantially more, but my point is it sold quickly, twice, for good
prices in its disassembled state.
I'm not griping about it, I think it is just a fact of life, for the reasons
I've mentioned, that our early B's don't inflate like some of the other
Mopars.
Bill & Kathi Parker, South Central Indiana
'56 Chrysler Windsor; '60 Chrysler Saratoga; '62 Plymouth Max Wedge; '64
Dart convertible; '65 Barracuda \6; '65 Imperial; '68 Barracuda FB 340-S;
'69 Barracuda FB now 360; '72 Cuda '340
[AD removed for archives]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Click here and walk away with your free Chevy collectible.
caacDvMb7yoMzf/PermissionData
-------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
b7yoMz.
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network