Rich Barber ask the question what size the tires are and if I used tubes. Currently the car is not available and I can't remember the tire size at the moment. I did use radial tubes due to the wire wheels. Yesterday shortly after I posted my e-mail I was involved in a rather substantial head on collision in my beloved Mercury Mountaineer. Seems that a Ford E350 Econoline van weighing probably 10,000 pounds decided to make a left or U turn directly in front of me. It occurred so fast I didn't even see him and never got to apply my brakes. Fortunately I was only doing 20 to 25 MPH. Both air bag deployed, but even with that my sternum went into the steering column and my rib cage caught the steering wheel rim. I was able to exit the vehicle, but was stunned. Parametics responded and I was checked out. I opted not to go to the hospital, but do have an appointment with my Dr. this AM. No sleep last night and very sore today and I fear that my Mounty will be a total as there is no front end left. Even at that low speed I think I pushed his vehicle four to five feet. EVERYBODY, wear your seat belt and be aware of what is going on around you as it might save your life. John Lazenby ----- Original Message ----- From: Lettercars@xxxxxxx To: john@xxxxxxxxx ; awrdoc@xxxxxxxxx ; cpaviper@xxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 10:21 AM Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300F Tire questions - again! John and All: Unfortunately Diamondback does not make the proper size tire (radial) for the 300F yet. However it is great to hear of unqualified satisfaction with a product. Perhaps I will suggest (demand??) that Universal replace my tires with Diamondbacks when they are available. Thanks, John. 300ly, Gil In a message dated 8/12/2009 12:42:03 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, john@xxxxxxxxx writes: About four months ago I finally purchased my first set of wide white radials and installed them on our '57 300 C with the factory 15" Motor rim & wheel wires. The brand I chose was Diamondback as I've heard from several car friends how please they were. The Diamondbacks have been flawless in performance and I truly enjoy driving the car once again. As I recall cost was close to $800 for the four installed. A lot of money, but the look and ride are well worth the funds spent. John Lazenby ----- Original Message ----- From: lettercars@xxxxxxx To: awrdoc@xxxxxxxxx ; cpaviper@xxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 9:02 AM Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300F Tire questions - again! Tony, Noel and All: Gil Cunningham here. I sure wish I could report all was well with my Universal AC tires, but, unfortunately such is not the case. As Tony mentioned, while up in PA at the meet I stopped by the Universal Tire place in Hershey because their tires I had mounted and balanced here in Tallahassee did not ride as smooth as I felt they should. There were far more "vibration" areas than with the 30 something year old B.F. Goodrich Silvertowns that I had used to attend four meets. (Given to me by member Terry McTaggart!) Of course, those were bias ply tires---if that should matter. I must state that the Universal people were extremely willing and anxious to help. No complaints in that department at this time. They ended up changing out 3 of the 4 new tires (1000+ miles on them), mostly because the sidewalls did not look right. (raised areas, both radially and circumferentially. .I personally watched all zero out on the balancer. They even took the precaution to put the two which showed a little run-out on the rear. I worked along with them. On the way back to our hotel, I did feel there was definite improvement, especially at highway speeds. On the way back to Florida, however, it became increasingly evident that the vibration, if anything, was worse in the mid-speed ranges, and was most noticeable and annoying when the road was smoothest! Definitely unacceptable, and far worse than that SET of radial tires I bought for the 300H at Discount Tire many years ago for $95.00 (Plus tax, of course!) That is not a typo---$95.00!! They have served very well while driving to many meets and hardly look worn. Anyway, that is my story. I called Universal after we arrived home and explained the situation, but did not ask for anything specific, and nothing was offered. I have not driven the car since, so don't know if some miraculous "healing" has taken place while it has been resting. Ha. I guess I will give it another test drive and then write Universal a letter. What to ask for? Coker replacements? Afraid of them yet. My B.F.G.s are long gone (worn out anyway). Maybe another balance? Go back to bias? Don't know. So no, I can't recommend Universal ACs I am sorry to say. They do look great. Makes me wish the car was a trailer queen--- then I wouldn't care. 300ly, Gil In a message dated 8/11/2009 8:04:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, awrdoc@xxxxxxxxx writes: There are well over 100 sets of Coker 235/75R14 on our cars