
Re: [Chrysler300] Brake Fluid for a 300F
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chrysler300] Brake Fluid for a 300F
- From: "paul paulholm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300]" <Chrysler300-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:58:38 -0400
On 3/25/2020 3:51 PM, 'Steve .' saforwardlook@xxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300] wrote:
>
>
> I was not intending to necessarily blame the fluid yet. It is just that
> over the years I have heard so much back and forth about the wisdom of
> using silicone fluid in our cars that I just wanted an expert's opinion
> based on having worked on so many of these older cars than anyone else I
> know or have heard of that has more experience and capabilities. He is
> the guy that has to fix the failed parts and takes them apart to
> understand the failure mechanisms and should have the most experience of
> anyone I have known or have heard of. So I just shared it.
>
> I have also discussed this issue with a Toyota engineer in the past, and
> Toyota research itself had concerns about the use of silicone fluids in
> automobiles, but I was unable to gain the specifics.
>
> I would like my F to remain reliable so I can keep it all original, but
> with one single pot up front and really nothing else of use to stop the
> car if the brakes go out at speed, it concerns me enough to ask the
> experts. It seems where there is some smoke, there may be fire. This
> whole discussion of silicone fluid never seems to go away with a
> definitive conclusion. You can apply engineering principles and
> reasoning forever but it isn't a reliable answer either given the
> anecdotal evidence to the contrary.
>
> I was just sharing an opinion, and that was all. I have no conclusions
> personally.
>
> I would also like to know why the automotive industry doesn't use
> silicone for brake systems in new cars? It seems ABS brake systems in
> newer cars don't go the distance with glycol either, so why no changes?
>
> I also have had a 1989 Dodge Dakota for 31 years now and have never had
> to replace any brake components that rely on glycol to function and it
> has 200K miles on it now. I just flush the system every 4 years or so -
> what is different about the system on that vehicle such that replacement
> components on our cars can't incorporate the same metalurgy/seal
> technology?
> There are many more questions rather than clear answers on this subject,
> which is frustrating.
> Steve
SIMPLE ANSWER the Bean counters!!
--
Paul Holmgren
JCI #74145
"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is
no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress."
Samuel Clemens
------------------------------------
Posted by: paul <paulholm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
------------------------------------
To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or
go to https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/all/manage/edit
For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylang
------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
Chrysler300-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Chrysler300-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network
Archive Sitemap