------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Rent DVDs Online - Over 14,500 titles.
No Late Fees & Free Shipping.
Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/YoVfrB/XP.FAA/uetFAA/8LmulB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are 7 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. Tool source suggestion
From: "Warren R Anderson" <wranderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
2. RE: 64K gas tank grommet---Thanks from Dwight McGuire
From: "McGuire, Dwight" <dmcguire@xxxxxxxxxx>
3. Re: Tool source suggestion
From: "Warren R Anderson" <wranderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
4. Re: 300L grille medallion
From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
5. Re: 1962 Chrysler Speedometer Cable Housing and Cable???
From: "Charlie Valentine" <cross.ram@xxxxxxxxxxx>
6. Re: RE: 64K gas tank grommet---Thanks from Dwight McGuire
From: "Kelly Pierce" <jkrestor300@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
7. Re: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
From: Gary W Nelson <Gary@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 13:04:05 -0700
From: "Warren R Anderson" <wranderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Tool source suggestion
I have always soldered my crimp connections (after crimping) when I
>intended that they would become a permanent installation on my boats and
>also my cars. So far I have been lucky enough to not have any failures
>from those connections I completed in that manner.
>
>Bill Huff
A crimped only connection on stranded wire will lose integrity when exposed
to moisture. New vehicles have soldered/crimped connections (heavy duty
trucks especially) or soldered and heavy duty sealed from the elements. We
see bad connections especially in RV's where Scotch Locks are used in great
numbers and moisture gets into the housing. I live and work on mostly dry SW
vehicles but have seen eastern electricals virtually destroyed because of
non sealing terminations. There are many products out there to deal with
corrosion and a lot are intended for marine use which I do not get into
much.
Purpose here, there is a tool source that we have used for terminal crimping
tools. The tool I use to crimp insulated terminals is made by S & G Tool.
WWW.toolaid.com
Their part number is 18900 and it does work quite well and is not expensive.
The tool crimps equally every time and does not kill the operator doing the
job. The kit, 18920, we do not have but is capable of dealing with the
multitude of special connectors that are on mobile equipment. We have other
stand alone crimpers but this one tool set should do all. The 18900 crimps
neatly and does not tear up the insulator tube. This is NOT the tool that
doesn't work and is in the plastic box terminal kits. The individual wire
strands inside the crimp are still vulnerable to corrosion attack but inside
a car or otherwise protected should be OK. High power (12 ga or heavier) or
exposed to moisture, a non insulated or insulated terminal crimped AND
soldered will provide a high degree of connection integrity. Heavy wall
shrink tubing is a nice finishing touch. I do not think it has been
mentioned, shrink tubing is available heavy wall and silicone lined that
will provide moisture sealing.
There are recently released service bulletins on this topic from Ford, GM,
Chrysler and others with these recommendations.
We get fliers from the Tool Warehouse. Tools at GREAT prices and they should
have S&G crimpers and we think might sell to other than professional
wrenches.
Just checked out a thread on another site from HD techs in New Jersey,
Seattle, Eastern Canada and Chicago concerning electrical connections and
REAL corrosion protection. Think I'll stay here where it's dry and I don't
have to oil everything down to keep the salt from destroying whatever is
metal.
Warren Anderson
Sedona,AZ
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 16:14:09 -0400
From: "McGuire, Dwight" <dmcguire@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: 64K gas tank grommet---Thanks from Dwight McGuire
Just want to thank everyone for the responses to my quest for this grommet.
I located one @ a dealership in Illinois...it`s on the way! The last
superceded parts # is 2880 481. It looks like the gromett used until `70
will work for this application. There is one available from Year One as
well #FD80481. What a great feeling to belong to a club that has so many
dedicated members as well as the bonus of having a car (Chrysler 300!)that
draws so much interest even from non partisan crowds!!
Thanks again to John Hertog &
everyone involved,
Dwight
-----Original Message-----
From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 3:49 PM
To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Chrysler300] Digest Number 613
To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list server instructions, go to
http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are 22 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. 300H Tail lights
From: "Mark Souders" <souders@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
2. Decals
From: rondochrysler@xxxxxxx
3. 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
4. Re: '62 300 race cars
From: cotejohnr@xxxxxxx
5. Re: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
From: News4ge@xxxxxxx
6. Re: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
From: "Charlie Valentine" <cross.ram@xxxxxxxxxxx>
7. Re: '62 help - Alternators
From: mr-320@xxxxxxxxx
8. Power Booster Valves
From: "jennifer allyn" <gearhead.girl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
9. RE: New Hemi C 300
From: "christopher beilby" <thelastbestgenius@xxxxxxxxxxx>
10. Re: 300L Lens Trim Ring
From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
11. Fw: 300L Lens Trim Ring
From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
12. Re: New Hemi C 300
From: "Owen & Jo Grigg" <ram300@xxxxxxxxxx>
13. 300L Lens Trim Ring
From: "Jim Pristelski" <ajp002@xxxxxxx>
14. 300G Project on ebay
From: "Henry Hopkins" <hhrp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
15. Re: '62 300 race cars
From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxxxxxxxxx>
16. Re: '62 help - Alternators
From: William Huff <whuff@xxxxxxxxxx>
17. Another scam!!!!
From: "Moana & Gerry Steinberg" <mopar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
18. Re: '62 300 race cars
From: lettercars@xxxxxxx
19. RE: Another scam!!!!
From: "JOHN MC ADAMS" <clafong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
20. RE: Yet Another scam!!!!
From: "JOHN MC ADAMS" <clafong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
21. RE: `64 ram K conv.gas tank filler neck grommet part no./source
From: "McGuire, Dwight" <dmcguire@xxxxxxxxxx>
22. 300L grille medallion
From: "north lake real estate" <nlre01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:52:44 -0000
From: "Mark Souders" <souders@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: 300H Tail lights
Hi, gang,
Okay I give up. How in the world do these tail lights get
installed? I'v tried about four different ways and none looks
right. Which parts go on from inside the trunk and which parts go on
from outside and in what order? Same thing goes for the back-up
lights. I need to solve this dilemna before I scratch the paint or
break my NOS light bezels. Can anyone offer some tips?
Thanks,
Mark Souders
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:34:01 EDT
From: rondochrysler@xxxxxxx
Subject: Decals
Hi to everyone. Can someone tell me where I might purchase the decals for my
300C air cleaners?
Thanks Ron
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:25:22 -0400
From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
Hi to all,
Trying to help Dwight locate the right grommet for his fuel tank filler
tube, 1964 Chrysler 300K. Can someone please look up a '64 parts book and
confirm that the right part number is 1730087 ? (section 14) That is what
I come up with using a 63 parts book, can't imagine it would be different,
but I would feel better if double-checked!
You can either "reply to all" or reply to Dwight at DMcGuire@xxxxxxxxxx
Thanks
John
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:45:36 EDT
From: cotejohnr@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: '62 300 race cars
Owen,
The red 300H stock cars of the Bakers were probably backed or owned by
Leonard Berger of North Carolina. I met him last month at AACA Meet in
Greenville, S.C. where I showed my 300B. He told me Buck raced for (with?)
him on Nascar circuit with the "H" 's and that Chrysler had given him a red
300H for his personal use. He wishes he had it now.
He does not have the original red H that they gave him but now has a Tan
(rare) 300H that he uses and drives to meets. It is an AACA Senior from
several years ago but still very presentable.
He is a member of our Club. Of interest is that he also managed most of the
real estate for the Petty's in N.C.
I helped him with his bags into the hotel for the Greenville AACA Meet. His
room number was....................you guessed it.............Room #300 !!!!
John R. Cote
CT.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:47:46 EDT
From: News4ge@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
looks like it's a 2203 472.
George Clineman
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:09:35 -0700
From: "Charlie Valentine" <cross.ram@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
If the number is 1730087 Brads NOS parts has 3 of them.
If the number is 2203 472 Brads NOS parts has 8 of them.
I am not endorsing Brads NOS in any way. I just used Partsvoice and there
were several others who had some of one or the other but Brads seems to have
both of them.
I hope that I have been some help.
Charlie Valentine
----- Original Message -----
From: <News4ge@xxxxxxx>
To: <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
> looks like it's a 2203 472.
>
> George Clineman
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to
http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:49:27 -0700 (MST)
From: mr-320@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: '62 help - Alternators
i want to head off the impression that crimping is always a cheap,
poor substitute for soldering which, if done wrong, can itself be a bad
connection. crimping, done with the proper components and correct
tooling is a perfectly acceptable and superior connection method; just
as soldering done wrong can be a lousy connection.
JEFF
tucson az.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:11:56 -0700
From: "jennifer allyn" <gearhead.girl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Power Booster Valves
Anyone know a source for manifold (or check) valves for 1962 type power
booster units?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 11:30:03 +1000
From: "christopher beilby" <thelastbestgenius@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: New Hemi C 300
It seems fairly obvious from email responses that there is fairly widespread
opposition to any attempt, or thoughts, that D-C should 're-use' 300
letters?
Rather than rely on 'someone close to D-C should, or already has' told them
(D-C) they should not do this, either the Club MUST IN WRITING ASK
THEM/SUGGEST, or only 'NOT ASAP" if someone very high up in D-C can give it
in writing they do not intend re-using former letters!??
Ed del Grande and Doug Jones, and others, raised valid points.
