Re: [Chrysler300] Delta Wing Air Cleaners
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chrysler300] Delta Wing Air Cleaners



Hi John,
When the Desoto Fireflite went across the block, the announcer stated "This Desoto is equipped with the Adventurer dual carb setup, but the batwing air cleaner looks like it was from a Cadillac." He obviously knew very little about Chrysler cars (he knew every detail about the Corvettes & Mustangs, though).  That's when I sent an email to Speed. My email stated that "In 1956 the dual quad setup was standard on the Adventurer and 300B, and the batwing air cleaner was correct for those cars. That's where Cadillac got the idea."

When they showed the engine bay while the car was on the block, it appeared to be a two-carb setup, but the picture they have on their web site clearly shows only one carb. Still, it was a beautiful example, and the bidding reflected that. I was surprised that the next car in line, an Adventurer hardtop, didn't bring nearly as much money. I guess it's true that when the top goes down the price goes up.

Best regards,
Mark Souders
300H
Mohrsville, PA





-----Original Message-----
From: John <john@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mon, Jan 24, 2011 10:49 am
Subject: [Chrysler300] Delta Wing Air Cleaners


Over the weekend I watched some of the B-J auction on the tube.  I did see the 
56 DeSoto Fireflite convertible that came across and brought $335,000.  When 
he hood went up there was a Delta Wing and immediately I knew this was not 
orrect to this car.  What I've since learned is that this example still retains 
 single WCFB and the two original mounting ports on the bottom side of the 
ilter were filled in and then a new one created to mount to the single carb.
Statements were made and the announcers didn't seem to have much knowledge on 
hese Delta Wings.  I did hear the name of one 300 Intl. club member that had 
-mailed with some info regarding the DeSoto and it's one year use of the Delta 
ing.  The implication I got was that the announcers were stating that these 
nits didn't start until 1956 and that is incorrect.  I was also surprised that 
one of them knew the manufacture of all of them in the era.
To ad a bit more on this I've attached an article I wrote some years ago and was 
ublished in the Chrysler 300 International Club's Newsletter.  For those of you 
hat are not learned on the subject this may be of some benefit.  If not, simply 
ush your delete button.
John Lazenby
 
HRYSLER C300 & 300 B
DELTA WING OIL BATH AIR CLEANERS
by
John Lazenby


 was asked by Andy Mikonis to write this article in reference to questions and 
eplies that were in recent e-mails on the club's list server. First I must 
tate that I'm sure I don't have all of the facts as things are constantly being 
earned regarding our Letter Cars. Keeping that in mind this is what I can 
ffer. The common name for them is "Batwing", but Delta Wing is actually 
orrect.


irst, I'm fortunate to own examples of both a C300 (3N551881) produced April 
3, 1955 and our 300B (3N561382) built February 17, 1956. Now for comparison the 
300 is just about mid way through the production numbers of the '55 model where 
he '56 is around 35% through the run of B's.


t always amazes me on how many people think these cars are pretty much the same 
xcept for the fins being grafted on the B. Over my years of ownership and 
aving these two cars sitting beside each other in my garage I'm constantly 
inding differences. Some very suttle and some not so. I guess I could write 
any stories about each of these, but for this one I'll just stick to the Delta 
ing.


n the process of restoring our B and having at that time just purchased the 
300 I was working on both at the same time. I ended up taking both Delta Wings 
o my painter at the same time for metal work and paint. It was not until we 
tarted looking at each piece that the differences came to light.


ow I've pretty much been of the opinion that the B is a better car than the 
300 simply because there was time to work out issues with the earlier example. 
ey C300 owners don't get me wrong as I love those also. Andy uses this same 
heory on the F / G relationship and refers to the F as the "proto type G". I 
till hold to my opinion on this with the exception of the Delta Wing.


he difference is not in the wing, but in the pods themself. We discovered at 
he paint shop that the two pieces of the pods, an inner and outer will not 
nterchange year to year. Also it was discovered that the guts of each was 
astly different. The C300 is more detailed in the construction and the actual 
iltering contents seems to be much thicker with far more construction to hold 
t in place. I guess from a performance standpoint maybe this is why the change 
as made as it might have been more restrictive. 


he wing itself is the same from everything that I've been able to learn. Delco 
roduced these units for several cars during this era. They were Caddy Eldos, 
ackard Caribbeans, De Soto Adventure's in 1956 only and certain Chevy's. 
ossibly there are more, but these are the ones I've personally seen. The major 
isible differences in all of these is the wing. Only the Chrysler version has 
he four ribs running fore and aft. The location of the pod holes are different 
nd also the necks to the carbs and the spacing associated with them. Makes me 
onder what the inside of the pods look like. Next time I encounter any of these 
t a swap meet I'll do my best to look and report the findings.


ther interesting facts are that some examples are mounted 180 degrees from what 
he Chryslers are which looks really strange I think. Also they used a variety 
f attaching hardware that looks like it should be in a 1950's kitchen. In 
losing I would say the next time you find one of these rare items be sure you 
now what you are buying before you realize it won't work. Happy hunting !!




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or
go to http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join and select the "Leave Group" button

For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm

For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylangYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    Chrysler300-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Chrysler300-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network Archive Sitemap


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.