How about a ranking system? CNET, EBAY and others post customer feedback
good and bad to the site for review.
If the "site" is doing an analysis there should be some objective analysis
based upon fixed criteria for each vendor (delivery time, return policy,
problem resolution etc) then the liability issue should not be a problem..
Ranking them by crooks, cheats and liars, even if they, is what will lead to
trouble.
We can consider a listing of preferred vendors based upon list feed back
(advertising$$).
If this is something that we wan to persue for the site I will volunteer to
do a deeper look into some type of listing by "unfavorable" of something
similar.
Scott
From: Philip Patterson <bintakin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Philip Patterson <bintakin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [FWDLK] Rosen,Mitchell & others
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 23:17:03 -0400
Phil Patterson writes: A good idea, Dieter, but I wonder about liability
problems. I can see a team of lawyers, backed by the aforementioned
companys, desecending on the Forward Look club like flies on feces. GM ,
after all, has used this technique many times themselves to deal with
competitors and anyone else who gets in their way. If free speech is
still valid and if the lawyers can be kept off our backs, I am all for
it. But it could be a risky path to walk.
Dieter Bauer wrote:
> Hey GuysHow about we create a list of all the crooks and a--holes in
> this business and set up a spot on the forwardlook web page, that way
> everyone will have access to it and hopefully avoid some of the bad
> experiences that many have had. Maybe we could include pictures of
> these guys so everyone will know who they are and try to avoid doing
> business with them. Any business that does not treat their customers
> right will eventually fail and maybe we can speed up the process a
> little.What do you think? Dieter
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
|
|