Re: [FWDLK] Engine vent tube

From: "smike" <smike@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 08:57:08 -0600

On Thu, 1 Oct 1998, Rimington, Ken wrote:

> It appears to be an
> aftermarket 1956 version of a PCV valve.
>
> My debate is - do I use the vacuum vent assembly or replace it with the
> original vent tube.  Let me know what you think.

If you run it back into the carb, put in a one-way valve to prevent
backfires from travelling into the crankcase.  You could probably use a
PCV from the auto parts store.  Crankcase fires are nasty.

David Bell
smike@xxxxxxxxx

References:
- [FWDLK] Engine vent tube
  - From: Rimington, Ken

Prev by Date: [FWDLK] Engine vent tube
Next by Date: [FWDLK] vacuum advance
Previous by thread: [FWDLK] Engine vent tube
Next by thread: Re: [FWDLK] Engine vent tube
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network

Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.