Re: [FWDLK] L-FORWARDLOOK Digest - 1 Jan 2008 to 2 Jan 2008 (#2008-3) was 58 Plymouth Fury?

From: Michael Sutherland <msutherland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:06:59 -0700

Well said - I agree.

-----Original Message-----
From: David & Susan Wallace [mailto:dswallace@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 3:54 PM

A car in this shape no engine or the wrong engine makes no difference. Still junk.
David Wallace
58 Fury

*************************************************************

To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [FWDLK] L-FORWARDLOOK Digest - 1 Jan 2008 to 2 Jan 2008 (#2008-3) was 58 Plymouth Fury?
  - From: a57fury

References:
- Re: [FWDLK] L-FORWARDLOOK Digest - 1 Jan 2008 to 2 Jan 2008 (#2008-3) was 58 Plymouth Fury?
  - From: David & Susan Wallace

Prev by Date: Re: [FWDLK] L-FORWARDLOOK Digest - 1 Jan 2008 to 2 Jan 2008 (#2008-3) was 58 Plymouth Fury?
Next by Date: Re: [FWDLK] L-FORWARDLOOK Digest - 1 Jan 2008 to 2 Jan 2008 (#2008-3) was 58 Plymouth Fury?
Previous by thread: Re: [FWDLK] L-FORWARDLOOK Digest - 1 Jan 2008 to 2 Jan 2008 (#2008-3) was 58 Plymouth Fury?
Next by thread: Re: [FWDLK] L-FORWARDLOOK Digest - 1 Jan 2008 to 2 Jan 2008 (#2008-3) was 58 Plymouth Fury?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread

Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network

Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.