Re: Fuel injection
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fuel injection



[AD removed for archives]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Amazing Diet Patch
The fastest - Easiest way to lose weight! Try it now FREE!
caacBBBb7yoMza/MyDietPatches
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Ken, 
 I converted an old Enderle unit for my Hemi. I'm
using an Electromotive Tec II system for the ignition
& fuel brains. I installed bungs in the injection
manifold, I retained the metering block & hid the map
sensor inside to look 'old school'. Bought some fuel
rails & 55lb.hr. injectors & got the old Hilborn air
horns from Kramer's. The whole thing cost me less than
2 grand so far. The only expenses I still have to go
through is the labor charge from the Electromotive
technician who will map it all out for me. He
estimates it to be 6-8 hours labor.
Hammer


 
--- "Westerlund, Ken" <kwesterlund@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Your free subscription is supported by today's
> sponsor:
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
> Save up to 67% on Omaha Steaks + Get 6 FREE Burgers
> and a 
> FREE Cutlery Set + Cutting Board!
>
caacBBEbV9EX2a/OmahaSteaks
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Hi Earl,
> Are you talking about converting to mechanical or
> electrical FI?
> I assume electrical, but you mentioned Hilborn.  
> Thanks,
> Ken
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Earl Helm [mailto:earlh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 10:45 AM
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Old Reliable
> 
> Don,
> 
> The simple answer is fuel injection. I have been
> following a few guys
> who are converting
> to FI. One has a radical 440 with an 8 port Hilborn.
>  After he put the
> fuel injection unit on
> and dialed it in, the drivability was like night and
> day. However, it is
> very expensive, and time
> consuming, since it takes several dyno runs just to
> get into the ball
> park. I would love to do
> in, but I have to many other things going on. Plus I
> love the Ruckety
> Puckety part.
> 
> In fact, he was a bit disappointed with how much the
> injection smoothed
> out the engine.
> The wave of the future. If I want smooth, and
> powerful, that is why I
> have the Mercedes with the V8.
> 
> Earl
> 
> I will be OK. Time is my only problem and if you all
> can wait then I
> have no problem getting it done. The other book
> Return to Deutschland
> has more than enough preoders to offset the cost of
> reprinting Old
> Reliable as i have orders both here and in Europe
> for it. It is just
> that the printer is almost 3 weeks behind on the
> contract for finishing
> the book and I have to pay them when they are done.
> Also There is no
> point in me giving them another order till they have
> completed this one.
> 
> On another note.
> I now have over 14000+ miles on my 63 and winter is
> drawing nigh. We
> might get another month of cruise nights but that is
> about it. I have to
> change the headers as I have a cracked one on the
> drivers side which I
> have repaired twice. I am thinking of pulling the
> 426 and exploring the
> possiblility of getting some tamer drivability while
> not losing any
> power. Modern engines are now doing this and I
> believe it is possible to
> bring an older engine into this new relm / We shall
> see. I have some
> ideas most of which are cam related . 
> It is not that I don't enjoy the current engine
> because I do. It is a
> mindblower to drive and never fails to make me
> smile. It is just that I
> am curious We shall see Don 
> 
> Your free subscription is supported by today's
> sponsor:
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
> Click here and walk away with your free Chevy
> collectible.
>
caacDvMbV9EX2f/PermissionData
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e.,
> send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well
> as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This
> practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total
> volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to
> Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
>
> 
> 
> 



		
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com

[AD removed for archives]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsor a child today through Children International.  
Give a desperately poor child hope for a brighter future.
For only $18 a month you can make a difference!
caacBBFb7yoMzf/ChildrenInternational
-------------------------------------------------------------------

----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 



b7yoMz. 








Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.