Hello Everyone......I believe an update on my progress is in order. Let me start off by giving my reason to continue this thread. Politics is the strongest tool used in our society to control things. When ordinances and codes become imposed broadly without any regard for, in this case, historical automobiles; something must be done to revise these ordinances to correct the problem. Many, many antique automobiles are lost every day due to this particular ordinance. I'm talking across the country here.....not just in my little township. If we simply do nothing....we are letting a faulty piece of legislation infect our hobby. Infections must be treated and irradicated. Since I only received 1 negative comment on carrying on the discussion and numerous positive ones, I will proceed with this Very Important experience I am going through. Many of you have, or may encounter this harrowing experience at some point in your future. If I can do my part at altering even one destructive bill, aimed either inadverntly or not at the old car hobby, I will feel that I have done my part. Well, I went down to the code enforcement office today. The secretary at the desk made an attempt to put me off by appearing not to know anything....Let's hope this was an act. She informed me that the inspector who wrote up the complaint was on vacation until August 3....exactly 10 days after the complaint was received and the limit to correct the violations. Once she realized my persistance with this matter, she managed to find 1 code inspector in the building to talk to me. After explaining that I am a car collector and feel that the hobby itself serves the community in many ways....what with tax dollars from the purchase of parts, fuel, inspections, license tags, insurance. Added to this is the support of local business during the filming of several movies and commercials which have put a few of my cars to use over the years. I showed this inspector pictures of my cars and was very polite. He seemed willing to cooperate and gave me an extension which can continue to be revised as I make progress complying. My file was pulled up on the computer together with images of my yard. I was told that I must not work on these vehicles out in the open (in my own yard), but must do so within an enclosed garage....(Yeah Right! try enforcing that one!) I just listened and said that I understood. I mentioned the 4 inoperable vehicles directly across the street from this office and was told that this person was in compliance. Apparently this person must know the right people. I know for a fact that none of these vehicles run. What I am going to tell all of you now is not a throwing in of the towel, but the first step in acquiring some leverage as I march toward my goal. I have decided to sell off 3 non Forwardlook vehicles and dismantle one Forwardlook parts car, and another parts car of a different make. The time factor is not on my side to hold on to these. Frankly, someone else will hopefullly give them the attention that they deserve. They will be put on ebay this Sunday. The 57 Plymouth Conv. will of course, be put back on the ground, with a recharged battery and a new cover. Ultimately, this car will be garaged.....but, first things first. The FL parts car is a 58 Plymouth Belvedere 2 door hdtp.....but only really a shell which I am in need of the floor structures and trunk pans. The driveline in this car is oddly a '58 325 Dodge. My mission, once I get these affairs in order will be to write to my parish councilman, possibly with some local antique auto club support; to try to compromise this ordinance. What would be wrong with requiring a privacy fence to eliminate potential eyesores. How about allowing cover its or similar structures to satisfy the enclosed garage mandate. The most important message to send to the council will be that this bill in its current form is destructive to the preservasion of antique/special interest autos. Persistance hopefully will pay off. More to come............George.....the American : ) |