today. Generally, they require alot of lead to balance. They have not been any of the other problems that have been associated with other size Coler tires. The ride and steering on mr "F" conv have been great at all speeds. My only problem recently was after having the tires rotated front to back. Radial pull occurred and had to swap the right to the left to have the car track straight again. The American Classic tire is not the same. Actually it's tread is oh so 70's Michelin and exremelt handsome. I personally had to get the 100 pre sell orders in order to get Coker to make this size. With that said, I would prefer the looks of the AC tire as my next choice. Hope Gil Cunningham chimes on on this discussion since he recently put a set of AC on his "F" conv and drove from FL to PA and back. He reported some vibration at high speeds and had a couple of tires swapped out at an AC dealer in Hershey PA. Hope Gil will report whether or not the AC are performing well and if he would recommend them. Tony cpaviper@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > After reading the Club emails over the past few years discussing tires - I'm still trying to zero in on what to buy for our F Coupe. > Re Coker, I'm still hearing issues - just about every Coker-related message talks to problems with balancing, and that they've hopefullly resolved their structural integrity issues. Re American Classics, their website gives no info - just refers to Coker, Universal, Lucas as distributors. Comparing the Coker and American Classic P235/75R14s, the load capacities, tread widths, section widths and overall diameters are identical - only Co ker catalog's UTQG (Uniform Tire Quality Grade) ratings differ between the 2 "brands " (American Classic's 540BB rating is apparently better than Coker's 400BB rating) and the Coker tire price is a few bucks more. Sounds like we're still unclear whether American Classic and Co ker are one and the same tire - the tread patterns in the catalog photos appear identical. > I called Diamond Back this morning and spoke with one of their sales reps, Jim. He advised that there's no current maker of a quality P235/75R14 tire today - could be a dig against Coker? He did say that they're working on a 75 series 14" radial that will approximate the tire size we're all looking for. They just received their first test version of it, are were not at all pleased - he estimates that any such tire won't be ready to market until next summer [2010] or later. > He did offer up the following suggestion, and I'm wondering if any of you have tried this. Diamond Back sells a European Metric tire that's also used on vans and light trucks, and that he says works very well in automotive applications. He says handling and road noise are very good. The tire's height is 27.3", vs Coker's 27.87"; tread width of 6.3" is the same as Coker's; cross-section of 8.5" is 3/4" narrower than Coker's 9.25"; it's a 6-ply tire rated at 2464# vs Coker's 1930#, is manufactured by Federal, and it replaces 225/75R14 - is described on Page 6 of their 2009 catalog. The tire does come in a 2 1/2" wide whitewalls. > Is anyone out there running these tires? Or had any experience with them? > And there's also the continuing debate re installing new rims. Diamond Back's website quotes the 12/6/07 Old Cars Weekly article that we saw on our Club website a few months back, and says the claim is bogus, that there's no alloy difference, and no markings on rims to indicate use with bias or radial tires. DB's argument in fact states that radials absorb more impact and are therefore less stressful on rims than are bias ply tires. Any new thoughts on this, as we're still running the original 1960 rims on the F? > Th anks for your input, and apologies for again bringing up an old topic ! > Noel Hastalis > Burr Ridge, IL > And there's also the continuing debate re installing new rims. Diamond Back's website quotes the 12/6/07 Old Cars Weekly article that we saw on our Club website a few months back, and says the claim is bogus, that there's no alloy difference, and no markings on rims to indicate use with bias or radial tires. DB's argument in fact states that radials absorb more impact and are therefore less stressful on rims than are bias ply tires. Any new thoughts on this, as we're still running the original 1960 rims on the F? > Th anks for your input, and apologies for again bringing up an old topic ! > Noel Hastalis > Burr Ridge, IL > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ------------------------------------ To send a message to this group, send an email to: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ To send a message to this group, send an email to: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/Yahoo! Groups Links ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ To send a message to this group, send an email to: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:Chrysler300-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:Chrysler300-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/