We cannot ask that any company not re-use any name, be it Thunderbird, or
Eldorado. We may cringe at what they chose to use it on, but that is their
right. This however is totally different to that.
Please understand what here currently is something entirely NEW, when they
then ALSO choose to name that new model Thunderbird, Eldorado, or 300 with a
letter or designation that belongs to a previously famed/ regarded model,
that the new one is so dis-similar to the original!!!
Surely none of you believe this new currently named '300C' that someone at
D-C is 'officially' supplying copy to world media titled "new 300C", is
anywhere near as outstandingly 'performance ahead or styling significant' as
the early 300s !!!?? ( Ferrari would not be so dumb to re-use one it's
milestone names/models on 'so ordinary' an effort for the time - why should
D-C, you, the USA ?? )
Tell them officially, "please no re-use", certainly on initially lesser
attempts to the original chosen letters?!
ps Liz, have already changed the oil, fixed 2 steering boxes - can you
suggest a good polish, the harsh aussie sun seemingly affects not only our
brains, but also the paint?
Aussie Christopher
>From: "Wieland, Elizabeth" <EWieland@xxxxxxxxxx>
>To: chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [Chrysler300] New Hemi C 300
>Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:41:46 -0400
>
>Seems to me you have all forgotten we have members who work at D-C and
>could
>solve the dilemma of the 300C or 300N if one would just ask them.
>
>My source who volunteered the information on his own and without my even
>asking reports the 300C that was in New York will be released as a 300N.
>
>Don't you all have better things to do than whine about the current models?
>Go change your oil, fix your steering box or polish your 300 for the next
>car show!
>
>Elizabeth Wieland
>
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to
http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:41:00 -0400
From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 300L Lens Trim Ring
For those seeking the trim ring, It is available through Emblemagic
www.emblemagic.com . In my case I waited 6 months to get it. They require a
deposit of $25 up front. I believe the total cost was $60. The quality
appears good, but since I have never seen an original one, I can't say how
exacting a reproduction it is.
Steve Galezowski
----- Original Message -----
From: "George and Rene VerBerkmoes" <zzub@xxxxxxx>
To: "Steve Galezowski" <steveg@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring
> Hi Steve,
>
> Where did you get a repo trim ring? I need one for my car. If you have a
> Point of Contact, price, lead time and telephone number it would make my
> day. Also, could you let me know what tips you get for attaching? Thanks
in
> advance.
>
> Regards,
> George V
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:44:34 -0400
From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Fw: 300L Lens Trim Ring
Sorry, it was $125. A ridiculous amount for a tiny piece of plastic. But
when you need a part........
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Fern Rivard" <crc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Steve Galezowski"
<steveg@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 9:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring
> For those seeking the trim ring, It is available through Emblemagic
> www.emblemagic.com . In my case I waited 6 months to get it. They require
a
> deposit of $25 up front. I believe the total cost was $60. The quality
> appears good, but since I have never seen an original one, I can't say how
> exacting a reproduction it is.
>
> Steve Galezowski
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Fern Rivard" <crc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Steve Galezowski" <steveg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 10:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring
>
>
> > HI Steve:
> > Where did you get these repro from and what do you think of the
> quality?
> > If it's from the source that I can't remember the name now, they always
> > quoted me 6 months or more to deliver but wanted payment up front! I
need
> > two of those trim rings as neither of my 300L's have it on. Fern in
> > Cranbrook SE BC
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 1:33 PM
> > Subject: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring
> >
> >
> > > I have a repro trim ring to be installed around the center running
light
> > on my L. I understand that these trim rings are prone to fall off. Can
> > anyone offer a recommendation as to the type of adhesive to use to
ensure
> > the ring is on the car for a long time?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Steve Galezowski
> > > 65 300L
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups
> > >
> > > To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> > > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > For list server instructions, go to
> > http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 12
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 14:38:35 +1200
From: "Owen & Jo Grigg" <ram300@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New Hemi C 300
C'mon guys it's 2003, times have changed, "D-C" are in the business of
selling cars to the mass market. They're not in the business of pleasing a
small group of people that think it's still 1957.
The "ugliness" of the current models makes our cars even more special in my
opinion.
Accept it and get on with life.
My 2c worth
Owen
----- Original Message -----
From: christopher beilby <thelastbestgenius@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <EWieland@xxxxxxxxxx>; <chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 1:30 PM
Subject: RE: [Chrysler300] New Hemi C 300
> It seems fairly obvious from email responses that there is fairly
widespread
> opposition to any attempt, or thoughts, that D-C should 're-use' 300
> letters?
>
> Rather than rely on 'someone close to D-C should, or already has' told
them
> (D-C) they should not do this, either the Club MUST IN WRITING ASK
> THEM/SUGGEST, or only 'NOT ASAP" if someone very high up in D-C can give
it
> in writing they do not intend re-using former letters!??
>
> Ed del Grande and Doug Jones, and others, raised valid points.
>
> We cannot ask that any company not re-use any name, be it Thunderbird, or
> Eldorado. We may cringe at what they chose to use it on, but that is
their
> right. This however is totally different to that.
>
> Please understand what here currently is something entirely NEW, when they
> then ALSO choose to name that new model Thunderbird, Eldorado, or 300 with
a
> letter or designation that belongs to a previously famed/ regarded model,
> that the new one is so dis-similar to the original!!!
>
> Surely none of you believe this new currently named '300C' that someone at
> D-C is 'officially' supplying copy to world media titled "new 300C", is
> anywhere near as outstandingly 'performance ahead or styling significant'
as
> the early 300s !!!?? ( Ferrari would not be so dumb to re-use one it's
> milestone names/models on 'so ordinary' an effort for the time - why
should
> D-C, you, the USA ?? )
>
> Tell them officially, "please no re-use", certainly on initially lesser
> attempts to the original chosen letters?!
>
>
> ps Liz, have already changed the oil, fixed 2 steering boxes - can you
> suggest a good polish, the harsh aussie sun seemingly affects not only our
> brains, but also the paint?
>
> Aussie Christopher
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Wieland, Elizabeth" <EWieland@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >To: chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: RE: [Chrysler300] New Hemi C 300
> >Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:41:46 -0400
> >
> >Seems to me you have all forgotten we have members who work at D-C and
> >could
> >solve the dilemma of the 300C or 300N if one would just ask them.
> >
> >My source who volunteered the information on his own and without my even
> >asking reports the 300C that was in New York will be released as a 300N.
> >
> >Don't you all have better things to do than whine about the current
models?
> >Go change your oil, fix your steering box or polish your 300 for the next
> >car show!
> >
> >Elizabeth Wieland
> >
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to
> http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp
>
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to
http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 13
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:09:30 -0500
From: "Jim Pristelski" <ajp002@xxxxxxx>
Subject: 300L Lens Trim Ring
If anyone needs the pot metal trim ring for the 1965 300L grille medallion,
I have a nice original one. No pitting, nice chrome, complete with original
mounting studs, P/N 2575091, for $125. Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Galezowski [mailto:stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 8:45 PM
To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Fw: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring
Sorry, it was $125. A ridiculous amount for a tiny piece of plastic. But
when you need a part........
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 14
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:14:59 -0700
From: "Henry Hopkins" <hhrp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: 300G Project on ebay
Located in San Diego. Check out photos. Present owner in the club? Looks
as if everything is there but still quite a project.
And what about the 58 D that has no bids as yet starting out at $15,100?
And the 55C300 ending up tomorrow afternoon.
Lots of 300's out there suddenly.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 15
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 22:59:03 -0500
From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: '62 300 race cars
Hi all;
Leonard joined the club some months before the Spencer, NC meet, hosted by
Rev. Carl Kreps. He was then retired from Petty Ent., and was instrimental
in getting the club access to the racing shops at Petty Ent. The members
toured where the public is not allowed, and some of us were lead by Lee
Petty, himself.
He also got us into Charlotte (Lowe's) Speedway where we had lunch in the
private Clubhouse overlooking the track. We were also allowed to park our
cars on the sidewalk in front of the Main entrance and had pictures taken
there. In add'n, he had Tim Flock there at lunch as a special guest. Tim
signed copies of the famous drawing of the 300's side by side on the Daytona
bank, some had their dashes/gloveboxes signed.
He arranged other things for us, which enhanced Carl's meet, and made it
truly special. Lee Petty and Tim flock are gone now and most of us would
have never met them had it not been for Leonard, and we all thank him again.
These things are the fabric of our meets, most of them special in their own
way, and the members who skip them are missing many great experiences. If
you haven't made a meet, just do it. I promise you, you'll want to come
again!
Get those registration forms in, please, and we'll see/meet ya there!
Ray Jones, Meet Coordinator
> From: cotejohnr@xxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:45:36 EDT
> To: ram300@xxxxxxxxxx, Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] '62 300 race cars
>
> Owen,
> The red 300H stock cars of the Bakers were probably backed or owned by
> Leonard Berger of North Carolina. I met him last month at AACA Meet in
> Greenville, S.C. where I showed my 300B. He told me Buck raced for
(with?)
> him on Nascar circuit with the "H" 's and that Chrysler had given him a
red
> 300H for his personal use. He wishes he had it now.
> He does not have the original red H that they gave him but now has a Tan
> (rare) 300H that he uses and drives to meets. It is an AACA Senior from
> several years ago but still very presentable.
