Roger vH, You are absolutely right, IF, the seller did not misrepresent the item. The point of this or any transaction, isn't just who pays the shipping and handling, it's misrepresenting or not completely describing an item before shipping to a trusting buyer. "If," a vendor sells a defective or incomplete part, or whatever the item, and "knows it is such before shipping, without telling the buyer," he should not only buy it back and pay all expenses, he should be keel hauled! (or at the least, firmly bent over a "tailfin," please note how I kept this fwdlk related)) Should the name of this vendor be known to the list? I will leave that one up to Roger, as he is one of only two, who knows all the details of this...let's say less than enchanting transaction. I still believe "What goes around, comes around." My $.26 worth, John in WI van Hoy wrote: > > <<Yes, please post the vendor. Once you have been caught up in this rip off > you look at this practice in a different light. >> > > Look guys, the story was that this vendor promptly gave a FULL REFUND of the > purchase price! > > To those of you who think that a full refund isn't enough, see if I've got > this right-- You want vendors to tie up their money and time and property > to save parts for decades, and then you want to be able to see the part at > your own home with NO risk or expense to you. > > There's a vast difference between an honest businessman who gives a full > refund and a ripoff. I didn't hear any of the criteria of a ripoff in the > story presented to this list. Those of you who expect a vendor to go in the > hole by paying the postage as well as the refund, ask yourself how many > people are going to run a business that way. > > --Roger van Hoy, '55DeSoto, '42DeSoto, '66Plymouth, '73Duster, Washougal, WA
|