We,,. Joe, which car models particularly stick-
out, in your memory.
I would think that the 57's (for better or worse ; meaning desgn
versus construction!) and the 61's( design) might come to mind.
Although, your focus was always looking ahead, did you experience much
feedback, or Corp-impact, regarding the Public Acceptance
of a particular design?
Disabuse us.
Neil Vedder
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1
--- Begin Message ---
- From: JLSAVARD@xxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:15:54 EST
In a message dated 12/10/2006 1:32:44 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
esierraadj@xxxxxxxxx writes:
The 57's
were brought-out with only two years lead-time, so, if you worked in an
"advance-knowledge" position, in 1955, wouldn't you have wanted to
wait for the 57's to come out? (Or, in 1957, waiting for the 60 models, or,
even waiting for the 61's, knowing how 'antiquated' the "finned" cars would
be, after 1960??) .
I realize that people 'turned' their cars about
every 3 years, but wouldn't it be hard, to be a 'regular guy', at the
factory, & to KNOW what was coming-out, "soon"....?
Neil Vedder
OK, Neil,
I was there at Chrysler in the FWDLK years. In a funny way, my
mindset turned around to the point that the new cars always seemed to be two
years old, because the ones we worked on day-by-day felt current to us.
Whenever someone would contact me for a tune-up, I'd have to shift gears
mentally, and of course always wanted to make their car more "modern", because I
knew what was coming down the pipe.
Joe
Savard Lake Orion, Michigan
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe or set your subscription options,
please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1
|
--- End Message ---
|
|