> He is a member of our Club. Of interest is that he also managed most of
the
> real estate for the Petty's in N.C.
> I helped him with his bags into the hotel for the Greenville AACA Meet.
His
> room number was....................you guessed it.............Room #300
!!!!
>
> John R. Cote
> CT.
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to
> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 16
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 01:15:54 -0400
From: William Huff <whuff@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: '62 help - Alternators
Well said Jeff. However, I would wager that the average home mechanic does
not have the proper terminals, nor the proper crimping/staking tools to
make connections that will reliably handle the 50+ amps that an alternator
charging circuit can carry. The wire size should probably be #10 or
#8. Those light duty terminals that one sees in the plastic box kits don't
cut it in my opinion. The crimping tools that come with those kits also
leave much to be desired. If you spend the money for good components,
and use them correctly, then probably crimping alone is ok. What might
work ok for short cruises could leave you stranded on a long night trip
with headlights, a good stereo and maybe an A/C going if a bad connection
exists. Soldering requires a good mechanical connection prior to the
soldering taking place, clean connections and a proper technique. Over the
years, I have always soldered my crimp connections (after crimping) when I
intended that they would become a permanent installation on my boats and
also my cars. So far I have been lucky enough to not have any failures
from those connections I completed in that manner.
Bill Huff
At 4/30/03 -0700 03:49 PM, you wrote:
> i want to head off the impression that crimping is always a cheap,
>poor substitute for soldering which, if done wrong, can itself be a bad
>connection. crimping, done with the proper components and correct
>tooling is a perfectly acceptable and superior connection method; just
>as soldering done wrong can be a lousy connection.
>
> JEFF
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 17
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 23:17:52 -0700
From: "Moana & Gerry Steinberg" <mopar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Another scam!!!!
Hi all: Just received this, sounds like another one of those
African scams. Yeh, sure send him a copy of your Driver's
License. We may be dumb at times, but not stupid.
Beware.
Gerry Steinberg,
Arizona
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Damara" <damara1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <mopar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 7:17 PM
Subject: Hello
Greetings Friend,
First, let me introduce myself, then the essence of this contact.
I am Mr Peter Damara, Bank Manager of United Bank For Africa , Capetown
Branch. I have urgent and very confidential business proposition for you. On
June 6 1998, a gold marchant/contractor with the Randgold Exploration
Company, Mr. Jim Smith made a numbered time (Fixed) deposited for twelve
calendar months, valued at US$25,000,000.00 (Twenty-five Million Dollars) in
my branch.
Upon maturity, I sent a routine notification to his forwarding address but
got no reply. After a month, we sent a reminder and finally we discovered
from his contract employers, Randgold Exploration company Ltd that Mr. Jim
Smith died from an automobile accident. On further investigation, I found
out that he did not leave a WILL and all attempts to trace his next of kin
were fruitless.
I therefore made further investigation and discovered that Mr. Jim Smith did
not declare any next of kin in all his official documents, including his
Bank Deposit paperwork.
This sum of US$25,000,000.00 is still sitting in the Bank and the interest
is being rolled over with the principal sum at the end of each year. No one
will come forward to claim it. According to the South African Law, at the
expiration of 5 (five) years, the money will revert to the ownership of the
South African Government if nobody applies to claim the funds.
Consequently, my proposal is that I will like you as a foreigner to stand in
as the next of kin to Mr. Jim Smith so that the fruits of this old man's
labour will not get into the hands of some corrupt officials. This is
simple, I will like you to provide me immediately with your full names and
address so that the attorney will prepare the necessary documents and
affidavits,which will put you in place as the next of kin.
I would also like you to scan you drivers license for me.
We shall employ the services of two attorneys for drafting and notarization
of the WILL and obtain the necessary documents and letter of
probate/administration in your favour for the transfer.A bank account in any
part of the world, which you provide, will then facilitate the transfer of
this money to you as the beneficiary/next of kin. The money will be paid
into your account for us to share in the ratio of 60% for me and 40% for
you.
There is no risk at all as all the paperwork for this transaction will be
done by the attorney and my position as the Branch Manager guarantees the
successful execution of this transaction.
If you are interested, please reply immediately. Upon your response, I shall
then provide you with more details and relevant documents that will help you
understand.
Please observe utmost confidentiality, and rest assured that this
transaction would be most profitable for both of us because I shall require
your assistance to invest my share in your country.
Awaiting your urgent reply via email.
Thanks and regards,
Peter Damara
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 18
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 09:00:33 EDT
From: lettercars@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: '62 300 race cars
Ray, thanks for bringing up the Spencer meet. It certainly was outstanding.
I have all of Tim Flock's talk on tape. Who would have thought he would
have
been gone just a year or two later? Oh, yes, and then there was the chat
with King Richard himself, in the parking lot after the Petty Enterprises
tour. (A few of us were still hanging around--- having a little
refreshment!)
Regarding the Baker race cars. I would certainly doubt they were 300Hs.
Why
pay for all the extras not needed in a race car----especially that interior?
I don't know if any pictures exist of the cars from the rear, but I would be
very surprised to see any "Hs" on the deck lids! Maybe someone more
knowledgable in old NASCAR stuff could enlighten us on that. Other racing
1962s like Brock's, Granatelli's, and Faubel's were not lettercars. I did
buy one of the pictures on ebay referred to. A little fuzzy, as the seller
warned, but pretty cool to hang on the wall. 300ly, Gil
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 19
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 06:46:03 -0700
From: "JOHN MC ADAMS" <clafong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Another scam!!!!
To all club members:
I would like to add another potential scam.
I regularly transact business on E$$BAY and like to use P0
-----Original Message-----
From: Moana & Gerry Steinberg [mailto:mopar@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 11:18 PM
To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Chrysler300] Another scam!!!!
Hi all: Just received this, sounds like another one of those
African scams. Yeh, sure send him a copy of your Driver's
License. We may be dumb at times, but not stupid.
Beware.
Gerry Steinberg,
Arizona
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 20
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 07:35:17 -0700
From: "JOHN MC ADAMS" <clafong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Yet Another scam!!!!
To all club members:
I would like to add yet another potential scam.
(Sorry, I accidentally sent this out before I added the details.)
I regularly transact business on E$$BAY and USED to use Paypal (which by the
way is now owned by E-Bay). Well recently I received an E-Mail from
"someone" which had what looked like an official Paypal logo and a return
address of "paysecurity@xxxxxxxxxx" informing me that "Paypal" was
conducting a periodic update of members to check their records on inactive
accounts and non functioning mailboxes. This E-Mail included a form which
asked for my e-mail address, password, name, billing address, credit card
number, expiration date, and pin number. I am surprised that they did not
also ask for my social security number and my mothers maiden name.
This form was a regular html document and did NOT indicate that it was using
any form of encryption technology.
I immediately sent off an E-Mail to Paypal informing them of this E-Mail and
giving them the senders E-Mail address. In searching for scams on the
internet, it seems that there have been numerous occurrences of this type of
thing recently, with PayPal and other organizations.
Bottom line, if anyone asks for any type of personal information ---DO NOT
send them anything. Immediately contact the real organization, using the
normal internet address that you use to enter their site and notify them
that you just received such a request. You might also send an E-Mail to the
FBI Internet Fraud Division at http://www1.ifccfbi.gov/index.asp. Check
this site out yourself - It looks to be an authentic government site and not
yet another scam organization.
The bottom line is to always be cautious and suspicious of anyone EVER
asking for ANY information from you. Sorry if this sounds paranoid, but you
can never be too careful these days.
Now to make this post official for the listserver and related to our 300's.
I must mention that I love my 1962 Chrysler 300 "Sport" convertible and the
weather is getting very nice for taking it out for a drive.
Be Careful and happy cruising,
John Mc Adams
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 21
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 10:33:41 -0400
From: "McGuire, Dwight" <dmcguire@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: `64 ram K conv.gas tank filler neck grommet part no./source
Hello to All,
I still haven`t had any luck locating a filler neck grommet for the
K.....have part #1730087 from John & #2303472 from a local dealer
(Louisville,KY) but am being told by three different dealers they are not
available through Chrysler. I checked with Year One on a lead but no luck
either. Can anyone comfirm this part no. or provide any other sources? I`m
itching to take the new addition (my 1st letter car!) on it`s maiden voyage!
Thanks in advance,
Dwight
-----Original Message-----
From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 7:44 AM
To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Chrysler300] Digest Number 612
To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list server instructions, go to
http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are 9 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. Fuel Pump Application?
From: "Wayne Graefen" <wgraefen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
2. Re: New Hemi C 300
From: "Thomas Miller" <tfm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
3. RE: New Hemi C 300
From: "Wieland, Elizabeth" <EWieland@xxxxxxxxxx>
4. 300c / "concept" car
From: oldeiron@xxxxxxxxx
5. Re: rear end housing swap
From: GERALD OLSON <olson77@xxxxxxxxxxx>
6. Carb Question
From: pennsy300@xxxxxxx
7. Fw: 300-C parts
From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
8. 300L Lens Trim Ring
From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
9. Chrysler 300 Spring Meet
From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxxxxxxxxx>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 07:13:30 -0500
From: "Wayne Graefen" <wgraefen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Fuel Pump Application?
