|
Who says? Facts and figures please. Are you saying
that brand name loyalty isn't a factor in selling cars?
If "the past" doesn't sell cars, why the new "Hemi," "Ram,"
"Charger," "Challenger," "300," etc.?
--Roger van Hoy, Washougal, WA, '55 DeSoto, '58 DeSoto, '56
Plymouth, '66 Plymouth, '41 Dodge
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 5:57
AM
Subject: Re: [FWDLK] Price Insanity
Another take on the situation-- I've got some Brand F products, and
the F
Corp encourages restoration of their cars by licensing repro
parts. Shoot,
I could put my F brand together easily and
reasonably with all new parts.
The Got Mine Corp. is equally
favorable. WHY IS D-C SO RETICENT TO ALLOW
NORS PARTS FOR OUR
CARS? They're finally granting some licenses for
'60's-'70's
muscle cars. Are they ashamed of our Forward Look
stuff?
Why? DC does NOT want to live in the past! The Past
does NOT sell NEW vehicles. Period!
DC is in BUSINESS to sell NEW vehicles.
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe or set your subscription options,
please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1
|
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network