David, that motor in there is a 301. David Charles Gedraitis wrote: > > Actually it's a Chrysler, and it has the Spider type intake. Am I mistaken > as to what engine this is? > > ~dave > > On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, David Homstad wrote: > > > Dave > > > > Are you sure you have a 55 301? I thought that engine (similar to a 318 > > Poly) was introduced in mid 1956. In 55, I think Plymouth used the Dodge V8, > > which is totally different. Probably a 241 or 260. > > > > Check out http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Track/4164/55.htm for a > > discussion of 55/56 Plymouth engines. > > > > The easiest way to tell the Dodge Poly from a Plymouth Poly is that the > > Dodge intake manifold sits up like a spider on individual legs and has a > > separate plate to seal of the lifter valley. The Plymouth (318 style) uses > > the manifold to seal the lifter valley. > > > > You should be able to get all of your gasket needs from Felpro, from > > complete engine sets to just manifold sets, for either engine type. There > > was also a gasket set for a 56 and newer Plymouth V8 (318 style) recently on > > eBay. > > > > If you have a Dodge engine, the intake manifold torque should be identical > > to the 56 at 30 ft-lbs. Data is in the Specifications at the back of the > > Manual. The Manual doesn't say so, but I would tighten up the bolts on any > > manifold by starting in the center, alternating from side to side, and work > > out to the ends. Start with 10 ft-lbs, and then repeat at 20, then 30. > > Retorque after driving a hundred miles or so. > > > > Dave Homstad > > 56 Dodge D500 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Forward Look Mopar Discussion List > > [mailto:L-FORWARDLOOK@lists.psu.edu]On Behalf Of David Charles Gedraitis > > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 1:40 PM > > To: L-FORWARDLOOK@LISTS.PSU.EDU > > Subject: Re: [FWDLK] intake torque specs > > > > also, does anyone know a dependable place to get gaskets for said intake? > > ('55 301 poly 2bbl) NAPA has struck out twice, but we suspect it's the > > counter guy, who needs to ask for the year " '55 " to be clarified as > > "1955" if i'm not mistaken, there aren't too many other options... > > > > ~dave > >
|