The M2501S Carter fuel pump is the "early" pump for '57 Plymouth, Dodge and
DeSoto V8s only, like my '57 DeSoto Firedome.
Wayne
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:30:32 -0400
From: "Park Waldrop" <pwald@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Fuel Pump Application?
Anyone have a Carter fuel pump application list? I have an M2501S pump that
appears to be a good rebuildable unit, but don't know what it goes on (came
in box of spares for my C cpe).
Park Waldrop
Atlanta
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:24:05 -0400
From: "Thomas Miller" <tfm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New Hemi C 300
Okay gang, figure it out. The "C" stands for CONCEPT.
As far as history goes, I see plenty of it at:
http://www.chrysler.com/design/vehicle_design/history/eras/ .
Oh, and what about clubs? Try
http://www.chrysler.com/design/vehicle_design/car_clubs/
where you'll see the 300 Club Intl. mentioned by name.
And, as far as the dealers go, well lots of them are just that.
Dealers. Over the years, I found that some are into cars, and some
might just as well be selling tractors. I remember very proudly
displaying my 300C on the showroom floor of a local Chrysler dealership
soon after I purchased it. The General Manager of the dealership is a
good friend of mine and knows the heritage of the lettercars. His Sales
Manager at the time thought my car was really neat, was glad to have it
on the floor next to a '99, but didn't understand the whole letter thing
and referred to it as a '57 300M. <grin>
Best Regards,
Thomas F. Miller
tfm@xxxxxxxxxxxx
pageTFM@xxxxxxxxxxxx / text paging
614.975.4164 / voice
707.667.2601 / eFax
300C, 300M
>>> <fastedgie@xxxxxxx> 4/29/2003 12:14:47 AM >>>
Why is the new Chrysler a 300 Hemi C?????
What has the C got to do with the current name.
The letter 'C' in 1957 had a special designation earned as a
performance vehicle in a series of Letter cars. These special letter
cars became sought after collectibles because of their special impact on
the history automobile and in particular to the making of a great
company, Chrysler Corporation.
But what the hell has the C got to do with the 2005 model year?
Especially when the 'C' follows the 'M' car a mass produced non
collector car??
It's obvious the current marketers at DCX are right out of touch with
reality. They want to capitalize on the marketing value of the Letter
Cars, but they fail to see the need to protect the real letter cars from
the rank and file.
The current management should take a lesson from Chrysler management of
the 50's and early 60's. They too saw the value of capitalizing on the
Chrysler 300 name. But they protected the letter cars by dropping the
letters on the mass produced 300's of that time period. Even Iacocca
saw they importance of the special status of the Letter cars by
designating the 79 Chrysler 300 as a letterless car., not withstanding
what he did to the Charger name. ( Charger 2.2, what a laugh on Dodge's
history)
The current 300 M should never have been a letter car, it's way too
late to fix it. But to go from the 'M' to a 'C' is absolutely senseless
and without any marketing advantage. And in common English, it's
confusing and alphebetically incorrect.
In the future when a 300 Club Member is called upon to explain the
special significance of the Letter Cars, he will indeed, have to explain
the meaning of stupidity. The unfortunate thing is there is no law
against it.
Ed Del Grande
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list server instructions, go to
http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
----------
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
X-GWTYPE:USER
FN:"tfm@xxxxxxxxxxxx".GWIA.Zippynet
EMAIL;WORK;PREF:tfm@xxxxxxxxxxxx
N:"tfm@xxxxxxxxxxxx".GWIA.Zippynet
END:VCARD
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
X-GWTYPE:USER
FN:Thomas Miller
TEL;WORK:614.975.4164
TEL;PREF;FAX:614.263.9913
EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:TFM@xxxxxxxxxxxx
N:Miller;Thomas
TITLE:Head Loser
END:VCARD
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:41:46 -0400
From: "Wieland, Elizabeth" <EWieland@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: New Hemi C 300
Seems to me you have all forgotten we have members who work at D-C and could
solve the dilemma of the 300C or 300N if one would just ask them.
My source who volunteered the information on his own and without my even
asking reports the 300C that was in New York will be released as a 300N.
Don't you all have better things to do than whine about the current models?
Go change your oil, fix your steering box or polish your 300 for the next
car show!
Elizabeth Wieland
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:47:23 -0500 (EST)
From: oldeiron@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: 300c / "concept" car
re:Elizabeth Wieland mssg --ditto !
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 13:23:53 -0400
From: GERALD OLSON <olson77@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: rear end housing swap
John, I have a 1970 323 surgrip in my 61 wagon. Had to move the spring
perches 3/8 in. outboard. Howard Stoll did it for me years ago. Hope
lhis helps---Jerry
----- Original Message -----
From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, April 28, 2003 11:37 pm
Subject: [Chrysler300] rear end housing swap
> Thank you all who responded to the bearing question re: rear ends.
> Very
> informative replies. I can't find the time to answer each one
> individually.So - thank you all !
>
> Another question, please, to this group: could somebody tell me
> specificallywhat rear end assembly, complete, from a later Mopar
> without the tapered
> axles will fit under, say, a 60 thru 64 Chrysler 300? The few
> that I have
> measured have had different spacings between the rear spring
> perches. I do
> know that this swap is do-able, I have seen it done, and, indeed,
> my 300G
> convert. has such a rear end under it now, but I didn't do it !
>
> No, I am not thinking of doing this modification to a Letter car.
> But I
> would like to do it to my '62 NYker wagon, and would like to
> locate and buy,
> in a junkyard, a complete suitable rear end asembly. Just not
> sure what
> matches up...
>
> Sincerely
> John
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------
> -~-->
> Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important
> Questions.http://us.click.yahoo.com/O10svD/Me7FAA/AG3JAA/8LmulB/TM
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> --~->
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to
> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:12:41 EDT
From: pennsy300@xxxxxxx
Subject: Carb Question
I know there was a factory service bulletin concerning hesitation and
surging
on acceleration for the 300 D. Does this bulletin call for the modification
of both carburators, or only the rear, primary carb? And does anybody know
of a vendor or source for someone who can perform the required mods?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:31:43 -0400
From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Fw: 300-C parts
Hi to all,
Here you go - 300C parts for sale. Please contact seller directly if any
interest, I just rec'd his e-mail, that's all I know...
John
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Ahern" <doug.ahern@xxxxxxx>
To: <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 3:31 PM
Subject: 300-C parts
>
> I have some NOS 300-C parts for sale, do you know anyone restoring
> a 300-C? I have emblems (side 1/4 panel emblem, grille emblem), a
> grille, fenders and a few other items.
>
> the 300's on your site are very nice. good site!
>
> Thanks!
> Doug Ahern
> Athens, GA
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:33:31 -0400
From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: 300L Lens Trim Ring
I have a repro trim ring to be installed around the center running light on
my L. I understand that these trim rings are prone to fall off. Can anyone
offer a recommendation as to the type of adhesive to use to ensure the ring
is on the car for a long time?
Thanks,
Steve Galezowski
65 300L
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 18:03:13 -0500
From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Chrysler 300 Spring Meet
ATTENTION: To all those planning to attend the meet and haven't yet
registered or reserved a hotel room.
We have received only 17 mail in registrations so far!
The Battle Creek Inn, as of today, has received 31 reservations.
Reservation deadline is May 21 at hotel. That leaves you 3 weeks!
Come on folks, help us out here. We need to get these in as early as
possable to ease the load on the office staff.
The meet is in 41 days! We expect everyone there!!! It's goona be a good'n.
The upcoming NewsFlite will have another registration form included in it.
That issue should be out to all members by end of this week or first of next
week.
Ray Jones, Meet Coordinator
Y'all come now, y'hear?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 22
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 09:45:43 -0700
From: "north lake real estate" <nlre01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: 300L grille medallion
I need the plastic lens cover for this running light. Can anyone help me out
with this. Emblemagic did not seem to have these. I've got the metal piece
but someone chose to break the lens cover. I do have all the pieces, maybe
there is some way to "glue?" it back together?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 15:28:59 -0700
From: "Warren R Anderson" <wranderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Tool source suggestion
>
>Their part number is 18900 and it does work quite well and is not
expensive.
>The tool crimps equally every time and does not kill the operator doing the
>job.
//thetoolwarehouse.net/
My son found 18900 on the web site above for $20.02 'on sale', just to
finish my post. HTH This tool does provide consistantly good insulated
terminal crimps that do not pull off.
Warren Anderson
Sedona,AZ
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 20:39:28 -0400
From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 300L grille medallion
A reproduction lens is available through the Club. They may still have some
in stock. If not, I understand a second production run is planned.
----- Original Message -----
From: "north lake real estate" <nlre01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 12:45 PM
Subject: [Chrysler300] 300L grille medallion
> I need the plastic lens cover for this running light. Can anyone help me
out with this. Emblemagic did not seem to have these. I've got the metal
piece but someone chose to break the lens cover. I do have all the pieces,
maybe there is some way to "glue?" it back together?
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to
http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 20:37:12 -0700
From: "Charlie Valentine" <cross.ram@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 1962 Chrysler Speedometer Cable Housing and Cable???
Would anyone have a spare speedometer cable HOUSING and CABLE that they are
willing to part with? I need it for my 62 300.
Mine just got fried. In the original one I took out the cable to lubricate
it. As I was putting the cable back in the housing it stopped at about the
half way point. Further investigation showed a kink. No problem. I had a
real nice spare. I put the spare through the firewall and down to the trans.
