|
You guys are being so literal here. Sure, a contract is a contract, but you know what ? All my business is contract business, and many times negotiation comes into play after the fact for details that change as the job goes on, or things not foreseen.
It was my dear old Mom that told me "You can always ask!".
Methinks Neil has a way of wording his posts that really pushes the buttons of certain personalities. A deep breath and a few steps back might offer a perspective not so affrontive. Last time I checked, el Vedder worked in the insurance field. Is this a mystery as to why his paradigm in negotiation ?
All said, anything is possible and some things are probable, given some negotiation. Is there really anything more to this topic ? Let the interested parties practice their communication skills and see how things work out.
I have no clue what this thread is specifically about and only opened the below messages after it seemed this topic was going on and on. I *think* Thy Ramirez won an eBay auction for a car in Canada and wanted advice on how to get it across the border ???? Why are we slinging arrows over this ?
B.
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Jan & Roger van Hoy <vanhilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Foolish me, I was taught that once one enters into a contract it is legally
> enforceable and that the time for negotiation is before entering into the
> contract. Gee, I could have saved a lot of money on all that edyoukayshun.
> It just comes down to might-makes-right. I can not doubt that some people
> can not doubt this. It's so simple!
>
> For those of us who were passing notes in [bullying] class, what kind of car
> are we talking about here? I'd like to join in the buyer's joy at his or
> her new acquisition.
>
> --Roger van Hoy, Washougal, WA, '55 DeSoto, '58 DeSoto, '56 Plymouth, '66
> Plymouth, '41 Dodge
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original !
Message
-----
> From: "eastern sierra Adj Services"
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 11:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [FWDLK] Bringing a car into the United States
>
>
> > Sorry, I forget your first name, Mr. Benson, but I hardly think that I
> > am being dishonest, and I also question the harshness (altho the seller
> > might argue that point!) adjective, too.
> >
> > I didn't read the seller's terms on that auction, but I can not doubt
> > that a CAN seller (or, a US seller, advertising in CAN) would want the
> > buyer to come across the border and to go thru all the hassles and
> > expense of taking the car across the frontier.
> >
> > Everything is negotiable, and in that regard: he-who-wants-it-more:
> > LOSES.
> >
> > If the buyer wants the car worse than the sell!
er want
s to sell it, the
> > buyer takes the extra time and trouble and expense and hassles in
> > getting it across the border.
> >
> > If the seller wants the money, more than the car-possession, he will
> > agree to take the car across the border and conclude the transaction in
> > the buyer's country.
> >
> > Simple as that.
> >
> > Neil Vedder
>
> *************************************************************
>
> To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go to
> http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe or set your subscription options,
please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1
|
|
