They better, be better, at those price's? Either that or I'm out of touch with reality on the cost of Carb's. DJ --- On Thu, 8/26/10, William Harrison <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: William Harrison <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: carb debate > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > Date: Thursday, August 26, 2010, 12:53 PM > The web address is > www.quickfueltechnology.com > > When I was looking for a carb for the 496 stroker I'm > building I ran into the rep for Quick Fuel at a swap meet. > He didn't bad mouth the Barry Grant, Holley or Edelbrock > carb. > He just pointed out the performance results that he had on > a chart and I was sold on the Quick Fuel. > The comparison was ran on the same 440 with each carb by a > dyno shop. > Horsepower and torque was given at the same rpm for each > carb and the Quick Fuel just blew the other carbs away. > Though Quick Fuel paid for the dyno runs on each carb with > the independent shop it was just to confirm what Quick Fuel > had done on their dyno. > The carbs used were in the 750 range. > I bought the 950, which outperformed the 1050 Barry Grants > and Holleys. > Another selling point was that each Quick Fuel carb is > tested on an engine to make sure it works correctly before > being boxed to be sold. > Later > Bill Harrison > 65 Coronet 2 dr post > > --- On Thu, 8/26/10, MO ( Steve Mick) <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > From: MO ( Steve Mick) <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: carb debate > > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > > Date: Thursday, August 26, 2010, 1:37 AM > > > > Bill, --no brag--just fact..right? :-) Haven't heard > of a > > "Quick Fuel" where > > can I get info on them? Thanks,........MO > > > > {Steve Mick} > > http://stevemick.shutterfly.com/pictures#Part%202 > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "William Harrison" <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx> > > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 11:50 PM > > Subject: Re: carb debate > > > > > > Forget the Holley and Edelbrock. > > Go with a Quick Fuel...Based on the Holley but soooo > much > > better. Much > > lighter than a Holley.. > > Made in Bowling Green Ky. > > My opinion is not the only one but it is the right > > one......lol > > Just kidding, so don't get all up tight..... > > > > --- On Wed, 8/25/10, MO ( Steve Mick) <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > From: MO ( Steve Mick) <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Subject: Re: carb debate > > > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > > > Date: Wednesday, August 25, 2010, 4:01 PM > > > > > > Any opinions on this? ...........MO > > > {Steve Mick} > > > http://stevemick.shutterfly.com/pictures#Part%202 > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "MO ( Steve > Mick)" > > > <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 10:21 PM > > > Subject: carb debate > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am trying to make a decision on what carb > I > > want to > > > use (single 4 bbl) Holley or Edelbrock AFB. > Vacume or > > > mechanical secondarys along with other things to > > > consider. I understand Holley a little more, but > guys > > > in the know say they understand Edelbrocks > better > > than > > > Holley! So I would like you-uns opinions brand > choice > > > and why. Demon or other carbs , or special tuned > > > aftermarket are not considered in this question. > > > 413-440 4 speed 3:55 ratio weighing 3800-4000 > lbs. @ > > 55-6000 > > > RPM max. Thanks for any input..........MO > > > > > > > > {Steve Mick} > > > > http://stevemick.shutterfly.com/pictures#Part%202 > > > > > > > > ---- > > > > Please address private mail -- mail of > interest > > to > > > only one person -- directly to that person. > > > I.e., send parts/car transactions and > negotiations as > > well > > > as other personal messages only to the intended > > recipient, > > > not to the Clubhouse public address. This > practice > > will > > > protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of > mail > > and > > > fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. > Thanks! > > > > > > > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion > > Guidelines: > > > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > > Please address private mail -- mail of interest > to > > only one > > > person -- directly to that person. I.e., send > > > parts/car transactions and negotiations as well > as > > other > > > personal messages only to the intended recipient, > not > > to the > > > Clubhouse public address. This practice will > protect > > your > > > privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine > tune > > the > > > content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! > > > > > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion > Guidelines: > > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to > only one > > person -- directly to that person. I.e., send > > parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as > other > > personal messages only to the intended recipient, not > to the > > Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect > your > > privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune > the > > content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! > > > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. > > > > > > > > > > > >