Re: [FWDLK] Different wiews about NOS
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FWDLK] Different wiews about NOS



I think Hemmings has definitions at the front of their magazine.

Dave Homstad

-----Original Message-----
From:   Stig Molteberg [SMTP:mopar@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent:   Thursday, July 29, 1999 4:08 PM
To:     L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:        [FWDLK] Different wiews about NOS

I have a ongoing dispute with a seller on ebay about different phrases. It
could be fun to hear what you good members here would say about: NOS, NORS
and other phrases we use in our hobbie (disease :-))
I myself say that NOS is the same as New Obsolete Stock, some say New Old
Stock. What would you call a old aftermarket part? NORS?? Should a NOS part
include the original box? It should be fun do hear what opinion we all have
on this subject. What is correct, and what are the most often
missunderstandings?

--
Stig Molteberg
1956 Chrysler New Yorker St.Regis
1956 Chrysler New Yorker St.Regis
1956 Chrysler Windsor Limo
Nordic 55-56 MoPar Register www.forwardlook.net/nordicmopar



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.