RE: [Chrysler300] while you were watching the G, there was an F
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Chrysler300] while you were watching the G, there was an F



I doubt there are any McCulloch (later Paxton) blown birds left in original 
condition. The 312 Y-block couldn't handle the power produced by the 
supercharger. The Main bearings were very narrow in a Y-block and the extra 
pressure from supercharging would literally squeeze the mains right out of 
the caps and the engines would self destruct.

We had a group in central Ohio that drag raced a blown Bird back in the 
60's, Dagwoods Restaurant. The car was competetive in NHRA Stock Eliminator 
but suffered from engine breakage. They tried everything but couldn't solve 
the bearing problem.  But it really screamed until it blew up.


>From: "christopher beilby" <thelastbestgenius@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [Chrysler300] while you were watching the G, there was an F
>Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:34:44 +1000
>
>For those that may care, a question.
>
>In 1957 what was the only US car that could run with a 300 - most likely
>answer was the F Code Thunderbird. F Code was Ford designation for 
>McCulloch
>VR Supercharged 312motors. Actual hp seems to have been about 350bhp, on
>dyno figures of rebuilt stock motors today. Near likely 300 car's hp
>figures, from say 57 to 62?
>
>With 300G conv figures just given re ebay one, of about 130 surviving, 
>total
>production of F Code Thunderbirds was only about this figure. The number
>surviving today I do not know - even if 50%, this means maybe only less 
>than
>around 50.
>
>So an unrestored F Code that just finished on Ebay is a perhaps interesting
>comparison re where rare unrestored US performance icons' values are at?  
>It
>finished near $55K, but bid was not enough. So that a much plainer looking
>US performance milestone car finished mid $50Ks in unrestored condition
>seems to indicate that the 300G convertible price was in a similar vein.
>
>Obviously both cars are very different, but anyone owning and using either
>would not feel too shabby or disappointed.  What all this likely means that
>if you have not got your special plaything, looks like it could be
>expensive? So where does that leave the chances of picking up another
>enjoyable 'sin' - a good looking nice personality busty babe - seems to me
>they are often attracted to money too?! - does that just leave us with site
>member's thought 'that in heaven we can get what we want', be it a stick 4
>speed F?  Sounds maybe a bit too good to be true, think I'll hang round a
>while yet.
>aussie Christopher
>
>




To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network Archive Sitemap


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.