Everything seemed okay. I was inside the car (hood was down) and I was
sending the cable into the housing. This cable started to jam. How could it,
everything was like new? I got up to see what was wrong and I saw smoke
coming out from under the hood. Luckily I have these "cam action quick
release" battery terminals.
As I was sending the cable through the housing it was moving the housing
right against the started terminal. It kind of welded through the housing
and welded the real nice cable to the real nice housing. The cable housing
is burned through so bad that it is almost in two pieces.
Now I do not know how fast or slow I am going. Anybody got a spare.
Charlie Valentine
300G, 62 300 Sport Convertible
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 21:45:24 -0600
From: "Kelly Pierce" <jkrestor300@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RE: 64K gas tank grommet---Thanks from Dwight McGuire
Greetings Group_
I have found this discussion interesting - especially about the part
number for a 63 fuel tank grommet. I just pulled a tank out of the 63 New
Yorker I got for parts and the filler neck is soldered in like the 62 I
r&r'ed a few years back. No brace to the body like the 64's have, and
appears that it never did. Was 63 a transition year or did I get a oddball
in the parts car???
And by the way- Still have many good J parts>>>> and all the 57 goodies.
Joe Pierce 300J+Kx3+others....
----- Original Message -----
From: "McGuire, Dwight" <dmcguire@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 2:14 PM
Subject: [Chrysler300] RE: 64K gas tank grommet---Thanks from Dwight McGuire
> Just want to thank everyone for the responses to my quest for this
grommet.
> I located one @ a dealership in Illinois...it`s on the way! The last
> superceded parts # is 2880 481. It looks like the gromett used until `70
> will work for this application. There is one available from Year One as
> well #FD80481. What a great feeling to belong to a club that has so many
> dedicated members as well as the bonus of having a car (Chrysler 300!)that
> draws so much interest even from non partisan crowds!!
> Thanks again to John Hertog &
> everyone involved,
>
> Dwight
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 3:49 PM
> To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Chrysler300] Digest Number 613
>
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to
> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> There are 22 messages in this issue.
>
> Topics in this digest:
>
> 1. 300H Tail lights
> From: "Mark Souders" <souders@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 2. Decals
> From: rondochrysler@xxxxxxx
> 3. 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
> From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 4. Re: '62 300 race cars
> From: cotejohnr@xxxxxxx
> 5. Re: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
> From: News4ge@xxxxxxx
> 6. Re: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
> From: "Charlie Valentine" <cross.ram@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 7. Re: '62 help - Alternators
> From: mr-320@xxxxxxxxx
> 8. Power Booster Valves
> From: "jennifer allyn" <gearhead.girl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 9. RE: New Hemi C 300
> From: "christopher beilby" <thelastbestgenius@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 10. Re: 300L Lens Trim Ring
> From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 11. Fw: 300L Lens Trim Ring
> From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 12. Re: New Hemi C 300
> From: "Owen & Jo Grigg" <ram300@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 13. 300L Lens Trim Ring
> From: "Jim Pristelski" <ajp002@xxxxxxx>
> 14. 300G Project on ebay
> From: "Henry Hopkins" <hhrp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 15. Re: '62 300 race cars
> From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 16. Re: '62 help - Alternators
> From: William Huff <whuff@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 17. Another scam!!!!
> From: "Moana & Gerry Steinberg" <mopar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 18. Re: '62 300 race cars
> From: lettercars@xxxxxxx
> 19. RE: Another scam!!!!
> From: "JOHN MC ADAMS" <clafong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 20. RE: Yet Another scam!!!!
> From: "JOHN MC ADAMS" <clafong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 21. RE: `64 ram K conv.gas tank filler neck grommet part no./source
> From: "McGuire, Dwight" <dmcguire@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 22. 300L grille medallion
> From: "north lake real estate" <nlre01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:52:44 -0000
> From: "Mark Souders" <souders@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: 300H Tail lights
>
> Hi, gang,
> Okay I give up. How in the world do these tail lights get
> installed? I'v tried about four different ways and none looks
> right. Which parts go on from inside the trunk and which parts go on
> from outside and in what order? Same thing goes for the back-up
> lights. I need to solve this dilemna before I scratch the paint or
> break my NOS light bezels. Can anyone offer some tips?
>
> Thanks,
> Mark Souders
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:34:01 EDT
> From: rondochrysler@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Decals
>
> Hi to everyone. Can someone tell me where I might purchase the decals for
my
>
> 300C air cleaners?
> Thanks Ron
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:25:22 -0400
> From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
>
> Hi to all,
>
> Trying to help Dwight locate the right grommet for his fuel tank filler
> tube, 1964 Chrysler 300K. Can someone please look up a '64 parts book
and
> confirm that the right part number is 1730087 ? (section 14) That is
what
> I come up with using a 63 parts book, can't imagine it would be different,
> but I would feel better if double-checked!
>
> You can either "reply to all" or reply to Dwight at DMcGuire@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> Thanks
> John
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:45:36 EDT
> From: cotejohnr@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: '62 300 race cars
>
> Owen,
> The red 300H stock cars of the Bakers were probably backed or owned by
> Leonard Berger of North Carolina. I met him last month at AACA Meet in
> Greenville, S.C. where I showed my 300B. He told me Buck raced for
(with?)
>
> him on Nascar circuit with the "H" 's and that Chrysler had given him a
red
>
> 300H for his personal use. He wishes he had it now.
> He does not have the original red H that they gave him but now has a Tan
> (rare) 300H that he uses and drives to meets. It is an AACA Senior from
> several years ago but still very presentable.
> He is a member of our Club. Of interest is that he also managed most of
the
>
> real estate for the Petty's in N.C.
> I helped him with his bags into the hotel for the Greenville AACA Meet.
His
>
> room number was....................you guessed it.............Room #300
!!!!
>
> John R. Cote
> CT.
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:47:46 EDT
> From: News4ge@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
>
> looks like it's a 2203 472.
>
> George Clineman
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:09:35 -0700
> From: "Charlie Valentine" <cross.ram@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
>
> If the number is 1730087 Brads NOS parts has 3 of them.
>
> If the number is 2203 472 Brads NOS parts has 8 of them.
>
> I am not endorsing Brads NOS in any way. I just used Partsvoice and there
> were several others who had some of one or the other but Brads seems to
have
> both of them.
> I hope that I have been some help.
>
> Charlie Valentine
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <News4ge@xxxxxxx>
> To: <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 2:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler
neck
>
>
> > looks like it's a 2203 472.
> >
> > George Clineman
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > For list server instructions, go to
> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:49:27 -0700 (MST)
> From: mr-320@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: '62 help - Alternators
>
> i want to head off the impression that crimping is always a cheap,
> poor substitute for soldering which, if done wrong, can itself be a bad
> connection. crimping, done with the proper components and correct
> tooling is a perfectly acceptable and superior connection method; just
> as soldering done wrong can be a lousy connection.
>
> JEFF
> tucson az.
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:11:56 -0700
> From: "jennifer allyn" <gearhead.girl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Power Booster Valves
>
> Anyone know a source for manifold (or check) valves for 1962 type power
> booster units?
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 11:30:03 +1000
> From: "christopher beilby" <thelastbestgenius@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: New Hemi C 300
>
> It seems fairly obvious from email responses that there is fairly
widespread
>
> opposition to any attempt, or thoughts, that D-C should 're-use' 300
> letters?
>
> Rather than rely on 'someone close to D-C should, or already has' told
them
> (D-C) they should not do this, either the Club MUST IN WRITING ASK
> THEM/SUGGEST, or only 'NOT ASAP" if someone very high up in D-C can give
it
> in writing they do not intend re-using former letters!??
>
> Ed del Grande and Doug Jones, and others, raised valid points.
>
> We cannot ask that any company not re-use any name, be it Thunderbird, or
> Eldorado. We may cringe at what they chose to use it on, but that is
their
> right. This however is totally different to that.
>
> Please understand what here currently is something entirely NEW, when they
> then ALSO choose to name that new model Thunderbird, Eldorado, or 300 with
a
>
> letter or designation that belongs to a previously famed/ regarded model,
> that the new one is so dis-similar to the original!!!
>
> Surely none of you believe this new currently named '300C' that someone at
> D-C is 'officially' supplying copy to world media titled "new 300C", is
> anywhere near as outstandingly 'performance ahead or styling significant'
as
>
> the early 300s !!!?? ( Ferrari would not be so dumb to re-use one it's
> milestone names/models on 'so ordinary' an effort for the time - why
should
> D-C, you, the USA ?? )
>
> Tell them officially, "please no re-use", certainly on initially lesser
> attempts to the original chosen letters?!
>
>
> ps Liz, have already changed the oil, fixed 2 steering boxes - can you
> suggest a good polish, the harsh aussie sun seemingly affects not only our
> brains, but also the paint?
>
> Aussie Christopher
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Wieland, Elizabeth" <EWieland@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >To: chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: RE: [Chrysler300] New Hemi C 300
> >Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:41:46 -0400
> >
> >Seems to me you have all forgotten we have members who work at D-C and
> >could
> >solve the dilemma of the 300C or 300N if one would just ask them.
> >
> >My source who volunteered the information on his own and without my even
> >asking reports the 300C that was in New York will be released as a 300N.
