Re: 11" x 2" Brakes? TAKE 2!

[Gary Wilson <Gwwilson67@xxxxxxxxx>]

Drum should match the with of the brakes.  Backing plates should also match.  I took mine frrom a 69 Chrysler that had 11 in brakes.  I put the whole system on.  WOrked great.  



----- Original Message ----
From: Dave64 <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx>
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wed, May 26, 2010 8:02:40 PM
Subject: Re: 11" x 2" Brakes? TAKE 2!

So do I want to get different backing plates to stick with 2.5" shoes, or take the easy way out and go with the 2" shoes?  The 11x2 shoes are still an upgrade over my stock 10", and I'm sort of in a hurry to get the thing rolling again.  Also, are all of the 11" drums the same?  The 2" aren't supposed to have narrower drums, are they?  I would think it wouldn't matter if the drums are wider anyway - right?

Thanks for the help guys!

Dave

--- On Wed, 5/26/10, Mike and Linda <miclinmopar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Mike and Linda <miclinmopar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: 11" x 2" Brakes?  TAKE 2!
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wednesday, May 26, 2010, 6:50 PM
> 
> I just did a quick Rock auto search. handy website,
> really.
> 
> Under the 1965 Monaco; it came with 11x2 rear drum brakes
> standard: Raybestos 334PG.  HD and Wagons got 11x2.5",
> 335PG out back.
> 
> More specifically:
> 
> 337PG are the 11x2.75 standard front drum brakes used with
> 334PG 11x2 rear.
> 336PG are the 11x3.00 HD front brakes used with the 11x2.5"
> rears.
> 
> Mike
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave64" <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 6:14 PM
> Subject: 11" x 2" Brakes?
> 
> 
> > 
> > First, sorry this a little off topic.  I now have
> the "new" rearend and SS springs transplanted into my '64
> Belvedere.  All that's left are the brakes.  All
> was moving along swimingly until I found that the new shoes
> I have are 11" x 2 1/2" (as I thought they should be), but
> the shoes that came off this new rearend are 11" x 2" 
> Huh?  The rearend is supposed to be off a '68 GTX, but
> I don't think 11"x2" are correct for that car.  The
> shoes I have won't work because they don't line up with the
> pivot pin at the top of backing plate or with the wheel
> cylinder (the shoes are too tall).  Otherwise they're
> dead ringers for what was on there.  The wheel
> cylinders are new (for a '68 GTX), and they look exactly
> like what was on there and fit fine.  It looks like I
> either have to get different backing plates or figure out
> what shoes I need to work with the ones I have. Anyone have
> any ideas on what cars came with 11"x2" brakes?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Dave
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person --  directly to that person. 
> I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well
> as other personal messages only to the intended recipient,
> not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will
> protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and
> fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> > 
> > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
> person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send
> parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other
> personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
> privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
> content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> 
> 
> 
>