I believe it's 68 and later for the change in hub size and spline count. On 4/16/2010 11:16 AM, chymar01@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
It's '67 and later. Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: Dodger7998@xxxxxxx To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 9:09:48 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: New Project Hmmm,,,,,,,,guess I am not following this, it was my understanding that aftermarket convertors were the same from like 66 to early 80s, and it has been a standard to replace the input shaft on our early cable shift trannys to accept the latter TCs ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Please enlighten me,,,,,, In a message dated 4/16/2010 12:36:14 A.M. Central Daylight Time, chymar01@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: The crank center register for the torque converter is a different size(larger) on the 340 than the 318. Someone used to make an adapter/spacer to make up the difference. If you only have the 340 block, use the 318 crank and rods. The crank is forged and the rods are bushed for floating pins. Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nico Over"<nover@xxxxxxxx> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 8:50:19 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: New Project Ollie, actually that is not a bad idea. I have a 68 340 block but it is 60 over so don't know if it is still usable. Let me do some thinking on this. Question will the 65 318 poly trans bolt to a 68 340 block? Thanks Nico On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:31:34 -0500, Ollie wroteNico, I will probably get hammered for this one....... If I was redoing another vehicle, unless it is a super stocker; I would very seriously consider going with a 340 vs 440. my reasons more user friendly fuel wise/ daily driver less common eng/we are rapidly approaching the 440 show in our Mopars, i.e. the 350 ch***y in everything better fit / less cooling problems Just my $ .02..presented free of charge Ollie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ollie"<satellite1965@xxxxxxxxxxx> To:<1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 4:01 PM Subject: Re: New ProjectThe rocker chrome on the Bel was a much smaller piece than theSatellite.The Satellite is as wide as the rocker itself. Ollie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nico Over"<nover@xxxxxxxx> To:<1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 3:17 PM Subject: Re: New ProjectThanks Ollie for the info, my Bel II has side and rocker chrome with bench seats. The 318 is seized but am intending to put a 440 in it anyway. Nico On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:56:20 -0500, Ollie wrote65 Satellites did come with bench seats. To my best knowdlege the production #'s 13,139 w/interior chrome and bucket seats 9,663 bench seats and no interior chrome 1,837 convertiables 254 426 ci automatics 23 426 4 speeds As John said Satellites had no side chrome, but wheel well and rocker panel chrome, plus the rear side "shark gills" They were an up graded Belvedere, I and II being post and no post cars. Ollie ----- Original Message ----- From: "John"<jswask@xxxxxxx> To:<1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 1:42 PM Subject: RE: New ProjectNico, Also the belvedere II had trim down the sides, why'll theSat.only had shark gills on the rear qtrs.and had trim on the top edgewere thewindow comes out of the door., where you would rest you arm as you would be cruising John Wask...To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx From: ledman_70@xxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: New Project Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:16:59 +0000 Satellites generally had console/buckets, but that may notALWAYShave been the case. Nico Over wrote:All, I am not an authority on the 65 cars by any stretch andaftercleaning out all the parts in the car I found a emblem that saysBelvedereII so I guess it is not a Satellite, don't really know what thedifferencebetween the two models are except maybe the Satellite was the upperscalemodel for the model year?? Anyone, can you enlighten me. Thanks Nico On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:23:09 -0700 (PDT), Donald GallimorewroteAnother '65 Satellite Convertible owner. Let me know if youneedany reference photos, etc. Akron Don Gallimore ----- Original Message ----From: Rich Kinsley<rlkinsley@xxxxxxxxx> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx Sent: Thu, April 15, 2010 10:20:03 AM Subject: RE: New ProjectGood for you! Gee I love wagons and yours is just like myfolksused tohave but it had a 2bl 383. Quite a runner! Rich Kinsley '64 DodgePolara 4dr 318poly w/goodies=====================================================================NicoOver wrote: Just wanted to let everyone know that yesterday I accidently acquired another project car. While delivering some stuff to a guy's business, I spottted a 65 Plymouth Satelite convertible sitting in a shed. I asked what he was going to do with it and he said its going to the junk yard. I said you can't do that and he offerred the car to me for $100.00. So now I have a almost complete 65 vert, 318 auto. Pans seen good but has some cowl and qtr panel rust. Wife says something has to go so if anyone needs a 63 Dodge 9 passenger wagon or parts I'll make a heck of a deal, pls contact me off list. Another one saved! Nico Over Virginia Beach, Va. 63 Dodge 330 2dr post 440 63 Dodge 440 wagon 64 Plymouth Sport Fury 451 4 spped 65 Plymouth Satelite 318 vertRich Kinsley '64 Dodge Polara 4dr 318polyw/goodies---- Please address private mail -- mail of interest toonly one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only totheintended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address.Thispracticewillprotect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail andfinetune thecontentsignal to Mopar topic. Thanks!1962 to 1965 Mopar ClubhouseDiscussion Guidelines:http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html andhttp://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.---- Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactionsandnegotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail andfinetune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html andhttp://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. --^----------------------------------------------------------------This email was sent to: nover@xxxxxxxx EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: help/unsub.html.bm92ZXJA For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutionsvisit:Jeff Adams 64 Polara ---- Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only oneperson --directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to theintendedrecipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practicewillprotect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and finetunethe content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html._________________________________________________________________ The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiplecalendarswith Hotmail.http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID28 326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5-- [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ---- Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person
---- Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.