|
thanks nick, and well, john would miss out on a body structurally superior to factory design, well at least one of mine. the exner design needed a few modifications to eliminate the typical flex the hardtops all have. converted sedans are no different than rusted originals that needed a full qtr replaced, or major sections of the floor pans, or any rusted car that has been repaired for that matter.
this "4dr sedan" doesnt need a cage to keep the body from twisting when the front wheels are fighting to stay on the ground
one of the few i did since a few said it couldnt happen.... all while 5 or 6 rust-free genuine 2drht's await resto in the garage line-up!
-----Original Message-----
From: drt-rdr@xxxxxxxxxxx To: L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wed, Nov 18, 2009 10:17 am Subject: Re: [FWDLK] newbie looking at 57 ply Savoy 2 dr sedan I don't know about that, ever seen the one Jim Rawa did converting a 4 door to a 2 door. I'd have no issues owning that car. It's sweet looking and all done correctly.
From: Bjwt56@xxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:00:19 EST
Subject: Re: [FWDLK] newbie looking at 57 ply Savoy 2 dr sedan
I would never consider owning, even if free, any MoPar that someone has attempted to convert to anything. A two door hard top, ex two door sedan, would never grace my driveway. John *************************************************************
To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1 ************************************************************* To unsubscribe or set your subscription options,
please go to
|
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network
