Mike Sealey wrote: > Shouldn't this include Imperials? These were sold as a separate make during > this era, and at least in California were titled that way as well... Yes, but few people realize that, and C2000 has Imperial listed as a model under Chrysler. Which brings me to another point, now that we're getting these, how 'bout a yea or nea vote on whether we keep them? I thought it was a nice idea but I have also received a complaint or two about them. Drop me a line personally if you have strong feelings either way. -Dave
|