Well I hope for the last time, I have FOUND the quintissential (whatever that means) reason for radial tire harshness at in-town speeds, when putting same on older cars. The entire article is over 5 pages but an exerpt: Car Life June 1967 article RADIALS Why have the worlds carmakers been so slow to even experiment seriously with radial tires? The answer can be summed up in a few words--- slow speed ride harshness. Radial tires deliver a rough ride, especially at low speeds. When a set of radials is put on a standard car (not originally designed for radial tires), a harsh, thumpy ride that can be heard as well as felt, is the result. Its as if the stiff belt between the tread and carcass can be felt. Small bumps, such as tar strips and railroad tracks, are especially noticeable. and the ride over such minor irregularities seems much worse at low speeds up to 35 or 40 mph. At highway speeds the tires smooth out and provide, if anything, a better than bias ply ride. Bajer says its not primarily the stiff that causes ride harshness. "What happens is that the radial cords are acting something like a separate set of spokes of the wheel," he explains. "when the belt runs over a bump it tries to shift backward a little, or actually rotate around the tire bead. The radial ply 'spokes' resist this backward shift and give an actual circumferential springing effect. But every spring has its natural vibration frequency. In this case (of radials) its between 40-50 cps. When the frequency 0f road bumps synchronizes with this natural frequency of the carcass, the ride harshness and thumpy sound is encountered. This happens at speeds up to 40 mph." "But at higher speeds, the radial tire tends to give a smoother ride than the bias ply type. This is because centrifigal force pulls outward on the belt and tends to stiffen it up substanatially. It literally glides right up over the bumps. Its as if you're riding on hoops that are connected to the wheel by springs (the belts)- but without the synchronous problem because youre above the natural frequency of the (pseudo) springs. This is better than bias plys becasue you're always working against rubbing friction between the plies, and a continual tread and carcass distortion at the contact patch". END of quote from article I must add that the last sentence has to do with the inherent tread distortion of bias plys at higher speed, there is an extreme distortion of the contact patch AND the tire itself, causing vibration and 'squirrelyness' of the entire tire. Some of you readers may recall seeing test photos of a bias ply tire running at 80 mph and the tread looks abysmally distorted. The radials will not get this distortion, thanks to the stabilizing design of the plies. Many of us have radials on our old wheels but the above is the most detailed and factual coverage of WHY there is an decrease of low speed ride comfort if we retrofit our cars. Interestingly there is no commentary on rim widths. And the impact problem is such that it will transmit into the old rims, that will often allow a full wheel cover to be thrown off in spite of its apparently adequate fit. My 51 Merc lost 2 fine Lincoln turbine covers, thanx to this secondary problem. And I know of others that have similarly lost rims. No its not to back fit, its to to wheel (rim) flex which is caused by the road irregularities transmitted into the older style rim, then the slight distortion plus centrifigal force causing the wheel cover to loosen and eventually get thrown off. Modern design has long solved the low speed ride harshness problem due to suspension tuning, again some of us recall optional RTS (Radial Tuned Suspensions) on some cars, mostly GM in the late 70's. At that time both bias belted and radial tires were available, and this option tuned out that harshness. Since radials are universal now, all suspensions are designed for them. In fact so well designed we can have 50 and 55 profile tires on cars and still have an extremely plush ride with the bonus of quick steering response and mega traction. All FYI Lars Lars
|