From: "Bill G." <nilla6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "Bill G." <nilla6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [FWDLK] 727 vs 700R4
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 17:23:04 -0500
Thanks, Dave. The 700R4 is known for it's low first gear. Properly
prepared, it can be fairly strong. It can be adapted to the 330
hemi ;)
-Bill
At 05:08 PM 2/25/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Well, I guess you could say the 727 *is* better - unless you want another
>gear that is. The latest versions of the 700 are pretty good (like after
88
>or so - not sure about the year, not a GM guy). The 727 has always been
a
>"good" trans. The 700 has that 4th gear though - very nice to have in
these
>days of high(er) priced fuel. If you are looking at the "brute strength"
>factor - the 727 is undoubtedly stronger (IMHO of course) - doubt if a
700
>would hold up for any length of time behind a 750 HP Hemi in a 3800lb
(race)
>car, but the 727 will.
>Regards,
>DaveG.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Bill G. <nilla6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 12:56 PM
>Subject: [FWDLK] 727 vs 700R4
>
>
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> How good is the 747 transmission? Better
>> than a well built GM 700R4?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Bill
>> -----------------
>> Test drive a DeSoto today!
>
>
-----------------
Test drive a DeSoto today!