> >
> >Don't you all have better things to do than whine about the current
models?
> >Go change your oil, fix your steering box or polish your 300 for the next
> >car show!
> >
> >Elizabeth Wieland
> >
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to
> http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:41:00 -0400
> From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: 300L Lens Trim Ring
>
> For those seeking the trim ring, It is available through Emblemagic
> www.emblemagic.com . In my case I waited 6 months to get it. They require
a
> deposit of $25 up front. I believe the total cost was $60. The quality
> appears good, but since I have never seen an original one, I can't say how
> exacting a reproduction it is.
>
> Steve Galezowski
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "George and Rene VerBerkmoes" <zzub@xxxxxxx>
> To: "Steve Galezowski" <steveg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 6:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring
>
>
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > Where did you get a repo trim ring? I need one for my car. If you have a
> > Point of Contact, price, lead time and telephone number it would make my
> > day. Also, could you let me know what tips you get for attaching? Thanks
> in
> > advance.
> >
> > Regards,
> > George V
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:44:34 -0400
> From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Fw: 300L Lens Trim Ring
>
> Sorry, it was $125. A ridiculous amount for a tiny piece of plastic. But
> when you need a part........
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Fern Rivard" <crc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Steve Galezowski"
> <steveg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 9:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring
>
>
> > For those seeking the trim ring, It is available through Emblemagic
> > www.emblemagic.com . In my case I waited 6 months to get it. They
require
> a
> > deposit of $25 up front. I believe the total cost was $60. The quality
> > appears good, but since I have never seen an original one, I can't say
how
> > exacting a reproduction it is.
> >
> > Steve Galezowski
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Fern Rivard" <crc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "Steve Galezowski" <steveg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 10:59 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring
> >
> >
> > > HI Steve:
> > > Where did you get these repro from and what do you think of the
> > quality?
> > > If it's from the source that I can't remember the name now, they
always
> > > quoted me 6 months or more to deliver but wanted payment up front! I
> need
> > > two of those trim rings as neither of my 300L's have it on. Fern in
> > > Cranbrook SE BC
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 1:33 PM
> > > Subject: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring
> > >
> > >
> > > > I have a repro trim ring to be installed around the center running
> light
> > > on my L. I understand that these trim rings are prone to fall off. Can
> > > anyone offer a recommendation as to the type of adhesive to use to
> ensure
> > > the ring is on the car for a long time?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Steve Galezowski
> > > > 65 300L
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups
> > > >
> > > > To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> > > > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > > For list server instructions, go to
> > > http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 14:38:35 +1200
> From: "Owen & Jo Grigg" <ram300@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: New Hemi C 300
>
> C'mon guys it's 2003, times have changed, "D-C" are in the business of
> selling cars to the mass market. They're not in the business of pleasing a
> small group of people that think it's still 1957.
> The "ugliness" of the current models makes our cars even more special in
my
> opinion.
> Accept it and get on with life.
> My 2c worth
> Owen
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: christopher beilby <thelastbestgenius@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <EWieland@xxxxxxxxxx>; <chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 1:30 PM
> Subject: RE: [Chrysler300] New Hemi C 300
>
>
> > It seems fairly obvious from email responses that there is fairly
> widespread
> > opposition to any attempt, or thoughts, that D-C should 're-use' 300
> > letters?
> >
> > Rather than rely on 'someone close to D-C should, or already has' told
> them
> > (D-C) they should not do this, either the Club MUST IN WRITING ASK
> > THEM/SUGGEST, or only 'NOT ASAP" if someone very high up in D-C can give
> it
> > in writing they do not intend re-using former letters!??
> >
> > Ed del Grande and Doug Jones, and others, raised valid points.
> >
> > We cannot ask that any company not re-use any name, be it Thunderbird,
or
> > Eldorado. We may cringe at what they chose to use it on, but that is
> their
> > right. This however is totally different to that.
> >
> > Please understand what here currently is something entirely NEW, when
they
> > then ALSO choose to name that new model Thunderbird, Eldorado, or 300
with
> a
> > letter or designation that belongs to a previously famed/ regarded
model,
> > that the new one is so dis-similar to the original!!!
> >
> > Surely none of you believe this new currently named '300C' that someone
at
> > D-C is 'officially' supplying copy to world media titled "new 300C", is
> > anywhere near as outstandingly 'performance ahead or styling
significant'
> as
> > the early 300s !!!?? ( Ferrari would not be so dumb to re-use one it's
> > milestone names/models on 'so ordinary' an effort for the time - why
> should
> > D-C, you, the USA ?? )
> >
> > Tell them officially, "please no re-use", certainly on initially lesser
> > attempts to the original chosen letters?!
> >
> >
> > ps Liz, have already changed the oil, fixed 2 steering boxes - can you
> > suggest a good polish, the harsh aussie sun seemingly affects not only
our
> > brains, but also the paint?
> >
> > Aussie Christopher
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: "Wieland, Elizabeth" <EWieland@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >To: chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >Subject: RE: [Chrysler300] New Hemi C 300
> > >Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:41:46 -0400
> > >
> > >Seems to me you have all forgotten we have members who work at D-C and
> > >could
> > >solve the dilemma of the 300C or 300N if one would just ask them.
> > >
> > >My source who volunteered the information on his own and without my
even
> > >asking reports the 300C that was in New York will be released as a
300N.
> > >
> > >Don't you all have better things to do than whine about the current
> models?
> > >Go change your oil, fix your steering box or polish your 300 for the
next
> > >car show!
> > >
> > >Elizabeth Wieland
> > >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to
> > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp
> >
> >
> >
> > To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > For list server instructions, go to
> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:09:30 -0500
> From: "Jim Pristelski" <ajp002@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: 300L Lens Trim Ring
>
> If anyone needs the pot metal trim ring for the 1965 300L grille
medallion,
> I have a nice original one. No pitting, nice chrome, complete with
original
> mounting studs, P/N 2575091, for $125. Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Galezowski [mailto:stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 8:45 PM
> To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Fw: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring
>
>
> Sorry, it was $125. A ridiculous amount for a tiny piece of plastic. But
> when you need a part........
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:14:59 -0700
> From: "Henry Hopkins" <hhrp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: 300G Project on ebay
>
> Located in San Diego. Check out photos. Present owner in the club?
Looks
> as if everything is there but still quite a project.
>
> And what about the 58 D that has no bids as yet starting out at $15,100?
> And the 55C300 ending up tomorrow afternoon.
>
> Lots of 300's out there suddenly.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 22:59:03 -0500
> From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: '62 300 race cars
>
> Hi all;
> Leonard joined the club some months before the Spencer, NC meet, hosted by
> Rev. Carl Kreps. He was then retired from Petty Ent., and was instrimental
> in getting the club access to the racing shops at Petty Ent. The members
> toured where the public is not allowed, and some of us were lead by Lee
> Petty, himself.
> He also got us into Charlotte (Lowe's) Speedway where we had lunch in the
> private Clubhouse overlooking the track. We were also allowed to park our
> cars on the sidewalk in front of the Main entrance and had pictures taken
> there. In add'n, he had Tim Flock there at lunch as a special guest. Tim
> signed copies of the famous drawing of the 300's side by side on the
Daytona
> bank, some had their dashes/gloveboxes signed.
> He arranged other things for us, which enhanced Carl's meet, and made it
> truly special. Lee Petty and Tim flock are gone now and most of us would
> have never met them had it not been for Leonard, and we all thank him
again.
>
> These things are the fabric of our meets, most of them special in their
own
> way, and the members who skip them are missing many great experiences. If
> you haven't made a meet, just do it. I promise you, you'll want to come
> again!
>
> Get those registration forms in, please, and we'll see/meet ya there!
> Ray Jones, Meet Coordinator
>
> > From: cotejohnr@xxxxxxx
> > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:45:36 EDT
> > To: ram300@xxxxxxxxxx, Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] '62 300 race cars
> >
> > Owen,
> > The red 300H stock cars of the Bakers were probably backed or owned by
> > Leonard Berger of North Carolina. I met him last month at AACA Meet in
> > Greenville, S.C. where I showed my 300B. He told me Buck raced for
> (with?)
> > him on Nascar circuit with the "H" 's and that Chrysler had given him a
> red
> > 300H for his personal use. He wishes he had it now.
> > He does not have the original red H that they gave him but now has a Tan
> > (rare) 300H that he uses and drives to meets. It is an AACA Senior from
> > several years ago but still very presentable.
> > He is a member of our Club. Of interest is that he also managed most of
> the
> > real estate for the Petty's in N.C.
> > I helped him with his bags into the hotel for the Greenville AACA Meet.
> His
> > room number was....................you guessed it.............Room #300
> !!!!
> >
> > John R. Cote
> > CT.
