
Re: converter
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: converter
- From: "Harold (Dooner) Funderburk" <funderburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
Don,
Thanks for clearing that up for me. I thought the
engine had to rev higher than a stock converter, so
you will be more in to your engines power range.
So when just daily driving and cruisin at low speeds
(stop and go), it won't sound like the transmission is
slipping. Is that correct?
What are the benefits if you used one on mild (400hp)
engine? Only street, no strip. Maybe leaving a chevy
and ford in the dust at a stop light every now and then.
Harold (Dooner) Funderburk
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
This email was sent to: arc.6265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
bSONJP.
Or send an email to: 1962to1965mopars-unsubscribe@
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network