Mr. Sutton asked a question that is of some merit. Though it begins as a generally directed question, it seems, in the second half of the post, to be specifically directed towards me. I was not going to continue the thread as others had, I thought, answered the question and it, to me. had stretched beyond anything related with Imperials. Mr. Sutton is a person of who has been on this list far longer than I, so I shall follow his lead, as ever. I would not care for him to be treated in any way that could be construed as a rude. Heaven forbid. Here is a link to a site that explains the word coupe, which, of course, is of French origin. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=coupe It will be obvious to all that a hard top cannot, by strict definition, be considered to be a coupe. Why else would the automobile industry have felt it necessary to have two different descriptions for two different kinds of cars? Words in common parlance do not, of course, adhere to such rigorous consistency, as their meanings become fuzzy and change over time. My museum has just a horse carriage. I myself have ridden in a railway carriage coupe on British Railways, but this is probably more expounding than even the ever exhaustive Mr. Sutton might possibly want. For the record, the answer Mr. Sutton cared enough to comment on did not came from the seat of my pants. Like his question, it was a product of an experienced brain, trying to explain something to someone who expressed some perplexity, despite prior explanations, about the differences between the two terms. I cannot cite any references for the answer beyond my own Imperial related reading in books, magazines, previous answers given on this list, our web site and experience. If anyone wishes to dispute my answer in totality or in part, I, too, will experience some benefit, as my ignorance, along with the person who originally asked the question, will be dispelled. Until Mr. Sutton brought up the question of giving attributions for all such answers, I had thought the purpose of the list was for us to participate non-academically, as equals, and mutually benefit from this kind of interchange. I look forward to seeing full annotations on all future postings from Mr. Sutton in the future so I might learn, not, obviously, as I did about the difference between a sedan and a hard top, from the example of persons of unimpeachable erudition and knowledge. Mr. Sutton's pursuit of total accuracy in the future will be an example which I will be delighted to emulate. No doubt I will fail, but how often does one ever really surpass one's teacher? I'm sure everyone will want to do so as well and will wish to thank him for this idea as it will raise the level of intercourse here immeasurably. Mr. Sutton understands that is sometimes necessary to split hairs in public as long as it is, of course, in the best interests of mailing list members, a common goal about which he and I have shared some interesting private e-mails. Hugh