Re: [FWDLK] What Is It?

[Mike Sealey <mopar2ya@YAHOO.COM>]

--- MARK J HASH <mjh@WANWEB.NET> wrote:

> Since I'm from the school of the 'mechanically
> declined,' I'll ask the question:  what benefits
> would one derive from having the bearing journals
> finished .001 inch undersize or having the tappet
> bodies be .008 inch oversize?

No "benefits" per se; this simply allowed the factory
to use parts that varied from the blueprint standard,
altho in their opinion not by enough to render said
part unusable.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com