> >
> >
> > To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > For list server instructions, go to
> > http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 01:15:54 -0400
> From: William Huff <whuff@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: '62 help - Alternators
>
> Well said Jeff. However, I would wager that the average home mechanic
does
> not have the proper terminals, nor the proper crimping/staking tools to
> make connections that will reliably handle the 50+ amps that an alternator
> charging circuit can carry. The wire size should probably be #10 or
> #8. Those light duty terminals that one sees in the plastic box kits
don't
> cut it in my opinion. The crimping tools that come with those kits also
> leave much to be desired. If you spend the money for good components,
> and use them correctly, then probably crimping alone is ok. What might
> work ok for short cruises could leave you stranded on a long night trip
> with headlights, a good stereo and maybe an A/C going if a bad connection
> exists. Soldering requires a good mechanical connection prior to the
> soldering taking place, clean connections and a proper technique. Over
the
> years, I have always soldered my crimp connections (after crimping) when I
> intended that they would become a permanent installation on my boats and
> also my cars. So far I have been lucky enough to not have any failures
> from those connections I completed in that manner.
>
> Bill Huff
>
>
> At 4/30/03 -0700 03:49 PM, you wrote:
> > i want to head off the impression that crimping is always a cheap,
> >poor substitute for soldering which, if done wrong, can itself be a bad
> >connection. crimping, done with the proper components and correct
> >tooling is a perfectly acceptable and superior connection method; just
> >as soldering done wrong can be a lousy connection.
> >
> > JEFF
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 23:17:52 -0700
> From: "Moana & Gerry Steinberg" <mopar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Another scam!!!!
>
> Hi all: Just received this, sounds like another one of those
> African scams. Yeh, sure send him a copy of your Driver's
> License. We may be dumb at times, but not stupid.
> Beware.
> Gerry Steinberg,
> Arizona
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Damara" <damara1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <mopar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 7:17 PM
> Subject: Hello
>
>
> Greetings Friend,
>
> First, let me introduce myself, then the essence of this contact.
>
> I am Mr Peter Damara, Bank Manager of United Bank For Africa , Capetown
> Branch. I have urgent and very confidential business proposition for you.
On
> June 6 1998, a gold marchant/contractor with the Randgold Exploration
> Company, Mr. Jim Smith made a numbered time (Fixed) deposited for twelve
> calendar months, valued at US$25,000,000.00 (Twenty-five Million Dollars)
in
> my branch.
>
> Upon maturity, I sent a routine notification to his forwarding address but
> got no reply. After a month, we sent a reminder and finally we discovered
> from his contract employers, Randgold Exploration company Ltd that Mr. Jim
> Smith died from an automobile accident. On further investigation, I found
> out that he did not leave a WILL and all attempts to trace his next of kin
> were fruitless.
> I therefore made further investigation and discovered that Mr. Jim Smith
did
> not declare any next of kin in all his official documents, including his
> Bank Deposit paperwork.
> This sum of US$25,000,000.00 is still sitting in the Bank and the interest
> is being rolled over with the principal sum at the end of each year. No
one
> will come forward to claim it. According to the South African Law, at the
> expiration of 5 (five) years, the money will revert to the ownership of
the
> South African Government if nobody applies to claim the funds.
> Consequently, my proposal is that I will like you as a foreigner to stand
in
> as the next of kin to Mr. Jim Smith so that the fruits of this old man's
> labour will not get into the hands of some corrupt officials. This is
> simple, I will like you to provide me immediately with your full names and
> address so that the attorney will prepare the necessary documents and
> affidavits,which will put you in place as the next of kin.
> I would also like you to scan you drivers license for me.
> We shall employ the services of two attorneys for drafting and
notarization
> of the WILL and obtain the necessary documents and letter of
> probate/administration in your favour for the transfer.A bank account in
any
> part of the world, which you provide, will then facilitate the transfer of
> this money to you as the beneficiary/next of kin. The money will be paid
> into your account for us to share in the ratio of 60% for me and 40% for
> you.
> There is no risk at all as all the paperwork for this transaction will be
> done by the attorney and my position as the Branch Manager guarantees the
> successful execution of this transaction.
>
> If you are interested, please reply immediately. Upon your response, I
shall
> then provide you with more details and relevant documents that will help
you
> understand.
> Please observe utmost confidentiality, and rest assured that this
> transaction would be most profitable for both of us because I shall
require
> your assistance to invest my share in your country.
>
> Awaiting your urgent reply via email.
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> Peter Damara
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 18
> Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 09:00:33 EDT
> From: lettercars@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: '62 300 race cars
>
> Ray, thanks for bringing up the Spencer meet. It certainly was
outstanding.
>
> I have all of Tim Flock's talk on tape. Who would have thought he would
> have
> been gone just a year or two later? Oh, yes, and then there was the chat
> with King Richard himself, in the parking lot after the Petty Enterprises
> tour. (A few of us were still hanging around--- having a little
> refreshment!)
> Regarding the Baker race cars. I would certainly doubt they were 300Hs.
> Why
> pay for all the extras not needed in a race car----especially that
interior?
>
> I don't know if any pictures exist of the cars from the rear, but I would
be
>
> very surprised to see any "Hs" on the deck lids! Maybe someone more
> knowledgable in old NASCAR stuff could enlighten us on that. Other racing
> 1962s like Brock's, Granatelli's, and Faubel's were not lettercars. I
did
> buy one of the pictures on ebay referred to. A little fuzzy, as the
seller
> warned, but pretty cool to hang on the wall. 300ly, Gil
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 19
> Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 06:46:03 -0700
> From: "JOHN MC ADAMS" <clafong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: Another scam!!!!
>
> To all club members:
>
>
>
> I would like to add another potential scam.
>
>
>
> I regularly transact business on E$$BAY and like to use P0
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Moana & Gerry Steinberg [mailto:mopar@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 11:18 PM
>
> To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Subject: [Chrysler300] Another scam!!!!
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all: Just received this, sounds like another one of those
>
> African scams. Yeh, sure send him a copy of your Driver's
>
> License. We may be dumb at times, but not stupid.
>
> Beware.
>
> Gerry Steinberg,
>
> Arizona
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 20
> Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 07:35:17 -0700
> From: "JOHN MC ADAMS" <clafong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: Yet Another scam!!!!
>
> To all club members:
>
>
>
> I would like to add yet another potential scam.
>
>
>
> (Sorry, I accidentally sent this out before I added the details.)
>
>
>
> I regularly transact business on E$$BAY and USED to use Paypal (which by
the
> way is now owned by E-Bay). Well recently I received an E-Mail from
> "someone" which had what looked like an official Paypal logo and a return
> address of "paysecurity@xxxxxxxxxx" informing me that "Paypal" was
> conducting a periodic update of members to check their records on inactive
> accounts and non functioning mailboxes. This E-Mail included a form which
> asked for my e-mail address, password, name, billing address, credit card
> number, expiration date, and pin number. I am surprised that they did not
> also ask for my social security number and my mothers maiden name.
>
>
>
> This form was a regular html document and did NOT indicate that it was
using
> any form of encryption technology.
>
>
>
> I immediately sent off an E-Mail to Paypal informing them of this E-Mail
and
> giving them the senders E-Mail address. In searching for scams on the
> internet, it seems that there have been numerous occurrences of this type
of
> thing recently, with PayPal and other organizations.
>
>
>
> Bottom line, if anyone asks for any type of personal information ---DO NOT
> send them anything. Immediately contact the real organization, using the
> normal internet address that you use to enter their site and notify them
> that you just received such a request. You might also send an E-Mail to
the
> FBI Internet Fraud Division at http://www1.ifccfbi.gov/index.asp. Check
> this site out yourself - It looks to be an authentic government site and
not
> yet another scam organization.
>
>
>
> The bottom line is to always be cautious and suspicious of anyone EVER
> asking for ANY information from you. Sorry if this sounds paranoid, but
you
> can never be too careful these days.
>
>
>
> Now to make this post official for the listserver and related to our
300's.
> I must mention that I love my 1962 Chrysler 300 "Sport" convertible and
the
> weather is getting very nice for taking it out for a drive.
>
>
>
> Be Careful and happy cruising,
>
>
>
> John Mc Adams
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 21
> Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 10:33:41 -0400
> From: "McGuire, Dwight" <dmcguire@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: `64 ram K conv.gas tank filler neck grommet part no./source
>
> Hello to All,
> I still haven`t had any luck locating a filler neck grommet for the
> K.....have part #1730087 from John & #2303472 from a local dealer
> (Louisville,KY) but am being told by three different dealers they are not
> available through Chrysler. I checked with Year One on a lead but no luck
> either. Can anyone comfirm this part no. or provide any other sources? I`m
> itching to take the new addition (my 1st letter car!) on it`s maiden
voyage!
> Thanks in advance,
> Dwight
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 7:44 AM
> To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Chrysler300] Digest Number 612
>
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to
> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> There are 9 messages in this issue.
>
> Topics in this digest:
>
> 1. Fuel Pump Application?
> From: "Wayne Graefen" <wgraefen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 2. Re: New Hemi C 300
> From: "Thomas Miller" <tfm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 3. RE: New Hemi C 300
> From: "Wieland, Elizabeth" <EWieland@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 4. 300c / "concept" car
> From: oldeiron@xxxxxxxxx
> 5. Re: rear end housing swap
> From: GERALD OLSON <olson77@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 6. Carb Question
> From: pennsy300@xxxxxxx
> 7. Fw: 300-C parts
> From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 8. 300L Lens Trim Ring
> From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 9. Chrysler 300 Spring Meet
> From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 07:13:30 -0500
> From: "Wayne Graefen" <wgraefen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Fuel Pump Application?
>
> The M2501S Carter fuel pump is the "early" pump for '57 Plymouth, Dodge
and
> DeSoto V8s only, like my '57 DeSoto Firedome.
