Thanks - I'm now looking for a complete brake setup to use instead of what I have. By the way, I now see that the drums aren't a match either! One is 11 x 3, and the other measures out to 11 x 2 3/8 (would that be considered 2 1/2, or is this yet another different size?). I took it for granted that the brakes were 11 x 2 1/2 because I saw what was left of the car the rearend came out of. It looked like a '68 GTX (which it was said to be), but if it was, I now know that some things had clearly been swapped out over the years. Thanks for all of the help, guys. Up until a year ago, it had been 25 years since I worked on these old Mopars, so sometimes I need help remembering what's what. Still having fun, though! Dave --- On Thu, 5/27/10, Mike and Linda <miclinmopar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Mike and Linda <miclinmopar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: 11" x 2" Brakes? TAKE 2! > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > Date: Thursday, May 27, 2010, 2:58 PM > > The shoe, drum and backing plate are all sized as a > set. Don't mix and match here. The backing plate > centers the web of the shoe with the center of the WC > piston. The back edge of the shoe rides on the six > "pads" of the backing plate, and the front edge of the shoe > is near the inside edge of the drums brake surface. > The offset of the drum (hub face to back edge) is also a > consideration. With a drum that is too deep (for 2.75 > width), it won't sit of the hub flange since it will hit the > backing plate first. Basically, its all a matched > set. > > The WC should be the same bore for all there. > Increase braking will come from more friction material > contact area rather than more pressure from the WC. > The servo (self wedging) motion of the shoes will also > dramtically increase braking force. > > I use 10x2.5s on the A bodies rear when I do a disk upgrade > with a 8.25 or 8.75 rear. With the additional weight > of the B bodies, the 11" rear is a good bet. > > I'm just fiinishing up a set of 11x2.5 shoes, backing > plates and drums. Sandblasting / priming / painting the > parts. The "inside" hardware is also getting the resto > treatment.. > > Mike > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave64" <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 11:02 PM > Subject: Re: 11" x 2" Brakes? TAKE 2! > > > So do I want to get different backing plates to stick with > 2.5" shoes, or take the easy way out and go with the 2" > shoes? The 11x2 shoes are still an upgrade over my > stock 10", and I'm sort of in a hurry to get the thing > rolling again. Also, are all of the 11" drums the > same? The 2" aren't supposed to have narrower drums, > are they? I would think it wouldn't matter if the > drums are wider anyway - right? > > Thanks for the help guys! > > Dave > > --- On Wed, 5/26/10, Mike and Linda <miclinmopar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > From: Mike and Linda <miclinmopar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: 11" x 2" Brakes? TAKE 2! > > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > > Date: Wednesday, May 26, 2010, 6:50 PM > > > > I just did a quick Rock auto search. handy website, > > really. > > > > Under the 1965 Monaco; it came with 11x2 rear drum > brakes > > standard: Raybestos 334PG. HD and Wagons got 11x2.5", > > 335PG out back. > > > > More specifically: > > > > 337PG are the 11x2.75 standard front drum brakes used > with > > 334PG 11x2 rear. > > 336PG are the 11x3.00 HD front brakes used with the > 11x2.5" > > rears. > > > > Mike > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave64" <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx> > > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 6:14 PM > > Subject: 11" x 2" Brakes? > > > > > > > > > > First, sorry this a little off topic. I now have > > the "new" rearend and SS springs transplanted into my > '64 > > Belvedere. All that's left are the brakes. All > > was moving along swimingly until I found that the new > shoes > > I have are 11" x 2 1/2" (as I thought they should be), > but > > the shoes that came off this new rearend are 11" x 2" > > Huh? The rearend is supposed to be off a '68 GTX, but > > I don't think 11"x2" are correct for that car. The > > shoes I have won't work because they don't line up > with the > > pivot pin at the top of backing plate or with the > wheel > > cylinder (the shoes are too tall). Otherwise they're > > dead ringers for what was on there. The wheel > > cylinders are new (for a '68 GTX), and they look > exactly > > like what was on there and fit fine. It looks like I > > either have to get different backing plates or figure > out > > what shoes I need to work with the ones I have. Anyone > have > > any ideas on what cars came with 11"x2" brakes? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > > Please address private mail -- mail of interest > to > > only one person -- directly to that person. > > I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as > well > > as other personal messages only to the intended > recipient, > > not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice > will > > protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail > and > > fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! > > > > > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion > Guidelines: > > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to > only one > > person -- directly to that person. I.e., send > > parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as > other > > personal messages only to the intended recipient, not > to the > > Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect > your > > privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune > the > > content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! > > > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one > person -- directly to that person. I.e., send > parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other > personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the > Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your > privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the > content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. > > > > > > >