>
> Wayne
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
>
>
> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:30:32 -0400
> From: "Park Waldrop" <pwald@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Fuel Pump Application?
>
> Anyone have a Carter fuel pump application list? I have an M2501S pump
that
> appears to be a good rebuildable unit, but don't know what it goes on
(came
> in box of spares for my C cpe).
>
> Park Waldrop
> Atlanta
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:24:05 -0400
> From: "Thomas Miller" <tfm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: New Hemi C 300
>
> Okay gang, figure it out. The "C" stands for CONCEPT.
>
> As far as history goes, I see plenty of it at:
>
> http://www.chrysler.com/design/vehicle_design/history/eras/ .
>
> Oh, and what about clubs? Try
>
> http://www.chrysler.com/design/vehicle_design/car_clubs/
>
> where you'll see the 300 Club Intl. mentioned by name.
>
> And, as far as the dealers go, well lots of them are just that.
> Dealers. Over the years, I found that some are into cars, and some
> might just as well be selling tractors. I remember very proudly
> displaying my 300C on the showroom floor of a local Chrysler dealership
> soon after I purchased it. The General Manager of the dealership is a
> good friend of mine and knows the heritage of the lettercars. His Sales
> Manager at the time thought my car was really neat, was glad to have it
> on the floor next to a '99, but didn't understand the whole letter thing
> and referred to it as a '57 300M. <grin>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Thomas F. Miller
>
> tfm@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> pageTFM@xxxxxxxxxxxx / text paging
> 614.975.4164 / voice
> 707.667.2601 / eFax
>
> 300C, 300M
>
> >>> <fastedgie@xxxxxxx> 4/29/2003 12:14:47 AM >>>
>
> Why is the new Chrysler a 300 Hemi C?????
> What has the C got to do with the current name.
> The letter 'C' in 1957 had a special designation earned as a
> performance vehicle in a series of Letter cars. These special letter
> cars became sought after collectibles because of their special impact on
> the history automobile and in particular to the making of a great
> company, Chrysler Corporation.
> But what the hell has the C got to do with the 2005 model year?
> Especially when the 'C' follows the 'M' car a mass produced non
> collector car??
> It's obvious the current marketers at DCX are right out of touch with
> reality. They want to capitalize on the marketing value of the Letter
> Cars, but they fail to see the need to protect the real letter cars from
> the rank and file.
> The current management should take a lesson from Chrysler management of
> the 50's and early 60's. They too saw the value of capitalizing on the
> Chrysler 300 name. But they protected the letter cars by dropping the
> letters on the mass produced 300's of that time period. Even Iacocca
> saw they importance of the special status of the Letter cars by
> designating the 79 Chrysler 300 as a letterless car., not withstanding
> what he did to the Charger name. ( Charger 2.2, what a laugh on Dodge's
> history)
> The current 300 M should never have been a letter car, it's way too
> late to fix it. But to go from the 'M' to a 'C' is absolutely senseless
> and without any marketing advantage. And in common English, it's
> confusing and alphebetically incorrect.
> In the future when a 300 Club Member is called upon to explain the
> special significance of the Letter Cars, he will indeed, have to explain
> the meaning of stupidity. The unfortunate thing is there is no law
> against it.
>
> Ed Del Grande
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to
> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> ----------
>
> BEGIN:VCARD
> VERSION:2.1
> X-GWTYPE:USER
> FN:"tfm@xxxxxxxxxxxx".GWIA.Zippynet
> EMAIL;WORK;PREF:tfm@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> N:"tfm@xxxxxxxxxxxx".GWIA.Zippynet
> END:VCARD
>
> BEGIN:VCARD
> VERSION:2.1
> X-GWTYPE:USER
> FN:Thomas Miller
> TEL;WORK:614.975.4164
> TEL;PREF;FAX:614.263.9913
> EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:TFM@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> N:Miller;Thomas
> TITLE:Head Loser
> END:VCARD
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:41:46 -0400
> From: "Wieland, Elizabeth" <EWieland@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: New Hemi C 300
>
> Seems to me you have all forgotten we have members who work at D-C and
could
> solve the dilemma of the 300C or 300N if one would just ask them.
>
> My source who volunteered the information on his own and without my even
> asking reports the 300C that was in New York will be released as a 300N.
>
> Don't you all have better things to do than whine about the current
models?
> Go change your oil, fix your steering box or polish your 300 for the next
> car show!
>
> Elizabeth Wieland
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:47:23 -0500 (EST)
> From: oldeiron@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: 300c / "concept" car
>
> re:Elizabeth Wieland mssg --ditto !
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 13:23:53 -0400
> From: GERALD OLSON <olson77@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: rear end housing swap
>
> John, I have a 1970 323 surgrip in my 61 wagon. Had to move the spring
> perches 3/8 in. outboard. Howard Stoll did it for me years ago. Hope
> lhis helps---Jerry
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Monday, April 28, 2003 11:37 pm
> Subject: [Chrysler300] rear end housing swap
>
> > Thank you all who responded to the bearing question re: rear ends.
> > Very
> > informative replies. I can't find the time to answer each one
> > individually.So - thank you all !
> >
> > Another question, please, to this group: could somebody tell me
> > specificallywhat rear end assembly, complete, from a later Mopar
> > without the tapered
> > axles will fit under, say, a 60 thru 64 Chrysler 300? The few
> > that I have
> > measured have had different spacings between the rear spring
> > perches. I do
> > know that this swap is do-able, I have seen it done, and, indeed,
> > my 300G
> > convert. has such a rear end under it now, but I didn't do it !
> >
> > No, I am not thinking of doing this modification to a Letter car.
> > But I
> > would like to do it to my '62 NYker wagon, and would like to
> > locate and buy,
> > in a junkyard, a complete suitable rear end asembly. Just not
> > sure what
> > matches up...
> >
> > Sincerely
> > John
> >
> >
> > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------
> > -~-->
> > Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important
> > Questions.http://us.click.yahoo.com/O10svD/Me7FAA/AG3JAA/8LmulB/TM
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --~->
> >
> > To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > For list server instructions, go to
> > http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:12:41 EDT
> From: pennsy300@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Carb Question
>
> I know there was a factory service bulletin concerning hesitation and
> surging
> on acceleration for the 300 D. Does this bulletin call for the
modification
>
> of both carburators, or only the rear, primary carb? And does anybody
know
> of a vendor or source for someone who can perform the required mods?
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:31:43 -0400
> From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Fw: 300-C parts
>
> Hi to all,
>
> Here you go - 300C parts for sale. Please contact seller directly if any
> interest, I just rec'd his e-mail, that's all I know...
>
> John
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Doug Ahern" <doug.ahern@xxxxxxx>
> To: <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 3:31 PM
> Subject: 300-C parts
>
>
> >
> > I have some NOS 300-C parts for sale, do you know anyone restoring
> > a 300-C? I have emblems (side 1/4 panel emblem, grille emblem), a
> > grille, fenders and a few other items.
> >
> > the 300's on your site are very nice. good site!
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Doug Ahern
> > Athens, GA
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:33:31 -0400
> From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: 300L Lens Trim Ring
>
> I have a repro trim ring to be installed around the center running light
on
> my L. I understand that these trim rings are prone to fall off. Can anyone
> offer a recommendation as to the type of adhesive to use to ensure the
ring
> is on the car for a long time?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve Galezowski
> 65 300L
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 18:03:13 -0500
> From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Chrysler 300 Spring Meet
>
> ATTENTION: To all those planning to attend the meet and haven't yet
> registered or reserved a hotel room.
>
> We have received only 17 mail in registrations so far!
> The Battle Creek Inn, as of today, has received 31 reservations.
> Reservation deadline is May 21 at hotel. That leaves you 3 weeks!
>
> Come on folks, help us out here. We need to get these in as early as
> possable to ease the load on the office staff.
> The meet is in 41 days! We expect everyone there!!! It's goona be a
good'n.
>
> The upcoming NewsFlite will have another registration form included in it.
> That issue should be out to all members by end of this week or first of
next
> week.
>
> Ray Jones, Meet Coordinator
> Y'all come now, y'hear?
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 22
> Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 09:45:43 -0700
> From: "north lake real estate" <nlre01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: 300L grille medallion
>
> I need the plastic lens cover for this running light. Can anyone help me
out
> with this. Emblemagic did not seem to have these. I've got the metal piece
> but someone chose to break the lens cover. I do have all the pieces, maybe
> there is some way to "glue?" it back together?
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to
http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 21:22:34 -0700
From: Gary W Nelson <Gary@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
If Dwight or someone can send me O.D. and also a photo of seal end of
filler tube I may have in stock. If so N/C send address.
Gary, The parts Doc
At 05:25 PM 04/30/2003 -0400, John Hertog wrote:
>Hi to all,
>
>Trying to help Dwight locate the right grommet for his fuel tank filler
>tube, 1964 Chrysler 300K. Can someone please look up a '64 parts book and
>confirm that the right part number is 1730087 ? (section 14) That is what
>I come up with using a 63 parts book, can't imagine it would be different,
>but I would feel better if double-checked!
>
>You can either "reply to all" or reply to Dwight at DMcGuire@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>Thanks
>John
>
>
>
>To send a message to this group, send an email to:
>Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>For list server instructions, go to
>http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network
Archive Sitemap